Research Article
Open Access
Comparative Effects of Spray-Dried Plasma and Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate on Intestinal Development in Broiler Chicks
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Spray-dried plasma (SDP) is a bioactive feed additive that frequently improves broiler growth performance and may therefore replace antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs). To improve our understanding of SDP mechanisms of action, a 2-week experiment was conducted to compare the potency of porcine SDP and bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) antibiotic to stimulate intestinal development in neonate chicks. Materials and Methods: Day-old (288) Ross 708 broiler male chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery and randomly assigned to 6 treatments in a completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of chicks given unmedicated corn-soybean meal basal diet containing no BMD or SDP (CX), at 0.055 g kg–1 diet (MX), SDP at 10 g kg–1 diet (SP1), SDP at 20 g kg–1 diet (SP2), SDP at 30 g kg–1 diet (SP3) and SDP at 40 g kg–1 diet (SP4). On day 3, 7 and 14 of experiment, intestinal maltase activity was determined. Villi morphometrics was also measured in the jejunum (d 7). Results: On day 7, all chicks that consumed SDP and BMD had lower villus: crypt ratio (p = 0.0006) and higher goblet cell density (p < 0.0001) compared to CX. Furthermore, on day 14, ileal maltase activity was higher for all chicks that consumed SDP (3.036-3.065 μg glucose/min/mL/μg protein, p < 0.0001) compared to CX (3.025 μg glucose/min/mL/μg protein). Conclusion: Like BMD antibiotic, dietary SDP at 30 or 40 g kg–1 diet improves feed conversion ratio in chicks in-part, by increasing ileal maltase activity, reducing intestinal villus/crypt ratio (indicative of ongoing villi renewal/regeneration) and increasing goblet cell density.
Keywords:
Bacitracin methylene disalicylate, broiler chicks, goblet cell density, intestinal development, maltase activity, spray-dried plasma, villi morphometryArticle Metrics
164
Abstract Views
173
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Jababu, Y., Blue, C., Ferket, P., & Fasina , Y. (2020). Comparative Effects of Spray-Dried Plasma and Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate on Intestinal Development in Broiler Chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 19(4), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.161.168
References
1.
Konarzewski, M., C. Lilja, J. Kozłowski and B. Lewonńczuk, 1990. On the optimal growth of the alimentary tract in avian postembryonic development. J. Zool., 222: 89-101.
2.
Uni, Z., 1999. Functional development of the small intestine in domestic birds: Cellular and molecular aspects. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev., 10: 167-179.
3.
Schokker, D., A.J.W. Hoekman, M.A. Smits and J.M.J. Rebel, 2009. Gene expression patterns associated with chicken jejunal development. Dev. Comp. Immunol., 33: 1156-1164.
4.
Cheled-Shoval, S.L., E. Amit-Romach, M. Barbakov and Z. Uni, 2011. The effect of in ovo administration of mannan oligosaccharide on small intestine development during the pre- and posthatch periods in chickens. Poult. Sci., 90: 2301-2310.
5.
Filho, A.L.D.B.M., C.J.B. Oliveira, O.C.F. Neto, C.M.C.G.d. Leon and M.M.S. Saraiva et al., 2018. Intra-amnionic threonine administered to chicken embryos reduces Salmonella enteritidis cecal counts and improves posthatch intestinal development. J. Immunol. Res., Vol. 2018.
6.
Lilburn, M.S., 1998. Practical aspects of early nutrition for poultry. J. Applied Poult. Res., 7: 420-424.
7.
Woanski, N.J., R.A. Renema, F.E. Robinson, V.L. Carney and B.I. Fancher, 2006. Relationship between chick conformation and quality measures with early growth traits in males of eight selected pure or commercial broiler breeder strains. Poult. Sci., 85: 1490-1497.
8.
Leeson, S., 2016. Spray-dried plasma assessed for antibiotic-free chicks. Poult. Ind. Tech. Art.
9.
Uni, Z., S. Ganot and D. Sklan, 1998. Posthatch development of mucosal function in the broiler small intestine. Poult. Sci., 77: 75-82.
10.
Clavijo, V. and M.J.V. Flórez, 2018. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: A review. Poult. Sci., 97: 1006-1021.
11.
Smirnov, A., E. Tako, P.R. Ferket and Z. Uni, 2006. Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poult. Sci., 85: 669-673.
12.
Rubio, L.A., 2019. Possibilities of early life programming in broiler chickens via intestinal microbiota modulation. Poult. Sci., 98: 695-706.
13.
Broom, L.J., 2017. The sub-inhibitory theory for antibiotic growth promoters. Poult. Sci., 96: 3104-3108.
14.
Marshall, B.M. and S.B. Levy, 2011. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 24: 718-733.
15.
Lin, J., A.A. Hunkapiller, A.C. Layton, Y.J. Chang and K.R. Robbins, 2013. Response of intestinal microbiota to antibiotic growth promoters in chickens. Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 10: 331-337.
16.
