Productive and Reproductive Performance Diversity of Indigenous Chicken in Eritrea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2026.33.50Keywords:
Effective population, Indigenous chicken ecotype, productive reproductive performance, trait preferenceAbstract
Background and Objective: Poultry production in Eritrea is predominantly traditional and relies largely on indigenous chickens (ICs). This study evaluated the productive and reproductive variability among IC ecotypes across 16 sub-regions, representing approximately 24% of the country’s administrative areas.
Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 384 households across 105 villages using structured questionnaires. Egg weight and external egg quality traits were measured using digital balances and calipers. Non-parametric variables related to broodiness management were analyzed using chi-square (χ²) tests in SPSS version 27 and visualized with DATAtab. Parametric traits, including inter-clutch period (ICP), hatchability, survivability and productivity parameters, were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test in JMP Pro 17. The influence of traditional broodiness management practices on ICP was further evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) implemented in RStudio version 4.3.0 with the glmmTMB package. Farmers’ trait preferences were quantified using the Relative Importance Index (RII), while effective population size (Ne) and inbreeding rate (ΔF) were estimated for mature flocks.
Results: Significant variation was observed in broodiness control practices (χ² = 475.36, p< 0.001), with 72% of farmers employing leg-tying, which significantly influenced ICP (F = 10.4058, p<0.001). The longest ICPs were recorded in the BAR (5.92 weeks) and GOG (4.50 weeks) ecotypes. GLMM results indicated that only traditional management practices had a significant effect on ICP (p<0.05). Across ecotypes, mean brooding frequency was 2.54 times per hen per year, with an average of 10.94 eggs set per clutch. Mean hatchability was 81.27% (range: 73.78-87.90%), while chick survivability to eight weeks averaged 51.31% (range: 45.19-61.88%). Productivity parameters showed that cockerels reached mating age at 5.55±0.04 months, while pullets attained first egg laying at 6.29±0.03 months. Hens averaged 3.39±0.045 clutches per year, 12.08±0.14 eggs per clutch and 40.77±0.70 eggs per year, with significant variation among ecotypes (p<0.0001). Mean egg weight was 44.15±0.33 g (range: 35.19-50.89 g; p<0.0001) and the mean shape index was 74.91±0.24% (p = 0.0308). Farmers ranked egg production as the most important trait in hens (RII = 0.81) and plumage colour as the most important trait in cocks (RII = 0.88). The mean effective population size was 4.6, corresponding to an inbreeding rate of 11.4% per generation.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate substantial productive and reproductive diversity among indigenous chicken ecotypes in Eritrea, highlighting opportunities for targeted genetic improvement and sustainable management strategies tailored to specific production objectives.
References
FAO, 2017. The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. 1st ed., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ISBN: 978-92-5-109551-5. Pages:163.
Coffey, C., P.E. Revollo, R. Harvey, M. Lawson, A.P. Butt and J. Thekkudan et al, 2020. Time to care: Unpaid and underpaid care work and the global inequality crisis. 1st ed., Oxfam GB for Oxfam International, Oxford, UK, ISBN: 978-1-78748-541-9. Pages:64.
Liaqat, W., C. Barutçular, M.U. Farooq, H. Ahmad, M.F. Jan and M. Li et al, 2022. Climate change in relation to agriculture: A review. Span. J. Agric. Res., Vol. 20. 10.5424/sjar/2022202-17742
Saleh, R. and M.-H. Ehlers, 2023. Exploring farmers’ perceptions of social sustainability. Environ., Dev. Sustainability, 27: 6371-6396.
FAOSTAT, 2023. Global chicken population. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[Direct Link]
Erdaw, M.M. and W.T. Beyene, 2022. Trends, prospects and the socio-economic contribution of poultry production in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 78: 835-852.
Ngeno, K., E.H.V. Waaij and A.K. Kahi, 2014. Indigenous chicken genetic resources in Kenya: Their unique attributes and conservation options for improved use. World's Poult. Sci. J., 70: 173-184.
Yonas, K., B. Sandip and T. Mestawet, 2019. Some internal and external egg quality characteristics of local and exotic chickens reared in yirgalem and hawassa towns, Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 10: 135-142.
Mujyambere, V., K. Adomako, S.O. Olympio, M. Ntawubizi, L. Nyinawamwiza and A. Conroy et al, 2022. Local chickens in East African region: Their production and potential. Poult. Sci., Vol. 101. 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101547
Habteslassie, H.A, 2018. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken and their production system in Gash Barka region of Eritrea. Master's Thesis. Hamelmalo Agricultural College.
