Egg Quality and Nutritional Profiles of Four Turkey Varieties Reared under Tropical Conditions
Authors
-
Md Sazedul K. Sarker
Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Poultry Research Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh
-
Nushrat N. Lisa
-
Biswajit Kumar Biswas
-
Farhana Sharmin
-
Umme S. Ety
-
Sadman S. Zihan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66920/ijps.2026.133.140Keywords:
Amino acid profile, egg quality, tropical conditions, Turkey varietyAbstract
Background and Objective: Characterizing the egg quality traits and nutritional composition of turkey varieties is essential for informed breeding decisions and the development of functional eggs. However, information on these characteristics under tropical production conditions remains limited. Therefore, this study investigated the egg quality traits, proximate composition and amino acid profiles of eggs from four turkey varieties (Black, Bronze, White and Bourbon Red) reared under tropical conditions in Bangladesh.
Materials and Methods: A total of 240 turkey layers, with 60 birds per variety, were reared on a corn-soya-based diet from 24 to 55 weeks of age in four separate floor pens under an intensive rearing system. At 55 weeks of age, a total of 120 eggs (30 eggs per variety) were randomly collected to evaluate external and internal egg quality, proximate composition and amino acid profiles. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and treatment means were separated using Duncan's multiple range test at p<0.05.
Results: The White variety exhibited a higher shape index than the other varieties (p<0.001). Moisture, crude protein and ash contents differed among the varieties. Bourbon Red showed the highest moisture content (p<0.001), whereas Black and Bronze exhibited the highest crude protein content and Black had the highest ash content (p<0.05). The Black variety also showed the highest amino acid concentration, followed by the Bronze variety (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Overall, the Black and Bronze turkey varieties produced eggs with superior crude protein and amino acid concentrations, providing valuable baseline nutritional information to support variety selection under tropical production conditions.
References
Caffa, I., E. Proietti, F. Turrini, C. Borgarelli, M.R. Ferrando and L. Pisciotta et al., 2025. Nutritional aspects of eggs for a healthy and sustainable consumption: A narrative review. Food Sci. Nutr., Vol. 13. 10.1002/fsn3.70285
Franco, D., D. Rois, A. Arias, J.R. Justo, F.J. Marti-Quijal and J.M. Lorenzo et al, 2020. Effect of breed and diet type on the freshness and quality of the eggs: A comparison between Mos (indigenous Galician breed) and Isa brown hens. Foods, Vol. 9. 10.3390/foods9030342
Jiang, C., R. Chen, X. Shi, L. Zhuang, C. Zhou and J. Zheng et al., 2023. Effects of breeds on the content of functional nutrition in eggs. Animals, Vol. 13. 10.3390/ani13193066
Rashid, M.A., M. Rasheduzzaman, M.S.K. Sarker, S. Faruque, M.S. Palash and N.R. Sarker, 2020. Small-scale turkey farming in bangladesh: Farming practices, profitability and supply chain mapping. Agric. Sci., Vol. 2. 10.30560/as.v2n2p28
Hossain, M.A., B. Dey, A. Lahiry, T. Ahmed, M. Akter and S.C. Das et al., 2024. A comprehensive survey on the present scenario and future production potentials of small-scale turkey farming in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 53: 40-54.
Bhuiyan, A.K.F.H., M.S.A. Bhuiyan and G.K. Deb, 2005. Indigenous chicken genetic resources in bangladesh: Current status and future outlook. Anim. Genetic Resour., 36: 73-84.
Tesakul, S., W. Mitsuwan, Y. Morita and W. Kitpipit, 2025. Effects of heat stress on egg performance in laying hens under hot and humid conditions. Vet. World, 18: 851-858.
Sun, C., J. Liu, N. Yang and G. Xu, 2019. Egg quality and egg albumen property of domestic chicken, duck, goose, turkey, quail, and pigeon. Poult. Sci., 98: 4516-4521.
Onyenweaku, E.O., H.N. Ene-Obong, I.O. Williams and C.O. Nwaehujor, 2018. Comparison of nutritional composition of bird egg varieties found in southern Nigeria: A preliminary study. Food Nutr. Sci., 9: 868-879.
Hisasaga, C., S.E. Griffin and K.J. Tarrant, 2020. Survey of egg quality in commercially available table eggs. Poult. Sci., 99: 7202-7206.
Zhang, J., X. Gao, W. Zheng, P. Wang, Z. Duan and G. Xu, 2023. Dynamic changes in egg quality, heritability and correlation of these traits and yolk nutrient throughout the entire laying cycle. Foods, Vol. 12. 10.3390/foods12244472
Adeoye, A.A., O.O. Oyeleye, R.A. Olorunsola, P. Akinleye and J.B. Ojajuni, 2023. Storage duration impacts on nutritional composition and quality of table eggs. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 52: 15-21.
