Distribution of Bacteria at Different Poultry Litter Depths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.10.13Keywords:
Bacteria, disease, litter depth, poultryAbstract
A common practice in the commercial broiler industry is to reuse litter over multiple broiler flocks. Over time the bacterial populations in the reused litter increases but how those organisms are spatially distributed throughout the litter bed is unclear. Therefore, the goal of this project was to investigate the distribution of bacteria at three different depths of litter. Litter samples were collected from three commercial broiler houses on three different farms. Four samples from each house were collected using clear PVC pipes which were driven through the litter bed to the clay floor. Each pipe was transported up-right to the lab, where they were cut into three sections (top, middle and bottom) exposing the litter for processing. Litter from each section was serially diluted in peptone and streaked onto either tryptic soy agar or Levin eosin methylene blue agar plates. Plates were incubated under the appropriate atmospheric condition for 24 h at 37oC. After 24 h, plates were counted for total aerobes, anaerobes and coliforms. Results of this study indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) in bacterial counts between the different sections of the litter. The middle and bottom sections had significantly lower anaerobe and coliform counts compared to the bacterial counts in the top sections. In conclusion, the results suggest that the middle and bottom section of litter provide a less favorable environment for bacterial growth than the top section.
References
Fries, R., M. Akcan, N. Bandick and A. Kobe, 2005. Microflora of two different types of poultry litter. Br. Poult. Sci., 46: 668-672.
Giambrone, J.J., O. Fagbohun and K.S. Macklin, 2008. Management practicesto reduce infectious laryngotracheitis virus in poultry litter. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 64-68.
Halbrook, E.R., A.R. Winter and T.S. Sutton, 1951. The microflora of poultry house litter and droppings. Poult. Sci., 30: 381-388.
Jeffrey, J.S., J.H. Kirk, E.R. Atwill and J.S. Cullor, 1998. Prevalence of selected microbial pathogens in processed poultry waste used as dairy cattle feed. Poult. Sci., 77: 808-811.
Lavergne, T.K., M.F. Stephens, D. Schellinger and W.A. Carney Jr., 2006. In-House Pasteurization of Broiler Litter. Louisiana State University Agriculture Center Publication, New York.
Lovett, J., J.W. Messer and R.B. Read, 1971. The microflora of Southern Ohio poultry litter. Poult. Sci., 50: 746-751.
Lu, J., S. Sanchez, C. Hofacre, J.J. Maurer, B.G. Harmon and M.G. Lee, 2003. Evaluation of broiler litter with reference to the microbial composition as assessed by using 16S rRNA and functional gene markers. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 69: 901-908.
Macklin, K.S., J.B. Hess and S.F. Bilgili, 2008. In-house composting and its effects on foodborne pathogens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 121-127.
Macklin, K.S., J.B. Hess, S.F. Bilgili and R.A. Norton, 2006. Effects of in-house composting of litter on bacteria levels. J. Applied Poult. Res., 15: 531-537.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometral Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Vizzier-Thaxton, Y., C.L. Balzli and J.D. Tankson, 2003. Relationship of broiler flock numbers to litter microflora. J. A
pplied Poult. Res., 12: 81-84.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Asian Network for Scientific Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.