Effect of Chitosan as a Biological Sanitizer for Salmonella Typhimurium and Aerobic Gram Negative Spoilage Bacteria Present on Chicken Skin


Authors

  • Anita Menconi Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco Department de Medicina y Zootecnia de Aves, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico D.F., 04510
  • Juan David Latorre Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • Gopala Kallapura Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • Neil R. Pumford Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • Marion J. Morgan Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • B.M. Hargis Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • G. Tellez Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.318.321

Keywords:

Chicken skin, chitosan, Salmonella, sanitizer

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of chitosan as a biological sanitizer on chicken skin during storage. For experiment 1 (two trials) five skin samples of equal size were dipped into a solution containing 106 cfu/mL of Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) for 30s. Skin samples were then removed and dipped into a solution containing PBS or 0.5% chitosan for 30s. In experiment 2, aerobic Gram negative spoilage bacteria were used as indicators instead of ST. In both experiments, all samples were placed in individual bags and kept at 4°C. In experiment 1, dipping ST contaminated skin samples in a solution of 0.5% chitosan reduced (p<0.05) the recovery of ST by 24 h. In experiment 2, 0.5% chitosan treatment solution reduced (p<0.05) the presence of spoilage-causing psychrotrophic bacteria below detectable levels. These results suggest that 0.5% chitosan has a potential for use in an intervention technology for the control of foodborne pathogens on the surface of chicken skin contaminated with bacteria during storage.

References

Bailey, J.S., N.A. Cox, S.E. Craven and D.E. Cosby, 2002. Serotype tracking of Salmonella through integrated broiler chicken operations. J. Food Prot., 65: 742-745.

Byrd, J.A., D.E. Corrier, M.E. Hume, R.H. Bailey, L.H. Stanker and B.M. Hargis, 1998. Effect of feed withdrawal on Campylobacter in the crops of market-age broiler chickens. Avian Dis., 42: 802-806.

Cason, J.A., J.S. Bailey, N.J. Stern, A.D. Whittemore and N.A. Cox, 1997. Relationship between aerobic bacteria, Salmonellae and Campylobacter on broiler carcasses. Poult. Sci., 76: 1037-1041.

Chaine, A., E. Arnaud, A. Kondjoyan, A. Collignan and S. Sarter, 2013. Effect of steam and lactic acid treatments on the survival of Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni inoculated on chicken skin. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 162: 276-282.

Corrier, D.E., J.A. Byrd, B.M. Hargis, M.E. Hume, R.H. Bailey and L.H. Stanker, 1999. Survival of Salmonella in the crop contents of market-age broilers during feed withdrawal. Avian Dis., 43: 453-460.

Corrier, D.E., J.A. Byrd, B.M. Hargis, M.E. Hume, R.H. Bailey and L.H. Stanker, 1999. Presence of Salmonella in the crop and ceca of broiler chickens before and after preslaughter feed withdrawal. Poult. Sci., 78: 45-49.

Darmadji, P. and M. Izumimoto, 1994. Effect of chitosan in meat preservation. Meat Sci., 38: 243-254.

El Hadrami, A., L.R. Adam, I. El-Hadrami and F. Daayf, 2010. Chitosan in plant protection. Mar. Drugs, 8: 968-987.

Friedman, M. and V.K. Juneja, 2010. Review of antimicrobial and antioxidative activities of chitosans in food. J. Food Prot., 73: 1737-1761.

Hargis, B.M., D.J. Caldwell, R.L. Brewer, D.E. Corrier and J.R. DeLoach, 1995. Evaluation of the chicken crop as a source of Salmonella contamination for broiler carcasses. Poult. Sci., 74: 1548-1552.

Kong, M., X.G. Chen, K. Xing and H.J. Park, 2010. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: A state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 144: 51-63.

Lynch, M., J. Painter, R. Woodruff and C. Braden, 2006. Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks-United States, 1998-2002. Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep., 55: 1-34.

Mikolajczyk, A. and M. Radkowski, 2002. Salmonella spp. on chicken carcasses in processing plants in Poland. J. Food Prot., 65: 1475-1479.

