The Diurnal Changes of Hepatic Enzymes and Metabolites of Methionine Metabolism in Laying Hens


Authors

  • T. Cao Noveltech, LLC., 16600 43rd Ave N., Minneapolis, MN 55446, USA
  • J.T. Weil Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • P. Maharjan Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • J. Lu Syngenta, 410 S. Swing Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409, USA
  • C.N. Coon Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.210.218

Keywords:

Diurnal variation, enzyme, laying hens, metabolite, methionine metabolism

Abstract

Background and Objective: The requirement of sulfur amino acids for laying hens have been determined but the method in which methionine is regulated has not been studied. The aim of this research was to study the hepatic methionine-metabolizing enzymes and metabolites in laying hens. Materials and Methods: Five hundred forty Dekalb-XL laying hens were housed and fed a control diet until sampling. On day of sampling, six hens were sacrificed at each time period to allow for determination of hepatic enzymatic activities and metabolite concentrations during light and dark periods. Data was analyzed using the general linear models (GLM) procedure with statistical analysis software (SAS). Results: The enzymes and metabolites showed cyclical changes related to light and dark periods. During the light period of the day, layers showed elevated activities of methionine s-adenosyltransferase (EC 2.5.1.6; MAT), cystathionine ß-synthase (EC 4.2.1.22; CS) and cystathionase (EC 4.4.1.1; C-ase) and depressed activities of betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.5; BHMT) and N5methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.13; MFMT), as compared to the dark period of the day. The hens also had a decreased methionine to cysteine ratio (Met/Cys ratio), an increased methylation ratio (s-adenosylmethionine to s-adenosylhomocysteine ratio; SAM/SAH ratio) and an increased cystathionine (CYST) concentration in the liver during the light period. Conclusion: The changes of the enzymatic activities and metabolite concentrations suggest that the methionine metabolism of laying hens during the light period was in favor of methionine degradation through cysteine synthesis. Alternatively, the metabolism of hens during the dark period was in favor of methionine conservation by limiting the conversion of methionine to cysteine. Thus, feeding hens a higher cysteine diet several hours before lights are turned off may prove beneficial to counteract the limited cysteine synthesis from dietary methionine during the dark period of the day.

References

Bin, P., R. Huang and X. Zhou, 2017. Oxidation resistance of the sulfur amino acids: Methionine and cysteine. BioMed Res. Int., Vol. 2017.

Fisher, C. and T.R. Morris, 1970. The determination of the methionine requirement of laying pullets by a diet dilution technique. Br. Poult. Sci., 11: 67-82.

Jensen, L.S., L. Falen and G.W. Schumaier, 1974. Requirement of white leghorn laying and breeding hens for methionine as influenced by stage of production cycle and inorganic sulfate. Poult. Sci., 53: 535-544.

Schutte, J.B. and E.J.V. Weerden, 1978. Requirement of the hen for sulphur‐containing amino acids. Br. Poult. Sci., 19: 573-581.

Parsons, C.M. and S.F. Ridlen, 1982. Feed costs can be lowered with amino acid programs. Feedstuffs, 54: 16-18.

Parsons, C.M. and R.W. Leeper, 1984. Choline and methionine supplementation of layer diets varying in protein content. Poult. Sci., 63: 1604-1609.

Calderon, V.M. and L.S. Jensen, 1990. The requirement for sulfur amino acid by laying hens as influenced by the protein concentration. Poult. Sci., 69: 934-944.

Schutte, J.B., J. de Jong and H.L. Bertram, 1994. Requirement of the laying hen for sulfur amino acids. Poult. Sci., 73: 274-280.

Strathe, A.B., A. Lemme, J.K. Htoo and E. Kebreab, 2011. Estimating digestible methionine requirements for laying hens using multivariate nonlinear mixed effect models. Poult. Sci., 90: 1496-1507.

Finkelstein, J.D., 1998. The metabolism of homocysteine: Pathways and regulation. Eur. J. Pediatr., 2: S40-S44.

Cao, Z. and C.N. Coon, 1994. Tissue distribution of five key enzymes and six metabolites involved in methionine metabolism in broilers. Poult. Sci., 73 (Suppl. 1): 96-96.

Mato, J.M. M.L. Martínez-Chantar and S.C. Lu, 2013. S-adenosylmethionine metabolism and liver disease. Ann. Hepatol., 12: 183-189.

