A One Year Study of Newly Constructed Broiler Houses for the Prevalence of Campylobacter


Authors

  • K.N. Eberle Departmnet of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • J.D. Davis Ag and Bio Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • J.P. Purswell USDA-ARS, Poultry Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • H.M. Parker Departmnet of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • C.D. McDaniel Departmnet of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • A.S. Kiess Departmnet of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.29.36

Keywords:

Broiler house, campylobacter, food safety, poultry

Abstract

In 2009, the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service announced the development of new pathogen reduction performance standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter both on-farm and in the processing plant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of Campylobacter in 3 newly constructed broiler houses for the first 4 flocks placed. Litter and fecal samples were collected from each house at 0, 28 and 48 d of production. Samples were serially diluted and spread onto Campy Cefex agar plates. Two 40 mL water samples were collected each production day and filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane before being placed onto a Campy Cefex agar plate. All plates were purged with a microaerophilic gas and incubated for 36 h at 42°C. Individual plates were screened for characteristic Campylobacter colonies and suspect colonies were confirmed using a latex agglutination kit. An additional 50 g of litter was collected from the evaporative cooling inlets, middle and tunnel ventilation fans to determine litter moisture and pH. Inside and outside temperatures were also collected. Out of 2300 litter, 900 fecal and 45 water samples, only 5, 6 and 1 of the collected samples, respectively, were confirmed Campylobacter positive. The middle of the house contained a higher litter moisture level (37%) than the evaporative cooling inlet end (33%) and tunnel ventilation fan end (34%) (p<0.05). Litter pH was not different across days, locations or flocks. Temperature averaged 26.8oC inside and 27.6oC outside. In conclusion, the newly constructed houses did not show a high prevalence of Campylobacter. Litter moisture was at levels conducive for Campylobacter growth. The high litter pH and low temperatures, along with other on-farm management strategies and the fact the broiler houses were brand new, may have suppressed Campylobacter’s ability to colonize the litter.

References

American Meat Institute, 2009. U.S. meat and poultry production and consumption: An overview. http://www.meatami.com/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/82919.

AOAC., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.

Bell, D.D. and W.J. Weaver, 2002. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. 5th Edn., Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA.

Blake, J.P. and J.B. Hess, 2001. Litter treatments for poultry. Alabama Cooperative Extension System. https://store.aces.edu/ItemDetail.aspx?ProductID=13892.

Bucklin, R. A., J.P. Jacob, F.B. Mather, J.D. Leary and I.A. Nass, 1998. Tunnel ventilation of broiler houses. University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PS/PS04100.pdf.

CDC., 2008. Campylobacter. Center for Disease Control. http://www.cdc.gov/nczved/divisions/dfbmd/diseases/campylobacter/.

Czarick, M. and B. Fairchild, 2003. Minimizing wet litter problems in houses with evaporative cooling pads. Poultry Housing Tips, vol. 15, No. 5. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. http://www.poultryventilation.com/sites/default/files/tips/2003/vol15n5.pdf.

Czarick, M. and B. Fairchild, 2006. Fresh bedding..cool chicks. Poultry Housing Tips, Vol. 18 No. 4. The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. http://www.poultryventilation.com/sites/default/files/tips/2006/vol18n4.pdf.

Department of Sustainable Natural Resources, 1990. Soil survey standard test method: Soil moisture content. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/soils/testmethods/mc.pdf.

Doyle, M.P., 1989. Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

USDA, 2000. ERS updates foodborne illness costs. Economic Research Service. http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Foodborne-Illness-Costs-USDA.htm.

Genigegorgis, C., M. Hassuneh and P. Coolins, 1986. Campylobacter jejuni infection on poultry farms and its effect on poultry meat contamination during slaughtering. J. Food Prot., 49: 895-903.

Keener, K.M., M.P. Bashor, P.A. Curtis, B.W. Sheldon and S. Kathariou, 2004. Comprehensive review of Campylobacter and poultry processing. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 3: 105-116.

Newell, D.G. and C. Fearnley, 2003. Sources of Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 69: 4343-4351.

Oosterom, J., S. Notermans, H. Karman and G.B. Engels, 1983. Origin and prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry processing. J. Food Prot., 46: 339-344.

Patrick, M.E., L.E. Christiansen, M. Waino, S. Ethelberg, H. Madsen and H.C. Wegener, 2004. Effects of climate on incidence of Campylobacter spp. in humans and prevalence in broiler flocks in Denmark. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70: 7474-7480.

Quinones-Ramirez, E.I., C. Vazquez-Salinas, O.R. Rodas-Suarez, M.O. Ramos-Flores and R. Rodriguez-Montano, 2000. Frequency of isolation of Campylobacter from roasted chicken samples from Mexico City. J. Food Prot., 63: 117-119.

Rothrock, M.J.Jr., K.L. Cook, J.G. Warren and K. Sistani, 2008. The effect of alum addition on microbial communities in poultry litter. Poult. Sci., 87: 1493-1503.

Shanker, S., A. Lee and T.C. Sorrell, 1990. Horizontal transmission of Campylobacter jejuni amongst broiler chicks: Experimental studies. Epidemiol. Infect., 104: 101-110.

Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0070609259, Pages: 481.

Stern, N.J., M.A. Myszewski, H.M. Barnhart and D.W. Dreesen, 1997. Flagellin A gene restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler production sources. Avian Dis., 41: 899-905.

Tam, C.C., L.C. Rodrigues, S.J. O'Brien and S. Hajat, 2006. Temperature dependence of reported Campylobacter infection in England, 1989-1999. Epidemiol. Infect., 134: 119-125.

Terzich, M., M.J. Pope, T.E. Cherry and J. Hollinger, 2000. Survey of pathogens in poultry litter in the United States. J. Applied Poult. Sci., 9: 287-291.

USDA, 1996. Pathogen reduction; Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems, final rule. 9 CFR 304, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service.

USDA, 2011. New performance standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter in chilled carcasses at young chicken and turkey slaughter establishments. United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Washington, DC.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Eberle, K., Davis, J., Purswell, J., Parker, H., McDaniel, C., & Kiess , A. (2012). A One Year Study of Newly Constructed Broiler Houses for the Prevalence of Campylobacter. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.29.36

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>