Effects of Dietary Regimens and Brown-Egg Pullet Strain on Growth and Development


Authors

  • K.E. Anderson Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7608, Raleigh, 27695-7608, NC, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.205.211

Keywords:

Chicken, growth, pullet, step-down protein, step-up protein

Abstract

This study consisted of; two strains of brown-egg pullets, the Hy-Line (HB) and H&N (BN) Brown were raised on three different dietary regimens resulting in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The three different regimens were a standard Step-down Protein Regimen (SDP) comprised of a 20% CP Starter, 0-6 week, 18% CP Grower 1, 7-12 week and 16% CP Grower 2, 13-18 week; a Step-up Protein Regimen (SUP9) comprised of a 12% CP Starter, 0-9 week, 16% CP Grower 2, 10-16 week and 18% CP Grower 1, 17-18 week and a Step-up Protein Regimen (SUP12) comprised of a 12% CP Starter, 0-12 week, 16% CP Grower 2, 13-16 week and 18% CP Grower 1, 17-18 week. The pullets were housed in an environmentally controlled rearing facility with trideck battery cages. Feed consumption and body weights were measured bi-weekly and mortality was recorded daily. At 17 week of age a sample of 20 pullets from each strain and regimen combination were randomly selected and brought to the laboratory for body composition analysis. At 18 week the HB and BN strains only differed in livability with the HB having a 4.2% greater (p<0.05) liveability than the BN pullets. There was a stepwise reduction (p<0.05) in total protein intake from the SDP, SUP9 and SUP12, however, energy, Ca, P and lysine consumption were comparable. The SUP9 and SUP12 feeding regimens resulted in significantly (p<0.05) lower BW than the SDP regimen pullets. The SUP12 regimen significantly reduced sternum length below that obtained with the SDP or SUP9 program 11.0 vs. 11.2 and 11.3 cm, respectively. Tibial breaking strength was no different between the strains or regimens. This study shows that pullets reared on SUP regimens would have lower body weights with few differences in body composition percentages. Indicating that reduced dietary protein and energy would result in smaller pullets with comparable body composition.

References

Anderson, K.E., G.B. Havenstein and J. Brake, 1995. Effects of strain and rearing dietary regimens on brown-egg pullet growth and strain, rearing dietary regimens, density and feeder space effects on subsequent laying performance. Poult. Sci., 74: 1079-1092.

Anderson, K.E., 2007. Report on pullet rearing period. Procceding of the 37th North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test, Jan. 2008, North Carolina, pp: 1-17.

Anderson, K.E., 1992. Report on the pullet rearing period. 30th North Carolina Layer Perform. Manage. Test, 30: 1-24.

Bish, C.L., W.L. Beane, P.L. Ruszler and J.A. Cherry, 1984. Modified step-up protein feeding regimens for egg-type chickens. 1. Growth and production performance. Poult. Sci., 63: 2450-2457.

Blaylock, L.G., 1956. The protein requirement of growing birds. Poult. Sci., 35: 1133-1133.

Camberlain, F.W., 1943. Atlas of Avian Anatomy: Osteology, Arthrology and Myology. Michigan State College, Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing, MI, USA., pp:1-213.

Christmas, R.B., C.R. Douglas, L.W. Kalch and R.H. Harms, 1982. The effects of low protein pullet growing diets on performance of laying hens housed in the fall. Poult. Sci., 61: 2103-2106.

Connor, J.K. and H.W. Burton, 1971. The performance of laying hens fed various dietary protein levels in the growing period and first laying year. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 11: 161-168.

Crenshaw, T.D., E.R.Jr. Peo, A.J. Lewis, B.D. Moser and D. Olsen, 1981. Influence of age, sex and calcium and phosphorus levels on the mechanical properties of various bones in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 52: 1319-1329.

Doran, B.H., W.F. Krueger and J.W. Bradley, 1983. Effect of step-down and step-up protein-energy feeding systems on egg-type pullet growth and laying performance. Poult. Sci., 62: 255-262.

Douglas, C.R., D.M. Welch and R.H. Harms, 1985. A step-down protein program for commercial pullets. Poult. Sci., 64: 1137-1142.

Lee, P.J.W., A.L. Gulliver and T.R. Morris, 1971. A quantitative analysis of the literature concerning the restricted feeding of growing pullets. Br. Poult. Sci., 12: 413-437.

Leeson, S., 1986. Rearing leghorn pullets. Proceeding of the 47th Minnesota Nutrition Conference and Monsanto Technical Symposium, Sept. 22-24, Minneapolis, MN, USA., pp: 227-234.

Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1978. Voluntary food restriction of laying hens mediated through dietary self-selection. Br. Poult. Sci., 19: 417-424.

Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1979. Step-up protein diets for growing pullets. Poult. Sci., 58: 681-686.

Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1980. Production and carcass characteristics of white leghorn pullets fed conventional or step-up protein diets. Poult. Sci., 59: 1839-1851.

Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1984. Effects of cage density and diet energy concentration on the performance of growing leghorn pullets subjected to early induced maturity. Poult. Sci., 63: 875-882.

Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1984. Influence of nutritional modification on skeletal size of leghorn and broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci., 63: 1222-1228.

Robinson, F.E., W.L. Beane, C.L. Bish, P.L. Ruszler and J.L. Baker, 1986. Modified step-up protein feeding regimens for egg-type chickens. 2. Protein level influence on growth and production performance. Poult. Sci., 65: 122-129.

SAS Institute Inc., 2004. SAS 9.1.3 Help and Documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Anderson, K. (2010). Effects of Dietary Regimens and Brown-Egg Pullet Strain on Growth and Development. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.205.211