Eritrea, MLWAES, 2020. Third National Communication of Eritrea to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
[Direct Link]
MoA,, 2023. Eritrea: Agricultural market highlights: Facts that show the country's resilience to global food crisis. Ministry of Agriculture Newsletter.
[Direct Link]
Elder, S., A. Wilkings, C. Larrea, N. Elamin and S.F.D. Cordoba, 2021. State of Sustainability Initiatives Review: Standards and Poverty Reduction. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
[Direct Link]
Jobe, M.C, 2016. Effect of the methanolic extract of Cassia abbreviata in the oxidative stress induced by overcrowding in indigenous chickens. Master's Thesis. Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Zululand.
Birhanu, M.Y., C. Ty, W. Esatu, H. Hoang, R. Theary and T. Dessie et al, 2021. Characterizing smallholder poultry production in Cambodia. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research) / International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya, ISBN: 92–9146–791–x. Pages:32.
Khaitsa, M.L., N.W. Lumutenga, C. Kobia, H. Mikiibi and M. Ruth, 2022. Use of poultry production to empower small holder women farmers in East Africa. Pathways to Afr. Feminism Dev.: J. Afr. Women Stud. Centre, 7: 182-206.
Desta, T.T. and O. Wakeyo, 2024. Reproductive characteristics of indigenous village chickens. Poult. Sci. Manage., Vol. 1. 10.1186/s44364-024-00002-x
Bettridge, J.M., A. Psifidi, Z.G. Terfa, T.T. Desta, M. Lozano-Jaramillo and R.M. Christley et al, 2018. The role of local adaptation in sustainable production of village chickens. Nat. Sustainability, 1: 574-582.
Kpomasse, C.C., Y.A.E. Kouame, O. N’nanle, F.M. Houndonougbo, K. Tona and O.E. Oke, 2023. The productivity and resilience of the indigenous chickens in the tropical environments: Improvement and future perspectives. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 51: 456-469.
Tadelle, D., C. Kijora and K.J. Peters, 2003. Indigenous chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia: Growth and feed utilization potentials. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 144-152.
Google LLC, n.d. Google Earth Engine. Mountain View, California, United States.
[Direct Link]
Vougat, R.R.B.N., S. Chouto, S.A. Doua, R. Garabed, A.Z. Pagnah and B. Gonne, 2019. Using Google Earth™ and geographical information system data as method to delineate sample domains for an urban household surveys: The case of Maroua (Far north region-Cameroon). Int. J. Health Geographics, Vol. 18. 10.1186/s12942-019-0186-8
Mahoro, J., T.K. Muasya, F. Mbuza, R. Habimana and A.K. Kahi, 2017. Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Rwanda. Poult. Sci., 96: 4245-4252.
Wang, L.C., Z.T. Ruan, Z.W. Wu, Q.L. Yu, F. Chen and Z.G. Liu et al, 2021. Geometrical characteristics of eggs from 3 poultry species. Poult. Sci., Vol. 100. 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.062
IBM, 2021. Downloading IBM SPSS Statistics 27. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA.
[Direct Link]
DATAtab,, 2025. DATAtab: Online Statistics Calculator. Web application for online statistical calculations, DATAtab e.U., Graz, Austria.
[Direct Link]
Inc, S.I, 2022. JMP® Pro (Version 17). JMP Statistical Discovery LLC. Cary, North Carolina, USA.
[Direct Link]
Ahmed, and Al-Barzinji, 2020. Comparative study of hatchability and fertility rate among local quails. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci., 51: 744-751.
Damte, Z., N. Yemane, H. Hassan and A. Tonamo, 2024. Performance and egg quality traits of local chickens across different agroecologies in the Kewot district, North Shewa zone, Northern Ethiopia. Vet. Anim. Sci., Vol. 24. 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100358
Wijedasa, W.M.R.M., Y.H.S.T. Wickramasinghe, J.K. Vidanarachchi and S.M.C. Himali, 2020. Comparison of egg quality characteristics of different poultry species. J. Agric. Sci., 12: 331-342.
Kapella, L.E., S.S. Nyanda and C.P. Mahonge, 2023. The influence of trait preferences and breeding practices on local chicken genetic resource conservation in Igunga district, Tanzania. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci., 5: 51-60.
Chen, Y., J. Yu and S. Khan, 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ. Modelling Software, 25: 1582-1591.
