Live Performance Characteristics, Pathogen Load and Foot Pad Lesions in Range-Reared Heritage vs. Conventional Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)


Authors

  • B.A. McCrea Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, DE, USA
  • M.A. Leslie Masterfeeds, London, Ontario, Canada
  • L.M. Stevenson Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849-5416, USA
  • K.S. Macklin Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849-5416, USA
  • L.J. Bauermeister Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849-5416, USA
  • J.B. Hess Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849-5416, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2012.438.444

Keywords:

Campylobacter, Clostridium perfringens, free range, heritage Turkey, pododermatitis, Salmonella, Turkeys

Abstract

A study was performed to compare the performance of heritage (Bourbon Red) and conventional (Broad Breasted White) turkey varieties in an outdoor range management system in the Southeastern United States. Turkeys were brooded indoors to 4 weeks of age and then moved to outdoor pens until processed at 17 weeks of age. Period and cumulative BW gain, feed intake and feed conversion were compared at 7, 10, 13 and 17 weeks of age. The final live weight, carcass weight and carcass yield were compared for both varieties and sexes of turkeys. Foot pad lesions were scored at 4, 7, 10, 13 and 17 weeks of age. The presence of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Clostridium perfringens, total aerobes and total enteric counts were determined via cloacal swabs or carcass rinsate. Significant differences between varieties with regard to live performance and carcass data were noted. The BBW turkeys had a higher feed intake, weight gain, live weights, carcass weights and carcass yields than the BR turkeys. Significant differences between the sexes for live weight and carcass weight but not carcass yield were also noted. Foot pad lesions were often identified in the BBW strain, with the majority of the BBW turkeys (75.2%) having detectable lesions by week 17. In comparison, the BR turkey had no lesions at week 17. The pathogen load of the two varieties was not different with the exception of Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic counts, both of which were higher in BBW. The data collected in this study will aid small producers with alternative production of heritage turkey varieties.

References

Arsenault, J., A. Letellier, S. Quessy, J.P. Morin and M. Boulianne, 2007. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. carcass contamination in turkeys slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. J. Food Prot., 70: 1350-1359.

Bender, M., 2006. The Importance of Genetics: Biological fitness and productivity in range-based systems comparing standard turkey varieties and industrial stocks. SARE Grant Final Report, SARE Project No. LS02-134. http://mysare.sare.org/mySARE/ProjectReport.aspx?do=viewRept&pn=LS02-134&y=2005&t=0.

Clark, S., G. Hansen, P. McLean, P. Bond Jr., W. Wakeman, R. Meadows and S. Buda, 2002. Pododermatitis in turkeys. Avian Dis., 46: 1038-1044.

Fanatico, A.C., P.B. Pillai, L.C. Cavitt, C.M. Owens and J.L. Emmert, 2005. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Growth performance and carcass yield. Poult. Sci., 84: 1321-1327.

Glass, K., 2003. Raising Heritage Turkeys. In: Raising Poultry on Pasture: Ten Years of Success, Padgham, J.L. (Ed.). American Pastured Poultry Producers, USA., pp: 107-108.

Hartman, S., S.A. Taleb, T. Geng, K. Gyenai, X. Guan and E. Smith, 2006. Comparison of plasma uric acid levels in five varieties of the domestic Turkey, Meleagris gallopavo. Poult. Sci., 85: 1791-1794.

Havenstein, G.B., P.R. Ferket, J.L. Grimes, M.A. Qureshi and K.E. Nestor, 2007. Comparison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type Turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 Turkey diets: Growth rate, livability and feed conversion. Poult. Sci., 86: 232-240.

Kamara, D., K.B. Gyenai, T. Geng, H. Hammade and E.J. Smith, 2007. Microsatellite marker-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult. Sci., 86: 46-49.

Lance, G.C., 1983. Economic evaluation of total confinement and open range turkey production systems in Georgia. Poult. Sci., 62: 1142-1154.

Padgham, J., 2002. Raising Historical Turkeys. In: Raising Poultry on Pasture: Ten Years of Success. Padgham, J. (Ed.). The American Pastured Poultry Producers Association Compilation, USA., pp: 105-106.

Ponte, P.I.P., C.M.C. Rosado, J.P. Crespo, D.G. Crespo and J.L. Mourao et al., 2008. Pasture intake improves the performance and meat sensory attributes of free-range broilers. Poult. Sci., 87: 71-79.

Rich, R., 1998. Research Adventure. In: Raising Poultry on Pasture: Ten Years of Success, Padgham, J. (Ed.). The American Pastured Poultry Producers Association Compilation, USA., pp: 103-104.

Shriver, J., 2003. Heritage turkeys bring that old taste home. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/2003-11-05-turkey_x.htm.

Smith, E.J., T. Geng, E. Long, F.W. Pierson, D.P. Sponenberg, C. Larson and R. Gogal, 2005. Molecular analysis of the relatedness of five domesticated turkey strains. Biochem. Genet., 43: 35-47.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

McCrea, B., Leslie, M., Stevenson, L., Macklin, K., Bauermeister, L., & Hess , J. (2012). Live Performance Characteristics, Pathogen Load and Foot Pad Lesions in Range-Reared Heritage vs. Conventional Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). International Journal of Poultry Science, 11(7), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2012.438.444

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>