No, H.K., N.Y. Park, S.H. Lee and S.P. Meyers, 2002. Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 74: 65-72.

No, H.K., S.P. Meyers, W. Prinyawiwatkul and Z. Xu, 2007. Applications of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of foods: A review. J. Food Sci., 72: R87-R100.

Northcutt, J.K., M.E. Berrang, J.A. Dickens, D.L. Fletcher and N.A. Cox, 2003. Effect of broiler age, feed withdrawal and transportation on levels of coliforms, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli and Salmonella on carcasses before and after immersion chilling. Poult. Sci., 82: 169-173.

Ouattar, B., R.E. Simard, G. Piett, A. Begin and R.A. Holley, 2000. Inhibition of surface spoilage bacteria in processed meats by application of antimicrobial films prepared with chitosan. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 62: 139-148.

Petrovich, I., L.A. Grigor'iants, A.N. Gurin and N.A. Gurin, 2008. Chitosan: structure, properties, use in medicine and stomatology. Stomatologiia, 87: 72-77.

Rabea, E.I., M.E.T. Badawy, C.V. Stevens, G. Smagghe and W. Steurbaut, 2003. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: Applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules, 4: 1457-1465.

Ramirez, G.A., L.L. Sarlin, D.J. Caldwell, C.R. Yezak Jr. and M.E. Hume et al., 1997. Effect of feed withdrawal on the incidence of Salmonella in the crops and ceca of market age broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 76: 654-656.

Rose, B.E., W.E. Hill, R. Umholtz, G.M. Ransom and W.O. James, 2002. Testing for Salmonella in raw meat and poultry products collected at federally inspected establishments in the United States, 1998 through 2000. J. Food Prot., 65: 937-947.

Sarlin, L.L., E.T. Barnhart, D.J. Caldwell, R.W. Moore and J.A. Byrd et al., 1998. Evaluation of alternative sampling methods for Salmonella critical control point determination at broiler processing. Poult. Sci., 77: 1253-1257.

SAS, 2002. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.

Senel, S. and S.J. McClure, 2004. Potential applications of chitosan in veterinary medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 56: 1467-1480.

Singla, A.K. and M. Chawla, 2001. Chitosan: Some pharmaceutical and biological aspects-an update. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 53: 1047-1067.

Suman, S.P., R.A. Mancini, P. Joseph, R. Ramanathan, M.K. Konda, G. Dady and S. Yin, 2010. Packaging-specific influence of chitosan on color stability and lipid oxidation in refrigerated ground beef. Meat Sci., 86: 994-998.

Tellez, G., C.E. Dean, D.E. Corrier, J.R. Deloach, L. Laeger and B.M. Harris, 1993. Effect of dietary lactose on cecal morphology, pH, organic acids and Salmonella enteritidis organ invasion in leghorn chicks. Poult. Sci., 72: 636-642.

Vargas, M. and C. Gonzalez-Martinez, 2010. Recent patents on food applications of chitosan. Recent Pat. Food, Nutr. Agric., 2: 121-128.

Zhang, L., P. Singh, H.C. Lee and I. Kang, 2013. Effect of hot water spray on broiler carcasses for reduction of loosely attached, intermediately attached and tightly attached pathogenic (Salmonella and Campylobacter) and mesophilic aerobic bacteria. Poult. Sci., 92: 804-810.

Zhao, T., P. Zhao and M.P. Doyle, 2009. Inactivation of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on lettuce and poultry skin by combinations of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Food Prot., 72: 928-936.

Zheng, L.Y. and J.F. Zhu, 2003. Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydr. Polym., 54: 527-530.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Menconi, A., Hernandez-Velasco, X., Latorre, J. D., Kallapura, G., Pumford, N. R., Morgan, M. J., Hargis, B., & Tellez , G. (2013). Effect of Chitosan as a Biological Sanitizer for Salmonella Typhimurium and Aerobic Gram Negative Spoilage Bacteria Present on Chicken Skin. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(6), 318–321. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.318.321

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>