A Comparison of Humoral Immune Function in Response to a Killed Newcastles Vaccine Challenge in Caged Vs. Free-range Hy-line Brown Layers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.315.319Keywords:
Cage, free-range, layers, zhumoral immune functionAbstract
The relationship between immune function and disease risk may be greatly influenced by an organism’s response to chronic stressors including those that are environmentally induced. Measurements of stress-induced immune alterations have previously been made in poultry species by utilizing hematological and immunological indices. To ascertain the effects of alternative layer housing management methods on humoral immune function, Hy-line Brown hens housed on range (n = 15) or in battery style cages (n = 20) were inoculated with a killed Newcastle′s vaccine. Blood serum samples were taken prior to injection and for three consecutive weeks following injection to assess antibody production. Antibody production was significantly higher in caged hens in comparison to free-range hens at pre-injection (1.69±0.70 vs. 0.069±0.069) (p<0.0001) and post-injection week one (2.26±0.77 vs. 0.145±0.25) (p<0.0001), week two (8.00±2.98 vs. 4.38±2.94) (p<0.001) and week 3 (9.24±2.56 vs. 6.69±3.86) (p<0.05). Additionally, caged hens exhibited a significantly higher level (p<0.0001) of total antibody production (5.30±0.23) throughout the immune challenge compared to free-range hens (2.82±0.26). Caged hens exhibited significantly higher H:L ratios (2.34±0.86 vs. 1.75±0.57) (p<0.05) during post-injection week 2 which correlated with the greatest difference in antibody production observed between the two groups of hens. This data indicated that environmental management methods utilized in layer hen production may influence both levels of humoral immune function and heterophil:lymphocyte ratios.
References
Anderson, K.E., 2009. Overview of natural and organic egg production: Looking back to the future. J. Applied Poult. Res., 18: 348-354.
Anderson, K.E., 2009. Single production cycle report of the 37th North carolina layer performance and management test. North Carolina State University, Cooperative Extension, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Appleby, M.C., 1998. Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior. Poult. Sci., 77: 1828-1832.
Appleby, M.C., B.O. Hughes and A.H. Elson, 1992. Poultry Production Systems: Behsviour, Managetment and Welfare. CAB Internationl, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
Curtis, S.E. and W.R. Stricklin, 1991. The importance of animal cognition in agricultural animal production systems: An overview. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 5001-5007.
Dohms, J.E. and A. Metz, 1991. Stress-mechanisms of immuno-suppression. Vet. Immunol. Immunophysiol., 30: 89-109.
Dohms, J.E. and Y.M. Saif, 1984. Guest editorial: Criteria for evaluating immunosuppression. Avian Dis., 28: 305-310.
Erhard, M.H., H. Ozpinar, T. Bilal, I. Abas, C. Kutay, H. Eseceli and M. Stangassinger, 2000. The humoral immune response and the productivity of laying hens kept on ground or in cages. Altern. Lab. Anim., 28: 699-705.
Gross, W.B. and H.S. Siegel, 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis., 27: 972-979.
Hilbrich, P., 1985. History of poultry health. Proceeding of the 2nd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, (ESPW’85), Worlds Poultry Science Association, Celle, Germany, pp: 48-54.
Houwen, B., 2000. Blood film preparation and staining procedures. Lab. Hematol., 6: 1-7.
Maxwell, M.H. and G.W. Robertson, 1998. The avian heterophil leucocyte: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 54: 155-178.
McEwen, B.S. and J.C. Wingfield, 2003. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm. Behav., 43: 2-15.
McFarlane, J.M. and S.E. Curtis, 1989. Multiple concurrent stressors in chicks. 3. Effects on plasma corticosterone and the heterophil: Lymphocyte ratio. Poult. Sci., 68: 522-527.
Miller, D.B. and J.P. O'Callaghan, 2002. Neuroendocrine aspects of the response to stress. Metabolism, 51: 5-10.
Riddell, C., C.F. Helmboldt, E.P. Singsen and L.D. Matterson, 1968. Bone pathology of birds affected with cage layer fatigue. Avian Dis., 12: 285-297.
Rodenburg, T.B., F.A. Tuyttens, B. Sonck, K. De Reu, L. Herman and J. Zoons, 2005. Welfare, health and hygience of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems. J. Applied Anim. Welfare Sci., 8: 211-226.
Sapolsky, R., 1994. Individual difference and the stress response. Seminars Neurosci., 6: 261-269.
SAS Institute Inc., 2000-2009. SAS 9.2 Help and Documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Shini, S., 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 357-360.
Siegle, H.S., 1985. Immunological responses as indicators of stress. World Poult. Sci. J., 41: 36-44.
Sumner, D.A., 2008. Economic Effects of Proposed Restrictions on Egg-Laying Hen Housing in California. University of California Agricultural Issues Center, UC Davis, California, Pages: 105.
Tactacan, G.B., W. Guenter, N.J. Lewis, J.C. Rodriguez-Lecompte and J.D. House, 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult. Sci., 88: 698-707.
Tauson, R., 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci., 77: 1820-1827.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
