Effect of Sex, Bird Size and Marination on Duck Breast Meat Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.191.195Keywords:
Carcass size, duck breast, marination, meat qualityAbstract
Several factors may affect poultry breast meat quality, both intrinsic characteristics (age, sex, size and strain) and external influences (carcass aging time postmortem before deboning, fillet marination and cooking method). Commercial duck processors are now expanding into the deboned breast meat markets but very little research is available on duck meat quality as compared to other poultry species. Therefore, the following study was conducted to determine the effect of duck sex, size and fillet marination on breast meat quality. Duck rearing, processing and carcass deboning were conducted at a commercial facility. Carcasses were kept separate by sex and were then sized to 1.6 kg (S), 2.0 kg (M) and 2.5 kg (L) after chilling. After 6 h aging on the carcass, breast fillets were removed and half of the fillets from each sex-size category were marinated while the other half of the fillets (unmarinated) were held as controls. A total of 360 fillets were produced, 30 in each of 12 categories (2 sexes X 3 sizes X 2 treatments). At the laboratory, fillets were weighed, evaluated for raw color, cooked, reweighed, evaluated for cooked color and sheared via Warner-Bratzler (WB). Uncooked and cooked fillet weights were significantly affected by bird size (p<0.05). Marination increased fillet cook yield compared to control fillets (73.5% versus 69.1%, respectively) and decreased WB shear values (2.2 kg versus 3.2 kg, respectively). Less force was required to shear the first slice using WB as compared to the second WB slice (2.4 and 3.0 kg, respectively). Lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) values were lower in uncooked fillets from females than males ducks and marination decreased raw fillet L* values and cooked b* values for both sexes. Results showed that sex, carcass size and marination affect duck breast meat quality.
References
Acton, J.C. and R.L. Dick, 1986. Protecting color in fresh and processed meats. Natl. Provisioner, 194: 12-17.
Ali, M.S., G.H. Kang, H.S. Yang, J.Y. Jeong, Y.H. Hwang, G.B. Park and S.T. Joo, 2007. A comparison of meat characteristics between duck and chicken breast. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 20: 1002-1006.
Ali, M.S., H.S. Yang, J.Y. Jeong, S.H. Moon, Y.H. Hwang, G.B. Park and S.T. Joo, 2008. Effect of chilling temperature of carcass on breast meat quality of duck. Poult. Sci., 87: 1860-1867.
Alvarado, C.Z. and A.R. Sams, 2000. The influence of postmortem electrical stimulation on rigor mortis development, calpastatin activity and tenderness in broiler and duck pectoralis. Poult. Sci., 79: 1364-1368.
Baeza, E., M.R. Salichon, G. Marche and H. Juin, 1998. Effect of sex on growth, technological and organoleptic characteristics of the Muscovy duck breast muscle. Br. Poult. Sci., 39: 398-403.
Baeza, E., M.R. Salichon, G. Marche, N. Wacrenier, B. Dominguez and J. Culioli, 2000. Effects of age and sex on the structural, chemical and technological characteristics of mule duck meat. Br. Poult. Sci., 41: 300-307.
Chartrin, P., K. Meteau, H. Juin, M.D. Bernadet and G. Guy et al., 2006. Effects of intramuscular fat levels on sensory characteristics of duck breast meat. Poult. Sci., 85: 914-922.
Chou, R.G.R., T.F. Tseng and M.T. Chen, 1997. Acceleration of post‐mortem changes in Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhynchos) breast muscle by lactic acid marination. Br. Poult. Sci., 38: 78-83.
Fletcher, D.L., 2002. Poultry meat quality. World's Poult. Sci. J., 58: 131-145.
Kim, H.W., S.H. Lee, J.H. Choi, Y.S. Choi and H.Y. Kim et al., 2012. Effects of rigor state, thawing temperature, and processing on the physicochemical properties of frozen duck breast muscle. Poult. Sci., 91: 2662-2667.
Lin, Y.C., W.T. Chen and R.G. Chou, 2000. Postmortem changes in mule duck muscle marinated in red wine. J. Food Sci., 65: 906-908.
Lyon, B.G. and C.E. Lyon, 1991. Research note: Shear value ranges by instron Warner-Bratzler and single-blade Allo-Kramer devices that correspond to sensory tenderness. Poult. Sci., 70: 188-191.
Omojola, A.B., 2007. Carcass and organoleptic characteristics of duck meat as influenced by breed and sex. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 329-334.
Qiao, M., D.L. Fletcher, D.P. Smith and J.K. Northcutt, 2002. Effects of raw broiler breast meat color variation on marination and cooked meat quality. Poult. Sci., 2002: 276-280.
SAS., 2008. SAS for Windows, Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
Smith, D.P. and J.C. Acton, 2010. Marination, Cooking and Curing of Poultry Products. In: Poultry Meat Processing, Owens, C.M., C. Alvarado and A.R. Sams (Eds.). 2nd Edn., Chapter 15, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., ISBN-13: 978-1420091892, pp: 311-336.
Smith, D.P., D.L. Fletcher and C.M. Papa, 1991. Evaluation of duckling breast meat subjected to different methods of further processing and cooking. J. Muscle Foods, 2: 305-310.
Smith, D.P. and D.L. Fletcher, 1992. Duckling and chicken processing yields and breast meat tenderness. Poult. Sci., 71: 197-202.
Smith, D.P., D.L. Fletcher, R.J. Buhr and R.S. Beyer, 1993. Pekin duckling and broiler chicken Pectoralis muscle structure and composition. Poult. Sci., 72: 202-208.
Tsai, L.L., N.J. Yen and R.G.R. Chou, 2012. Changes in Muscovy duck breast muscle marinated with ginger extract. Food Chem., 130: 316-320.
USDA., 2011. Poultry slaughter. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), January 25, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.