Womack, M. and W.C. Rose, 1941. Partial replacement of dietary methionine by cystine for purposes of growth. J. Biol. Chem., 141: 375-379.

Sowers, J.E., W.L. Stockland and R.J. Meade, 1972. L-methionine and L-cystine requirements of the growing rat. J. Anim. Sci., 35: 782-788.

Finkelstein, J.D. and S.H. Mudd, 1967. Trans-sulfuration in mammals: The methionine sparing effect of cystine. J. Biol. Chem., 242: 873-880.

He, J.Y., B. Han, L.X. Tian, H.J. Yang, S.L. Zeng and Y.J. Liu 2016. The sparing effect of cystine on methionine at a constant TSAA level in practical diets of juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Aquacult. Res., 47: 2031-2039.

Baker, D.H., W.W. Clausing, B.G. Harmon, A.H. Jensen and D.E. Becker, 1969. Replacement value of cystine for methionine for the young pig. J. Anim. Sci., 29: 581-584.

Roth, F.X. and M. Kirchgessner, 1987. Biological efficiency of dietary methionine or cystine supplementation with growing pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 58: 267-280.

Roth, F.X. and M. Kirchgessner, 1989. Influence of the methionine: Cysteine relationship in the feed on the performance of growing pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 61: 265-274.

Chung, T.K. and D.H. Baker, 1992. Maximal portion of the young pig's sulfur amino acid requirement that can be furnished by cystine. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 1182-1187.

Buono, M.D., L.J. Wykes, D.E.C. Cole, R.O. Ball and P.B. Pencharz, 2003. Regulation of sulfur amino acid metabolism in men in response to changes in sulfur amino acid intakes. J. Nutr., 133: 733-739.

Graber, G. and D.H. Baker, 1971. Sulfur amino acid nutrition of the growing chick: Quantitative aspects concerning the efficacy of dietary methionine, cysteine and cystine. J. Anim. Sci., 33: 1005-1011.

Graber, G., H.M. Scott and D.H. Baker, 1971. Sulfur amino acid nutrition of the growing chick: Effect of age on the capacity of cystine to spare dietary methionine. Poult. Sci., 50: 1450-1455.

Sasse, C.E. and D.H. Baker, 1974. Sulfur utilization by the chick with emphasis on the effect of inorganic sulfate on the cystine-methionine interrelationship. J. Nutr., 104: 244-251.

Soares, J.H.Jr., 1974. Experiments on the requirement of inorganic sulfate by the chick. Poult. Sci., 53: 246-251.

Schutte, J.B., E.J.V. Weerden and H.L. Bertram, 1984. Protein and sulphur amino acid nutrition of the hen during the early stage of laying. Arch. Geflugelk, 48: 165-170.

Stipanuk, M.H. and N.J. Benevenga, 1977. Effect of cystine on the metabolism of methionine in rats. J. Nutr., 107: 1455-1467.

Young, V.R., 1987. 1987 McCollum award lecture. Kinetics of human amino acid metabolism: nutritional implications and some lessons. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 46: 709-725.

Finkelstein, J.D., 1990. Methionine metabolism in mammals. J. Nutr. Biochem., 1: 228-237.

Finkelstein, J.D., 2000. Pathways and regulation of homocysteine metabolism in mammals. Semin. Thromb. Hemost., 26: 219-225.

Biyatmoko, D., 2014. Effects the combinations of light color and intensity of light to age at first laying and production egg of alabio laying ducks. Int. J. Biosci., 5: 80-85.

Er, D., Z. Wang, J. Cao and Y. Chen, 2007. Effect of monochromatic light on the egg quality of laying hens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 16: 605-612.

Hiramoto, K., T. Muramatsu and J. Okumura, 1990. Protein synthesis in tissues and in the whole body of laying hens during egg formation. Poult. Sci., 69: 264-269.

Pens, Jr. A.M. and L.S. Jensen, 1991. Influence of protein concentration, amino acid supplementation and daily time of access to high- or low-protein diets on egg weight and components in laying hens. Poult. Sci., 70: 2460-2466.

Wurtman, R.J., 1969. Time-dependent variations in amino acid metabolism: Mechanism of the tyrosine transaminase rhythm in rat liver. Adv. Enzyme Regul., 7: 57-67.

