Effect of Chicken and Duck Meat Ratio on the Properties of Sausage


Authors

  • Nurul Huda Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • Ooi Jun Lin Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • Yong Chiew Ping Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • Tina Nurkhoeriyati Fish and Meat Processing Laboratory, Food Technology Programme, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.550.555

Keywords:

Physico-chemical properties, processed poultry products, sausages, sensory evaluation

Abstract

In this study, sausages with different ratios of chicken to duck meat were produced: A (100:0), B (75:25), C (50:50), D (25:75) and E (0:100). Analyses of the physicochemical properties and chemical contents of the samples were carried out. The proximate contents were significantly different (p<0.05) among all samples with different formulations. In order, from samples A to E, moisture contents exhibited a decreasing trend, while protein, fat and ash contents showed increasing trends as the fraction of duck meat was increased in the formulation. Sausages having higher ratios of duck meat had a darker color, with the L* value decreasing from sample A to E. All the samples showed significant differences in the texture analysis. The texture of sausages became harder when more duck meat was incorporated in the formulation.

References

Ahhmed, A.M., S. Kawahara, K. Ohta, K. Nakade, T. Soeda and M. Muguruma, 2007. Differentiation in improvements of gel strength in chicken and beef sausages induced by transglutaminase. Meat Sci., 76: 455-462.

Ali, M.S., H.S. Yang, J.Y. Jeong, S.H. Moon, Y.H. Hwang, G.B. Park and S.T. Joo, 2008. Effect of chilling temperature of carcass on breast meat quality of duck. Poult. Sci., 87: 1860-1867.

Andres, S.C., M.E. Garcia, N.E. Zaritzky and A.N. Califano, 2006. Storage stability of low-fat chicken sausages. J. Food Eng., 72: 311-319.

AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Bourne, M.C., 1978. Texture profile analyis. Food Technol., 32: 62-66.

Caceres, E., M.L. Garcia and M.D. Selgas, 2006. Design of a new cooked meat sausage enriched with calcium. Meat Sci., 73: 368-377.

Candogan, K. and N. Kolsarici, 2003. The effects of carrageenan and pectin on some quality characteristics of low-fat beef frankfurters. Meat Sci., 64: 199-206.

Chang, H.C. and J.A. Carpenter, 1997. Optimizing quality of frankfurters containing oat bran and added water. J. Food Sci., 62: 194-197.

Crosland, A.R., R.L.S. Patterson, R.C. Higman, C.A. Stewart and K.D. Hargin, 1994. Investigation of methods to detect mechanically recovered meat in meat products-I: Chemical composition. Meat Sci., 40: 289-302.

El-Magoli, S.B., S. Laroia and P.M.T. Hansen, 1996. Flavor and texture characteristics of low fat ground beef patties formulated with whey protein concentrate. Meat Sci., 42: 179-193.

Honikel, K.O., 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci., 49: 447-457.

Lin, S., H.E. Huff and F. Hsieh, 2002. Extruder responses, sensory characteristics and structural properties of high moisture soy protein meat analog. J. Food Sci., 67: 1066-1072.

Meilgaard, M.C., B.T. Carr and G.V. Civille, 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 3rd Edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN: 9781003040729, Pages: 416.

Van der Meulen, S.J. and G. de Dikken, 2004. Duck Keeping in the Tropics. 2nd Edn., Agromisa Foundation, Wageningen, ISBN: 90-77073-85-X, pp: 1-80.

Pereira, N.R., C.R.T. Tarley, M. Matsushita and N.E. de Souza, 2000. Proximate composition and fatty acid profile in Brazilian poultry sausages. J. Food Comp. Anal., 13: 915-920.

Pietrasik, Z., 1999. Effect of content of protein, fat and modified starch on binding textural characteristics and colour of comminuted scalded sausages. Meat Sci., 51: 17-25.

Savic, I.V., 1985. Small-scale Sausage Production. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

Serdaroglu, M. and O. Degirmencioglu, 2004. Effects of fat level (5%, 10%, 20%) and corn flour (0%, 2%, 4%) on some properties of Turkish type meatballs (koefte). Meat Sci., 68: 291-296.

USDA., 2008. National nutrient database for standard reference. Release 21, Agricultural Research Service, USA. http://ndb.nal.usda.gov//.

Lawrie, R.A., 1998. Lawries Meat Science. 6th Edn., Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, pp: 1-313.

FAO, 2009. Livestock Primary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Jin, S.K., I.S. Kim, S.J. Kim, K.J. Jeong, Y.J. Choi and S.J. Hur, 2007. Effect of muscle type and washing times on physico-chemical characteristics and qualities of surimi. J. Food Eng., 81: 618-623.

Bhattacharyya, D., M. Sinhamahapatra and S. Biswas, 2007. Preparation of sausage from spent duck: An acceptability study. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 42: 24-29.

Downloads

Published

2010-05-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Huda, N., Lin, O. J., Ping, Y. C., & Nurkhoeriyati, T. (2010). Effect of Chicken and Duck Meat Ratio on the Properties of Sausage. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(6), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.550.555