Effect of Fermented Cow and Soymilk as Probiotic on Energy Metabolism and Nutrient Retention in Broiler Chicken


Authors

  • Denny Rusmana Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
  • Lovita Adriani Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.277.281

Keywords:

Broiler chicken, cow milk, nutrient retention, probiotic, soymilk

Abstract

Background and Objective: Probiotics have been reported to have a positive effect on gut morphology and absorption of nutrients in poultry birds. Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of fermented cow and soymilk on energy metabolism and nutrient retention of broiler chicken. Materials and Methods: A total of 100-day old chick were allocated to 4 treatment groups in a complete randomized design (CRD) and each treatment was replicated 4 times with 5 chicken in each replicate. The treatments consisted of basal feed T0 (control), T1 (basal feed+100% fermented cow milk), T2 (basal feed +75% fermented cow milk +25% fermented soy milk) and T3 (basal feed+50% fermented cow milk +50% fermented soy milk. Results: The results show that Apparent metabolizable energy (AME), Apparent metabolizable energy with nitrogen (AMEn), retention of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen are significantly (p<0.05) different in the groups if compared with control. The clearer effect is found in T2 (basal feed+75% fermented cow milk+25% fermented soy milk) and T3 (basal feed+50% fermented cow milk and 50% fermented soy milk). Conclusion: The administration of fermented cow milk and soy milk has a negative effect on retention of phosphorus and no effect on retention of calcium but it shows a positive effect on energy metabolism and retention of dry matter (DM) and nitrogen in broiler.

References

Omar, M.A.E., 2014. Economic evaluation of probiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus) using in different broiler breeds within Egypt. Benha Vet. Med. J., 26: 52-60.

Castanon, J.I.R., 2007. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult. Sci., 86: 2466-2471.

Fuller, R., 1992. History and Development of Probiotics. In: Probiotics: The Scientific Basis, Fuller, R. (Ed.). Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, pp: 1-8.

Adriani, L., D. Latipudin, R.L. Balia and T. Widjastuti, 2019. Improvement of small intestine morphometry in broiler chicken using fermented cow and soymilk as probiotic. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 18: 255-259.

Pelicano, E.R.L., P.A. Souza, H.B.A. Souza, D.F. Figueiredo, M.M. Boiago, S.R. Carvalho and V.F. Bordon, 2005. Intestinal mucosa development in broiler chickens fed natural growth promoters. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 7: 221-229.

Adriani, L., A. Andiany, D. Latipudin, T. Benito and C. Cahyani, 2018. Effect of fermented cow and soybean milk with probiotic in improving blood cholesterol and triglyceride levels on broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 12: 600-604.

Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.

Palliyaguru, M.W., N. Priyankarage, S.S. Silva, S.P. Gunaratne, W.M. Weerasinghe, P.S. Fernadoand and M.H. Attapatu, 2004. Effect of different probiotics on nutrient utilisation and intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 45: 558-559.

Fioramonti, J., V. Theodorou and L. Bueno, 2003. Probiotics: What are they? What are their effects on gut physiology? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol., 17: 711-724.

de Vrese, M. and J. Schrezenmeir, 2008. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics. In: Food Biotechnology, Stahl, U., U.E.B. Donalies and E. Nevoigt (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-540-70535-2, pp: 1-66.

Pokusaeva, K., G.F. Fitzgerald and D.v. Sinderen, 2011. Carbohydrate metabolism in bifidobacteria. Genes Nutr., 6: 285-306.

Fernández, J., S. Redondo-Blanco, E.M. Miguélez, C.J. Villar, A. Clemente and F. Lombó, 2015. Healthy effects of prebiotics and their metabolites against intestinal diseases and colorectal cancer. AIMS Microbiol., 1: 48-74.

Petuely, F., 1957. Bifidusflora bei flaschenkindern durch bifidogene substanzen (Bifidusfaktor). Zeitschrift für Kinderheilkunde, 79: 174-179.

Yoshioka, Y., 1971. Studies on Lactobacillus Bifidus. Reports of Research Laboratory of Snow Brand Milk Product Company Limited (Tokyo) 72 : 1-114 (in Japanese)

Hayakawa, K., J. Mizutani, K. Wada, T. Masai, I. Yoshihara and T. Mitsuoka, 1990. Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on human faecal flora. Microbial. Ecol. Health Dis., 3: 293-303.

Thibault, R., F. Blachier, B. Darcy-Vrillon, P.d. Coppet, A. Bourreille and J.P. Segain, 2010. Butyrate utilization by the colonic mucosa in inflammatory bowel diseases: A transport deficiency. Inflammatory Bowel Dis., 16: 684-695.

Aliakbarpour, H.R., M. Chamani, G. Rahimi, A.A. Sadeghi and D. Qujeq, 2012. The Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteria probiotics influences intestinal mucin gene expression, histomorphology and growth performance in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 1285-1293.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Rusmana, D., & Adriani , L. (2020). Effect of Fermented Cow and Soymilk as Probiotic on Energy Metabolism and Nutrient Retention in Broiler Chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 19(6), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.277.281

Most read articles by the same author(s)