Karp, B.E., H. Tate, J.R. Plumblee, U. Dessai and J.M. Whichard et al., 2017. National antimicrobial resistance monitoring system: Two decades of advancing public health through integrated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 14: 545-557.
17.
Food and Drug Administration, 2015. Summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. https://www.fda.gov/media/102160/download.
18.
Gaskins, H.R., C.T. Collier and D.B. Anderson, 2002. Antibiotics as growth promotants: Mode of action. Anim. Biotechnol., 13: 29-42.
19.
Huyghebaert, G., R. Ducatelle and F. van Immerseel, 2011. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet. J., 187: 182-188.
20.
Browna, K., R.R.E. Uwierab, M.L. Kalmokoff, S.P.J. Brooksd and G.D. Inglisa, 2017. Antimicrobial growth promoter use in livestock: a requirement to understand their modes of action to develop effective alternatives. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 49: 12-24.
21.
Borg, B.S., J.M. Campbel, J. Polo, L.E. Russell, C. Rodriguez and J. Ródenas, 2002. Evaluation of the chemical and biological characteristics of spray-dried plasma protein collected from various locations around the world. Am. Assoc. Swine Vet., 33: 97-100.
22.
Peace, R.M., J. Campbell, J. Polo, J. Crenshaw, L. Russell and A. Moeser, 2011. Spray-dried porcine plasma influences intestinal barrier function, inflammation and diarrhea in weaned pigs. J. Nutr., 141: 1312-1317.
23.
Beski, S.S.M., R.A. Swick and P.A. Iji, 2015. Specialized protein products in broiler chicken nutrition: A review. Anim. Nutr., 1: 47-53.
24.
Van Dijk, A.J., R.J.C.F. Margry, A.G. van der Lee, G. Hemke and A.C. Beynen, 2002. Growth performance and health status in weanling piglets fed spray‐dried porcine plasma under typical Northern European conditions. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 86: 17-25.
25.
Young, L.S. and Y.O. Fasina, 2018. Potential of spray dried animal plasma as an alternative in-feed growth promoter in poultry production. Approaches Poult. Dairy Vet. Sci., 5: 437-441.
26.
Campbell, J.M., J.D. Crenshaw, R. González-Esquerra and J. Polo, 2019. Impact of spray-dried plasma on intestinal health and broiler performance. Microorganisms, Vol. 7, No. 8.
27.
Beski, S.S.M., R.A. Swick and P.A. Iji, 2015. Subsequent growth performance and digestive physiology of broilers fed on starter diets containing spray-dried porcine plasma as a substitute for meat meal. Br. Poult. Sci., 56: 559-568.
28.
Aviagen, 2015. Ross broiler pocket guide: Housing and environment. http://en.aviagen.com/.
29.
NRC., 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780309048927, Pages: 176.
30.
Dahlqvist, A., 1964. Method for assay of intestinal disaccharidases. Anal. Biochem., 7: 18-25.
31.
Black, B.L., M. Niedzlek-Feaver and M.J. Wingate, 2010. Enzyme exercises designed for both laboratory and internet environments. Tested Stud. Lab. Teach., 31: 363-373.
32.
SAS., 2004. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Proprietary software version 9.00. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
33.
Sims, M.D., K.A. Dawson, K.E. Newman, P. Spring and D.M. Hoogell, 2004. Effects of dietary mannan oligosaccharide, bacitracin methylene disalicylate, or both on the live performance and intestinal microbiology of turkeys. Poult. Sci., 83: 1148-1154.
34.
Jamroz, D., A. Wiliczkiewicz, J. Orda, J. Skorupinska, M. Slupczynska and J. Kuryszko, 2011. Chemical composition and biological value of spray dried porcine blood by-products and bone protein hydrolysate for young chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 52: 589-605.
35.
Jeurissen, S.H.M., F. Lewis, J.D. van der Klis, Z. Mroz, J.M.J. Rebel and A.A.H.M. ter Huurne, 2002. Parameters and techniques to determine intestinal health of poultry as constituted by immunity, integrity and functionality. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol., 3: 1-14.
36.
Chotinsky, D., E. Toncheva and Y. Profirov, 2001. Development of disaccharidase activity in the small intestine of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 42: 389-393.
37.
Siddons, R.C., 1969. Intestinal disaccharidase activities in the chick. Biochem. J., 112: 51-59.
38.
Shibata, M., T. Takahashi, T. Kozakai, M. Kakudo, S. Kasuga, Y. Azuma and Y. Kurose, 2019. Active transport of glucose across the jejunal epithelium decreases with age in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 98: 2570-2576.
39.
Awad, W., K. Ghareeb and J. Bohm, 2008. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supplemented with a Synbiotic containing Enterococcus faecium and Oligosaccharides. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 9: 2205-2216.
40.
McGuckin, M.A., S.K. Lindén, P. Sutton and T.H. Florin, 2011. Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9: 265-278.
41.
He, J., H. Guo, W. Zheng and W. Yao, 2019. Effects of stress on the mucus-microbial interactions in the gut. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 20: 155-163.