Yussif, I., D.R. Kugonza, M.W. Okot, P.O. Amuge, R. Costa and F.D. Anjos, 2023. Uganda chicken genetic resources: I. phenotypic and production characteristics. Front. Genet., Vol. 13. 10.3389/fgene.2022.1033031
Shanku, E. and E. Amanuel, 2023. Assesment of production and management system of village chicken reared under farmers condation in Angecha and Damboya districts of Kembata Tembaro zone, southern Ethiopia. Cross Curr. Int. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 5: 62-74.
Cao, C. and X. Liang, 2021. Sensitivity of fit measures to lack of measurement invariance in exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct. Equation Model.: A Multidiscip. J., 29: 248-258.
Tunsisa, L.Y. and K.B. Reda, 2022. Evaluation of fertility, hatchability and egg quality of indigenous chickens in different agro-ecologies of the Sidama region, Ethiopia. Vet. Integr. Sci., 21: 201-219.
Tizazu, N., 2017. On-farm phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken and their husbandry and breeding practices in Debark and Dabat districts, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Master's Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya.
Zalal, F.B., P.K. Sarkar, M. Sultana, M.H. Kawsar and S.K. Fouzder, 2022. Natural incubation and broody hen management practices in Barishal district, Bangladesh. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 11: 189-195.
Habte, M., N. Ameha and S. Demeke, 2013. Production performance of local and exotic breeds of chicken at rural household level in Nole Kabba Woreda, Western Wollega, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8: 1014-1021.
Alemu, S. and S. Terfa, 2024. A review on the effects of broodiness characteristics on egg productivity, hatchability, and chick quality of indigenous chicken in Ethiopia. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat., 10: 131-138.
Eltayeb, N.M., C.E. Wani and I.A. Yousif, 2009. Assessment of broodiness and its influence on production performance and plasma prolactin level in native chicken of the Sudan. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 4: 1-6.
Teshome, F., 2018. Indigenous chicken farmers’ traits preferences, breeding objectives and marketing systems in Seka Chekorsa and Kersa Districts of Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Master's Thesis. Jimma University.
Adan, Y.O, 2024. Phenotypic characterization and identification of farmers breeding objective traits of indigenous chicken ecotypes around Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Master's Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya.
Hirbaye, N., S. Kumar, B. Tesema and D. Dadacha, 2024. Phenotypic characterization and husbandry practice of indigenous chicken ecotypes at west Guji, Ethiopia. Uttar Pradesh J. Zool., 45: 137-151.
Birara, D., E. Bayou, T. Getachew and D. Genzebu, 2022. Performance of indigenous chicken, farmers breed and trait preference in Enarj Enawga and Enemay district, east Gojjam zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. Ecol. Evol. Biol., 7: 59-70.
Fekede, G. and Y. Tadesse, 2021. Breeding practices and preferred traits of indigenous chicken in western Oromia region, Ethiopia. J. Livest. Sci., 12: 85-94.
Fitsum, M., 2017. Production objectives, breeding practices and selection criteria of indigenous chicken in central zone of Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Acad. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Res., 5: 521-528.
Aklilu, H.A., C.J.M. Almekinders, H.M.J. Udo and A.J.V.D. Zijpp, 2007. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 165-177.
Dahloum, L., N. Moula, M. Halbouche and S. Mignon-Grasteau, 2016. Phenotypic characterization of the indigenous chickens (Gallus gallus) in the Northwest of Algeria. Arch. Anim. Breed., 59: 79-90.
Egahi, J.O., N.I. Dim, O.M. Momoh and D.S. Gwaza, 2010. Variations in qualitative traits in the Nigerian local chicken. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 978-979.
Eiki, N., 2016. Determination of phenotypic characteristics, production systems, productivity, and contribution of local chickens to households in North-Central Namibia. Master's Thesis. University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Chebo, C., S. Betsha, A. Sisay and A. Melesse, 2024. Current prospects of husbandry and breeding practices of chicken populations rearing in rural communities: For sustainable improvement interventions. Adv. Agric., Vol. 2024. 10.1155/2024/1331983
FAO, 2023. Methods for estimation of within-population genetic variation. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
[Direct Link]
Vucetich, J.A., T.A. Waite and L. Nunney, 1997. Fluctuating population size and the ratio of effective to census population size. Evolution, 51: 2017-2021.
Nadachowska‐Brzyska, K., M. Konczal and W. Babik, 2021. Navigating the temporal continuum of effective population size. Methods Ecol. Evol., 13: 22-41.
Tadele, A., A. Melesse and M. Taye, 2019. Production systems, productive performances, constraints and rate of inbreeding of indigenous chicken populations in Kaffa zone, South Western Ethiopia. J. Biol., Agric. Healthcare, 9: 54-63.