Sánchez, V.C., R. Hernández-Muñoz, L. Sánchez, S. Vidrio, L. Yáñez and J. Suárez, 1991. Twenty-four-hour changes of S-Adenosylmethionine, S-Adenosylhomocysteine adenosine and their metabolizing enzymes in rat liver; possible physiological significance in phospholipid methylation. Int. J. Biochem., 23: 1439-1443.

Schalinske, K.L. and R.D. Steele, 1992. Variations in S-adenosylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine and adenosine concentrations in rat liver. Biofactors, 3: 265-268.

Ekmay, R.D., M. De Beer, S.J. Mei, M. Manangi and C.N. Coon, 2013. Amino acid requirements of broiler breeders at peak production for egg mass, body weight and fertility. Poult. Sci., 92: 992-1006.

Finkelstein, J.D. and J.J. Martin, 1984. Methionine metabolism in mammals. Distribution of homocysteine between competing pathways. J. Biol. Chem., 259: 9508-9513.

Mudd, S.H., J.D. Finkelstein, F. Irreverre and L. Laster, 1965. Transsulfuration in mammals: Microassays and tissue distribution of three enzymes of the pathway. J. Biol. Chem., 240: 4382-4392.

Mudd, S.H., H.L. Levy and G. Morrow, 1970. Deranged B12 metabolism: Effects on sulfur amino acid metabolism. Biochem. Med., 4: 193-214.

Finkelstein, J.D., W.E. Kyle and B.J. Harris, 1971. Methionine metabolism in mammals. Regulation of homocysteine methyltransferases in rat tissue. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 146: 84-92.

Greenberg, D.M., 1962. Cystathionine and homoserine cleavage: Cystathionine + H2O → Cysteine + α-ketobutyric acid + NH3 Homoserine + H2O → α-KetobuCyric acid + NH3. Methods Enzymol., 5: 936-942.

Cooper, J.D.H. and D.C. Turnell, 1982. Fluorescence detection of cystine by o-phthalaldehyde derivatisation and its separation using high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B: Biomed. Sci. Applic., 227: 158-161.

SAS., 2012. SAS® User's guide, statistics. Version 14.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Garcia, R.A.G. and M.H. Stipanuk, 1992. The splanchnic organs, liver and kidney have unique roles in the metabolism of sulfur amino acids and their metabolites in rats. J. Nutr., 122: 1693-1701.

Hoffman, D.R., D.W. Marion, W.E. Cornatzer and J.A. Duerre, 1980. S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine metabolism in isolated rat liver. J. Biol. Chem., 255: 10822-10827.

Xia, L., S. Ma, Y. Zhang, T. Wang, M. Zhou, Z. Wang and J. Zhang, 2015. Daily variation in global and local DNA methylation in mouse livers. PloS One, Vol. 10, No. 2.

Caudill, M.A., J.C. Wang, S. Melnyk, I.P. Pogribny and S. Jernigan et al., 2001. Intracellular S-adenosylhomocysteine concentrations predict global DNA hypomethylation in tissues of methyl-deficient cystathionine β-synthase heterozygous mice. J. Nutr., 131: 2811-2818.

Sengupta, A., S.D. Rhoades, E.J. Kim, S. Nayak, G.R. Grant, P. Meerlo and A.M. Weljie, 2017. Sleep restriction induced energy, methylation and lipogenesis metabolic switches in rat liver. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 93: 129-135.

Tisdale, M.J., 1980. Changes in tRNA methyltransferase activity and cellular S-adenosylmethionine content following methionine deprivation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Nucl. Acids Protein Synth., 609: 296-305.

Lu, S.C., 2000. S-adenosylmethionine. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 32: 391-395.

Matsuo, Y. and D.M. Greenberg, 1958. A crystalline enzyme that cleaves homoserine and cystathionine. I. isolation procedure and some physicochemical properties. J. Biol. Chem., 230: 545-560.

Matsuo, Y. and D.M. Greenberg, 1959. A crystalline enzyme that cleaves homoserine and cystathionine. IV. Mechanism of action, reversibility and substrate specificity. J. Biol. Chem., 234: 516-519.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Cao, T., Weil, J., Maharjan, P., Lu, J., & Coon , C. (2020). The Diurnal Changes of Hepatic Enzymes and Metabolites of Methionine Metabolism in Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 19(5), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.210.218

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>