Research Article Open Access

Effect of Photoperiod on the Production of Chukar Partridges (Alectoris chukar)

Authors

V.I.A. Alva
Departamentos de Medicina zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico, Km 38.5 carretera Mexico-Texcoco, C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
|
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
L.J.A. Quintana
Departamentos de Medicina zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico, Km 38.5 carretera Mexico-Texcoco, C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
|
I.C. Gonzales-Rebeles
Departamentos de Medicina zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico, Km 38.5 carretera Mexico-Texcoco, C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
|
A.M. Gonzalez
Departamento de Zootecnia, Posgrado en Produccion Animal, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Km 38.5 carretera Mexico-Texcoco, C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
Published on: November 15, 2015
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2015.657.663
PDF

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of variations in photoperiod duration on production indicators such as amount of eggs-laid and weight in chukar partridges (Alectoris chukar). Ninety individuals were divided into groups of 3 males and 7 females per cage (9 cages). Three different photoperiod treatments were used (18, 16 and 14 h light) with three repetitions per treatment. Males and females were randomly selected for each group. Means between treatments were compared using ANDEVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons in a GLM using the SAS V.8.0 software package. The following variables were evaluated during 18 production weeks: egg weight (EW), egg mass (EM), eggs per female (EF) and laying percentage (LP). Significant differences (p<0.05) were found in EW between 18 and 14 h light, representing a 7.1% in EW with decreasing photoperiod. No significant differences (p>0.05) were found in the remaining parameters between treatments. There was an improvement of all production variables at the smallest photoperiod (14 h) even though only EW was statistically significant.

Keywords:

Egg production, laying cycle, light-hours, partridges, photoperiod

Article Metrics

136 Abstract Views
132 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Effect of Photoperiod on the Production of Chukar Partridges (Alectoris chukar) on PlumX

How to Cite

Alva, V., Quintana , L., Gonzales-Rebeles, I., & Gonzalez, A. (2015). Effect of Photoperiod on the Production of Chukar Partridges (Alectoris chukar). International Journal of Poultry Science, 14(12), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.657.663
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Cetin, O., 2002. Egg production and some hatchability characteristics of rock partridges (Alectoris graeca) mated at different rates. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 26: 1009-1011.
2.
Bair, C.W. and W.W. Marion, 1978. Yolk cholesterol in eggs from various avian species. Poult. Sci., 57: 1260-1265.
3.
Del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, J. Sargatal and J. Cabot, 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World: New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Vol. 2, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
4.
Ehrlich, P.R., D.S. Dobkin and D. Wheye, 1988. The Birder's Handbook. Simon and Schuster Inc., Nueva York, EUA.
5.
Foster, W.H., 1968. The effect of light‐dark cycles of abnormal lengths upon egg production. Br. Poult. Sci., 9: 273-284.
6.
Moro, M.E.G., J. Ariki, P.A. de Souza, H.B.A. de Souza, V.M.B. de Moraes and F.C. Vargas, 2006. Carcass income and chemical composition of the native partridge (Rhynchotus rufescens-Tinamiformes) meat. Ciencia Rural, 36: 258-262.
7.
Kirby, J.D. and D.P. Froman, 2000. Reproduction in the Male Birds. In: Sturkie's Avian Physiology, Whittow, G.C. (Ed.). 5th Edn., Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 597.
8.
Krawczyk, J., 2009. Quality of eggs from polish native greenleg partridge chicken-hens maintained in organic vs. backyard production systems. Anim. Sci. Papers Rep., 27: 227-235.
9.
Lowe, R.W. and B.W. Heywang, 1964. Effect of various light treatments during growing period on egg production of october hatched white leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci., 43: 11-15.
10.
Lucas, L.M., L.E. Campbell and H.L. Marks, 1968. Lighting poultry houses. Farmers Bulletin No. 2229, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 12.
11.
Mehmet, H.A. and O. Ozbey, 2008. The effect of different housing on egg productivity and hatchability in rock partridges. Eylul, 22: 267-271.
12.
Morris, T.R., 1967. The effect of light intensity on growing and laying pullets. World's Poult. Sci. J., 23: 246-252.
13.
Morris, T.R., 1967. Lighting programs for growing and laying pullets. World Poult. Sci. J., 24: 326-335.
14.
Nath R.K. and W.N. Mark, 1976. Fractionated egg yolk product. Application No. 347, Cornell Research Foundation, Inc., Ithaca, New York, USA.
15.
Ostrander, C.E. and C.N. Turner, 1961. Effect of various intensities of light on egg production of single comb white leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci., 40: 1440-1445.
16.
Ryan, F.A., E.P. Singsen, J.R. Carson, L.M. Potter and W.A. Junnile, 1959. Fourteen hour day versus all-night lights in poultry laying houses. Poult. Sci., 38: 1243-1243.
17.
Robinson, F.E. and R.A. Renema, 2003. Managing what you can't see: The role of feed in breeder ovary management. PIC Health Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
18.
Rosales, A.A., H.V. Bielller and A.B. Stephenson, 1968. Effect of lighting cycles on oviposition and egg production. Poult. Sci., 47: 586-591.
19.
Siopes, T.D. and W.O. Wilson, 1981. Termination of photorefractoriness in the chukar partridge (Alectoris graeca chukar) by low light intensity. J. Reprod. Fertil., 63: 125-128.
20.
Woodard, A.E., R.L. Snyder and L. Fuqua, 1978. Testicular regression and recovery in the chukar partridge as affected by photoperiod. Poult. Sci., 57: 298-300.
21.
Woodard, A.E., J.C. Hermes and C.L. Fuqua, 1986. Effects of light conditioning on reproduction in partridge. Poult. Sci., 65: 2015-2022.
22.
Slaugh, B.T., N.P. Johnston, J.T. Flinders and J.A. Roberson, 1992. Synchronizing mating of male and female chukars. Anim. Technol. J., 43: 39-41.
23.
Yannakopoulus, A.L., 1992. Greek experiences with game birds. Anim. Breed. Abstract, 61: 3375-3375.

Most read articles by the same author(s)