Okeno, T.O., A.K. Kahi and K.J. Peters, 2011. Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 44: 601-608.
Husmaini, H., R.A. Putra, I. Juliyarsi, T. Edwin, L. Suhartati and H. Harmaini et al, 2021. Population structure of kokok balenggek chicken in in-situ area as indigenous chicken of Indonesia. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 10: 955-1188.
Assefa, H., A. Melesse and M. Taye, 2019. Characterization of indigenous chicken production systems in Sheka zone, south western Ethiopia. Int. J. Res. Agric. Food Sci., 5: 1-16.
Garoma, A, 2023. Constraint and opportunity of village chicken production in Ethiopia. Austin J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., Vol. 10. 10.26420/austinjvetscianimhusb.2023.1112
Tamasgen, N., S. Oli and G. Gobena, 2025. Productivity of indigenous and exotic chicken, analysis of pooled feed ingredients and egg quality under semi-scavenging in Jardaga Jarte district, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Poult. Sci. Manage., Vol. 2. 10.1186/s44364-025-00005-2
Muluneh, B., M. Taye, T. Dessie, D.S. Wondim, D. Kebede and A. Tenagne, 2024. Selection criteria and husbandry practices of indigenous chicken producers in Northwest Ethiopia. Heliyon, Vol. 10. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36094
Jiang, R.S., X.Y. Chen and Z.Y. Geng, 2010. Broodiness, egg production, and correlations between broody traits in an indigenous chicken breed. Poult. Sci., 89: 1094-1096.
Sarkar, P.K., 2022. Broodiness and broody hen management during egg incubation. Rev. Agric. Sci., 10: 337-343.
Ngogo, G.E., F.S. Guni and A.S. Nguluma, 2023. Management systems and productivity of indigenous chickens in Busokelo district, Mbeya region, Tanzania. Eur. J. Agric. Food Sci., 5: 73-79.
Dassidi, N., M. Tellah, A.R. Koblah, N.-A. Djasrabaye and Y.M. Logtene, 2023. Zootechnical and morphological characteristics of indigenous chicken populations of Koundoul areas. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 22: 183-191.
Dassidi, N., M. Tellah, I. Adoum, A. Borso, O. Onagbessan and Y. Logtene et al, 2022. Morphological and zootechnical characterization of the local chicken in the urban area of Abéché. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 22: 5-11.
Claire, D.H., R.K. Donald, K. Aline, M. Tiba, S. Fabrice and H. Richard et al, 2019. Phenotypes, production systems and reproductive performance of indigenous chickens in contemporary Rwanda. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 10: 213-231.
Matawork, M., M. Meseret and T. Samuel, 2019. Productive and reproductive performance of indigenous chickens in Gena Bossa district of Dawro zone, Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 10: 24-32.
Zindove, T.J., A.G. Bakare and P.A. Iji, 2022. Indigenous chicken production in Fiji Islands: Knowledge, constraints and opportunities. Anim. Biosci., 35: 778-788.
Ayalew, H., D. Chanie, T. Fentahun, A. Yinnesu, Y. Dagnew and D. Moges, 2023. Agro ecological base differences of village based local chicken performance and household product consumption in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric., Vol. 9. 10.1080/23311932.2022.2164662
Mekonnen, K.T., D.-H. Lee, Y.-G. Cho and K.-S. Seo, 2023. A review on production, reproduction, morphometric, and morphological characteristics of Ethiopian native chickens. J. World's Poult. Res., 13: 280-291.
Alders, R.G. and R.A.E. Pym, 2009. Village poultry: Still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World's Poult. Sci. J., 65: 181-190.
Boujenane, I, 2023. Characterization of the phenotypic, morphometric and productivity traits of indigenous chickens in the moroccan region of drâa-tafilalet. Anim. Res. Vet. Sci., 7: 1-7.
Vieira, C.S., L.Z. Oliveira, P.F.D.S. Braga and J.T. Carreira, 2025. Light and environment: Regulation of seasonal reproduction in wild birds. Wild, Vol. 2. 10.3390/wild2040048
FAO, 2012. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 11. Rome.
[Direct Link]
Rachman, M.P., O. Bamidele, T. Dessie, J. Smith, O. Hanotte and A.A. Gheyas, 2024. Genomic analysis of Nigerian indigenous chickens reveals their genetic diversity and adaptation to heat-stress. Sci. Rep., Vol. 14. 10.1038/s41598-024-52569-4
Janvier, M, 2017. Characterisation of production systems and development of breeding objectives for indigenous chicken in Rwanda. Master's Thesis. Egerton University.