Yi, L., J. Zhu, W. Cheng, Y. Xie, M. Hao and S. Zhao et al., 2025. Quality, chemical composition, and amino acids of eggs in lohmann pink‐shell laying hens and dongxiang green‐shell laying hens. Vet. Med. Sci., Vol. 12. 10.1002/vms3.70674
Sarma, M., R. Islam, K.P. Kalita, J.D. Mahanta, B.K. Sarmah and B.N. Bhattacharyya, 2020. Effect of seasons on carcass characteristics of broiler chicken under small scale production system. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 8: 776-781.
Cheng, X. and Z. Ning, 2023. Research progress on bird eggshell quality defects: A review. Poult. Sci., Vol. 102. 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102283
Kpomasse, C.C., O.E. Oke, F.M. Houndonougbo and K. Tona, 2021. Broiler production challenges in the tropics: A review. Vet. Med. Sci., 7: 831-842.
Gobezie, E., A. Timotiwos and G. Simeneh, 2025. Effects of heat stress on growth performance, egg production, egg quality, and potential controlling strategies in layer chicken: A review. World's Vet. J., 15: 1130-1137.
Cooke, R.F., C.L. Daigle, P. Moriel, S.B. Smith, L.O. Tedeschi and J.M.B. Vendramini, 2020. Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: Social, nutritional, and carcass quality considerations. J. Anim. Sci., Vol. 98. 10.1093/jas/skaa014
Goto, T., S. Shimamoto, M. Takaya, S. Sato, K. Takahashi and D. Ijiri et al., 2021. Impact on genetic differences among various chicken breeds on free amino acid contents of egg yolk and albumen. Sci. Rep., Vol. 11. 10.1038/s41598-021-81660-3
Adhikari, S., M. Schop, I.J.M. de Boer and T. Huppertz, 2022. Protein quality in perspective: A review of protein quality metrics and their applications. Nutr., Vol. 14. 10.3390/nu14050947
Shafey, T.M., A.H. Mahmoud, A.A. Alsobayel and M.A. Abouheif, 2014. Effects of in ovo administration of amino acids on hatchability and performance of meat chickens. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 123-130.
Williams, K.C, 1992. Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World's Poult. Sci. J., 48: 5-16.
Moore, S., D.H. Spackman and W.H. Stein, 1958. Chromatography of amino acids on sulfonated polystyrene resins. an improved system. Anal. Chem., 30: 1185-1190.
Domínguez, R., P. Borrajo and J.M. Lorenzo, 2015. The effect of cooking methods on nutritional value of foal meat. J. Food Compos. Anal., 43: 61-67.
Pardo, J.I.S., A.G. Ariza, J.M.L. Jurado, J.V.D. Bermejo and M.E.C. Vallejo, 2025. Characterization of the internal quality of turkey eggs according to their commercial grading. Vet. Anim. Sci., Vol. 29. 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100470
Portillo-Salgado, R., B. Ruiz-Sesma, P. Mendoza-Nazar, J.G. Herrera-Haro, J. Bautista-Ortega and F.A. Cigarroa-Vázquez, 2020. Analysis of quality and prediction of external and internal egg traits in Mexican native turkey hens. Emir. J. Food Agric., 32: 647-652.
Abacı, S.H., T. Tunç, H. Önder, K. Erensoy and M. Sarıca, 2023. Examination of the relationships between internal and external egg quality traits: A structural equation model. Turk. J. Agric. - Food Sci. Technol., 11: 2446-2451.
Wijedasa, W.M.R.M., Y.H.S.T. Wickramasinghe, J.K. Vidanarachchi and S.M.C. Himali, 2020. Comparison of egg quality characteristics of different poultry species. J. Agric. Sci., 12: 331-342.
Maxwell, T.H., 2012. The eggshell: Structure, composition and mineralization. Front. Biosci., 17: 1266-1280.
Mine, Y., 2007. Egg proteins and peptides in human health-chemistry, bioactivity and production. Curr. Pharm. Design, 13: 875-884.
Stadelman, W.J., D. Newkirk and L. Newby, 1995. Egg science and technology. 4th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, ISBN: 9781560228554. Pages: 608.
Medina-Cruz, M.F., D. Zaráte-Contreras, R.V. Pérez-Ruíz, M.B. Arce-Vázquez, A.A. Rayas-Amor and R.G. Cruz-Monterrosa et al., 2024. Nutritional characteristics of different types of eggs. Agro Productividad, Vol. 12. 10.32854/agrop.v16i12.2788
Roberts, J.R., 2004. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci., 41: 161-177.
Mori, H., M. Takaya, K. Nishimura and T. Goto, 2020. Breed and feed affect amino acid contents of egg yolk and eggshell color in chickens. Poult. Sci., 99: 172-178.
Gyawali, D. and T. Goto, 2025. Assessing the genetic and environmental factors on egg amino acid traits in chickens: A review. Anim. s, Vol. 15. 10.3390/ani15111554
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Md Sazedul K. Sarker, Nushrat N. Lisa, Biswajit Kumar Biswas, Farhana Sharmin, Umme S. Ety , Sadman S. Zihan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
