Physicochemical Properties of Malaysian Commercial Chicken Sausages


Authors

  • Nurul Huda Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Lim Hoo Wei Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Alistair T.L. Jean Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Ishamri Ismail Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.954.958

Keywords:

Calcium content, colour, commercial sausages, proximate composition, sodium content, textural properties

Abstract

Sausage is becoming more popular to the Malaysian consumers. A study on quality characteristics for chicken sausages marketed in Malaysia was conducted to gauge the trend of marketed sausages today. A total of ten samples of chicken sausages from different brands were analyzed to determine the proximate composition, calcium and sodium contents, colour, folding test and textural properties (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness and shear force). The moisture, protein, fat and ash contents for chicken sausages were significantly different, in the range of 56.48-68.85%, 7.03-14.14%, 4.91-18.48% and 2.17-3.30%, respectively. The range of carbohydrate content was 6.69-21.59%. The calcium and sodium contents were varied in chicken sausages. The lightness value (L*) of sausage was significantly different among the samples in the range of 44.42-65.54. All chicken sausages samples tested in this study show good gel strength with their folding test at more than 4.0. The hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness and shear force ranged between 3.84-7.25 kg, 12.79-15.65 mm, 0.25-0.41 ratio, 1.28-2.58 kg, 16.81-33.01 kg.mm and 0.58-1.95 kg, respectively. The results of this analysis showed that sausages produced by different manufacturers will varied significantly in quality and physicochemical properties.

References

AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Babji, A.S. and M.Y. Seri-Chempaka, 1995. The nutritional value of some processed meat products in Malaysia. Malaysian J. Nutr., 1: 83-94.

Babji, A.S., S.Y. Chin, M.Y. Seri-Chempaka and A.R. Alina, 1998. Quality of mechanically deboned chicken meat frankfurter incorporated with chicken skin. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 49: 319-326.

Bigner-George, M.E. and B.W. Berry, 2000. Thawing prior to cooking affects sensory, shear force and cooking properties of beef patties. J. Food Sci., 65: 2-8.

Caceres, E., M.L. Garcia and M.D. Selgas, 2006. Design of a new cooked meat sausage enriched with calcium. Meat Sci., 73: 368-377.

Cross, H.R., P.R. Durland and S.C. Seidemen, 1986. Sensory Qualities of Meat. In: Muscle as Food, Bechtel, P.J. (Ed.). Academic Press, Inc., Florida, USA., pp: 279-320.

Dingstad, G.I., E. Kubberod, T. Naes and B. Egelandsdal, 2005. Critical quality constraints of sensory attributes in frankfurter-type sausages, to be applied in optimization models. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 38: 665-676.

Garcia-Segovia, P., A. Andres-Bello and J. Martinez-Monzo, 2007. Effect of cooking method on mechanical properties, color and structure of beef muscle (M. pectoralis). J. Food Eng., 80: 813-821.

Hoffman, L.C., M. Muller, S.W.P. Cloete and D. Schmidt, 2003. Comparison of six crossbred lamb types: Sensory, physical and nutritional meat quality characteristics. Meat Sci., 65: 1265-1274.

Hsu, S.Y. and H.Y. Chung, 2001. Effect of k-carrageenan, salt, phosphate and fat on qualities of low fat emulsified meatballs. J. Food Eng., 47: 115-121.

Huda, N., A. Abdullah and A.S. Babji, 2000. Chemical composition and quality of Malaysian fish balls. Proceedings of the Seminar Bersama ITB-UKM IV, April 12-13, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, pp: 205-211.

Nurul, H., T.L.J. Alistair, H.W. Lim and I. Noryati, 2010. Quality characteristics of Malaysian commercial beef frankfurters. Int. Food Res. J., 17: 469-476.

Lanier, T.C., 1992. Measurement of Surimi Composition and Functional Properties. In: Surimi Technology, Lanier, T.C. and C.M. Lee (Ed.). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA., ISBN: 0824784707, pp: 123-163.

Li, R.R., J.A. Carpenter and R. Cheney, 1998. Sensory and instrumental properties of smoked sausage made with Mechanically Separated Poultry (MSP) meat and wheat protein. J. Food Sci., 63: 923-929.

Pereira, N.R., C.R.T. Tarley, M. Matsushita and N.E. de Souza, 2000. Proximate composition and fatty acid profile in Brazilian poultry sausages. J. Food Comp. Anal., 13: 915-920.

Rahman, S.A., M.S.A. Bahrein, T.W. Abdullah and A.S. Babji, 1997. Komposisi proksimat dan mineral dalam sosej ayam. Sains Malaysiana, 26: 31-37.

Resurreccion, A.V.A., 2004. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Sci., 66: 11-20.

Downloads

Published

2010-09-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Huda, N., Wei, L. H., Jean, A. T., & Ismail, I. (2010). Physicochemical Properties of Malaysian Commercial Chicken Sausages. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(10), 954–958. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.954.958