Yihun, A., M.A. Kirmani and M. Molla, 2020. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken ecotypes in Awi zone, Ethiopia. Ecol. Evol. ary Biol., 5: 131-139.
Bekele, B., A. Melesse, W. Esatu and T. Dessie, 2021. Production performance and egg quality evaluation of indigenous chickens across different agro-ecologies of southern Ethiopia. Vet. Integr. Sci., 20: 133-145.
Gakige, J.K., A.M. King’ori, B.O. Bebe and A.K. Kahi, 2016. Performance of scavenging ecotypes of indigenous chickens on targeted phase supplementary feeding. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 28.
Chaiseha, Y. and M.E.E. Halawani, 2015. Brooding. In: Sturkie's Avian Physiology, Scanes, C.G, (Ed.). Elsevier, London, UK and Waltham, MA, USA, pp: 717-738.
Islam, M.A., S.M. Bulbul, G. Seeland and A.B.M.M. Islam, 2001. Egg quality of different chicken genotypes in summer and winter. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. s, 4: 1411-1414.
Saili, T., L.O. Nafiu, A. Bain, N.S. Asminaya, R. Badaruddin and Y. Lestari, 2024. Quality characteristics of eggs-derived superior native chicken in Kendari city. In: Technological Innovations in Tropical Livestock Development for Environmental Sustainability and Food Security, Isnaeni, P.D., M.S. Maidin, M.A. Pagala, W. Kurniawan and A.B. Kimestri, (Eds.). CRC Press, London, pp: 54-60.
Keambou, T.C., B. Boukila, G. Moussonda and Y. Manjeli, 2009. Comparaison de la qualité des oeufs et des performances de croissance des poussins locaux des zones urbaines et rurales de l’ouest-Cameroun. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., Vol. 3. 10.4314/ijbcs.v3i3.45334
Hantanirina, H.I., R.N. Rabearimisa, N.A.R.R. Andrianantenaina and J.N. Rakotozandriny, 2019. Indigenous race of hen: Egg physical characteristics and laying performance - case of a family poultry farm in Madagascar. Poult. Sci. J., 7: 171-181.
Korato, M., T. Abebe and B. Tolasa, 2021. Review on productive and reproductive performance of different genetic group of chicken in Ethiopia. Am. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 9: 147-150.
Wambui, C.C., E.K. Njoroge and C.B. Wasike, 2018. Characterisation of physical egg qualities in indigenous chicken under free range system of production in Western Kenya. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 30.
Liswaniso, S., N. Qin, X. Shan, I.M. Chimbaka, X. Sun and R. Xu, 2020. Quality characteristics, phenotypic correlations and principal component analysis of indigenous free range chicken eggs in Lusaka, Zambia. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res., 6: 29-35.
Kostaman, T., Y.A. Tribudi, N. Azizah, D.A. Kusumaningrum, U. Adiati and E. Sopian et al, 2024. The comparative egg physical characteristics from four poultry species. 3rd International Conference on Animal Production for Food Sustainability 2023, Sep 07, 2023, IOP Publishing, Bali, Indonesia.
Ademola, A.A., T.R. Fayeye, A.O. Akintunde and V.O. Chimezie, 2023. Egg production and egg quality characteristics of yoruba, sussex, and goliath chickens and their crossbred progenies under humid tropical climate. Ovozoa: J. Anim. Reprod., 12: 1-10.
Azharul, I.M., H. Ranvig and M.A.R. Howlider, 2005. Incubating capacity of broody hens and chick performance in Bangladesh. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 17.
Missohou, A., A. Dieng, P. Horst, V.A. Zarate, T. Nesseim and K. Tchedre, 2003. Effect of dwarf (dw) and frizzle (F) genes on the performance of layers under Senegalese conditions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 35: 373-380.
Soojeede, M.I.A.-, 2022. Common Somali indigenous chicken breeds, in Mogadishu, Somalia. Integr. J. Res. Arts Hum., 2: 38-44.
Miyumo, S.A., C.B. Wasike, E.D. Ilatsia, J. Bennewitz and M.G.G. Chagunda, 2023. Genetic and phenotypic correlations among feed efficiency, immune and production traits in indigenous chicken of Kenya. Front. Genet., Vol. 13. 10.3389/fgene.2022.1070304
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hortuma A. Habteslasie, Kiplangat Ngeno, Tobias O. Okeno, Tadelle Dessie, Alexander Kahi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.