Research Article Open Access

Effect of Photoperiod on Production of Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)

Authors

V.I.A. Alva
Departamentos de Medicina Zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico
|
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
L.J.A. Quintana
Departamentos de Medicina Zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico
|
I.C. Gonzales-Rebeles
Departamentos de Medicina Zootecnia de Aves, Etologia, Fauna Silvestre Animales de Laboratorio, FMVZ, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegacion Coyoacan, D.F.C.P. 04510, Mexico
|
A.M. Gonzalez
Departamento de Zootecnia, Posgrado en Produccion Animal, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Km 38.5 carretera Mexico-Texcoco. C.P. 56230, Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
Published on: November 15, 2015
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2015.651.656
PDF

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of photoperiod duration on production parameters (amount of eggs and weight) in ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus Colchicus). Forty-five birds were caged, distributed in groups of one male and four females (total 9 cages). Three photoperiod treatments were applied (18, 16 and 14 h of light) with three repetitions per treatment. Males and females were randomly assigned to the different groups. An ANDEVA test was used to compare means between treatments, with a multiple comparison Tukey's test in a GLM with SAS V.8.0. software package. Production parameters were recorded during 18 production weeks: egg weight (EW), egg mass (EM), eggs per female (EF) and laying percentage (LP). Significant differences were found in all variables between weeks (p<0.01), although the interaction of photoperiod with week was not significant (p>0.05). Photoperiod treatment had a significant effect on LP, EF and EM (p<0.05) during the study period (18 weeks); EW showed a 0.65% difference between the 18 h-light and 14 h-light treatments, although not statistically significant (p>0.05). All productive variables improved with the highest light-hours treatment (18 h) with the exception of EW.

Keywords:

Egg production, laying cycle, light hours, pheasants, photoperiod

Article Metrics

113 Abstract Views
94 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Effect of Photoperiod on Production of Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) on PlumX

How to Cite

Alva, V., Quintana , L., Gonzales-Rebeles, I., & Gonzalez, A. (2015). Effect of Photoperiod on Production of Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). International Journal of Poultry Science, 14(12), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.651.656
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Blake, A.G., R. Balander, C.J. Flegal and R.K. Ringer, 1987. Ahemeral light-dark cycles and egg production parameters of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Poult. Sci., 66: 258-263.
2.
Cain, J.R., 1979. Key points of commercial pheasant management. Game Bird Bull., 12: 1-13.
3.
Bair, C.W. and W.W. Marion, 1978. Yolk cholesterol in eggs from various avian species. Poult. Sci., 57: 1260-1265.
4.
Del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, J. Sargatal and J. Cabot, 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World: New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Vol. 2, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
5.
Ehrlich, P.R., D.S. Dobkin and D. Wheye, 1988. The Birder's Handbook. Simon and Schuster Inc., Nueva York, EUA.
6.
Hulet, M.R., L.F. Kime and J.K. Harper, 2004. Agricultural alternatives: Pheasant production. College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension and Resident Education, The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
7.
Kirby, J.D. and D.P. Froman, 2000. Reproduction in the Male Bird. In: Sturkie's Avian Physiology, Whittow, G.C. (Ed.). 5th Edn., Academic Press, USA., pp: 597-615.
8.
Mashaly, M.M. and O.D. Keene, 1979. Effect of different lighting regimens on the reproductive performance of pheasants. Poult. Sci., 58: 1082-1083.
9.
Mashaly, M.M., K.R. Kratzer and O.D. Keene, 1983. Effect of photoperiod on body weight and reproductive performance of ringneck pheasants. Poult. Sci., 62: 2109-2113.
10.
Morris, T.R., 1994. Lighting for layers: What we know and what we need to know. World's Poult. Sci. J., 50: 283-287.
11.
Randy, S., 1997. Ringneck pheasant. Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University, USA.
12.
Shanawany, M.M., 1982. The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying hens-A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 38: 120-126.
13.
Simopoulos, A.P., 2000. Symposium: Role of poultry products in enriching the human diet with n-3 PUFA, human requirement for n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Poult. Sci., 79: 961-970.
14.
Slaugh, B.T., N.P. Johnston, J.D. Patten and G.W. White, 1988. Effects of photoperiod and intermittent lighting on reproduction in pheasant hens. Theriogenology, 30: 291-301.
15.
Tepeli, C., O. Cetin, K. Kirikci and A. Gunlu, 2002. The effects of different light periods on some production characteristics of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 72: 960-962.
16.
Tesky, J.L., 1995. Phasianus colchicus. The Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
17.
Woodard, A.E. and R.L. Snyder, 1978. Cycling for egg production in the pheasant. Poult. Sci., 57: 349-352.
18.
Yang, Y.H. and K.I. Kim, 1993. Artificial light control and improved feed formulation for pheasant production. I. Effect of artificial light control on sexual maturity and egg production. Korean J. Anim. Sci., 35: 271-277.
19.
Yang, Y.H. and K.I. Kim, 1993. Artificial light and improved feed formulation for pheasant production. II. Effect of artificial light control and fertility and hatchability. Korean J. Anim. Sci., 35: 279-284.
20.
Marshall, T.C., J. Slate, L.E.B. Kruuk and J.M. Pemberton, 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol., 7: 639-655.
21.
Robinson, F.E. and R.A. Renema, 2003. Managing what you can't see: The role of feed in breeder ovary management. PIC Health Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
22.
Ensminger, M.E., 1980. Poultry Science (Animal Agricultura Series). 2nd Edn., The Interstate Printer and Publishers, Danvillei Illinois, Pages: 502.
23.
Gorrachategui, G.M., 1996. Alimentacion de aves alternativas: Codornices, faisanes y perdices. Proceedings of the 12th Curso de Especializacion Fedna, November 7-8, 1996, Madrid, pp: 1-63.
24.
Jacovak, M. and Z. Mrsic, 1992. The reproductive potential of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) under natural and artificial conditions. Anim. Breeding Abstract, 60: 6599-6599.
25.
Kirby, J.D. and D.P. Froman, 2000. Reproduction in the Male Birds. In: Sturkie's Avian Physiology, Whittow, G.C. (Ed.). 5th Edn., Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 597.
26.
Mantovani, C., S. Cerolini, M.G. Mangiagilli, F. Bellagamba and R. Rizzi, 1993. Egg laying of caged pheasants in a controlled environment. Rivista di Avicoltura, 62: 39-42.
27.
Romboli, I., S. Zanobini and M.M.F. di Cossato, 1996. Effect of photoperiod on reproductive performances of pheasants. Annali della Facoltadi Medicina Veterinaria di Prisa (Italy), 49: 183-188.
28.
Yannakopoulus, A.L., 1992. Greek experiences with game birds. Anim. Breed. Abstract, 61: 3375-3375.

Most read articles by the same author(s)