Research Article
Open Access
Salmonella Colonization of Production Hens Fed a Parietal Yeast Fraction with High Levels of Mannan and Beta-Glucan
Abstract
Background and Objective: Salmonella is a gram-negative rod-shaped pathogen responsible for approximately 1 million foodborne illnesses per year in the U.S. Previous studies with highly concentrated levels of mannans (>20%) in yeast cell wall have shown to reduce Salmonella counts in broiler ceca when added to feed. This study was conducted to understand the effects of concentrated mannans on Salmonella in egg producing hens. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 Hy-Line W36 layers were challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, 12 birds fed basal diet only (Control) and 12 birds fed the basal diet plus treatment of 500 ppm cell wall. At one-week post challenge, all birds were humanely euthanized and cecal prevalence and enumeration were recorded. Results: Cecal counts on birds challenged with S. Typhimurium showed a final count of 4.71 log10 CFU mL–1, while yeast cell wall sample counts were 3.71 log10 CFU mL–1 (p = 0.015). Conclusion: A 1 log reduction of cecal Salmonella is a biologically important result indicating there may be some potential for this yeast cell wall to impact levels of Salmonella Typhimurium in the ceca.
Keywords:
<i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium, foodborne illness, laying hens, parietal yeast fraction, yeast cell wallGeographical Article View
Article Metrics
121
Abstract Views
106
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Price , P., Gaydos, T., Padgett, J., Gardner, K., & Bailey, C. (2019). Salmonella Colonization of Production Hens Fed a Parietal Yeast Fraction with High Levels of Mannan and Beta-Glucan. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18(9), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.410.415
References
1.
WHO., 2018. World Health Statistics 2018: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN-13: 9789241565585, Pages: 103.
2.
CDC., 2013. An atlas of Salmonella in the United States, 1968-2011: Laboratory-based enteric disease surveillance. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA., USA.
3.
Hulaj, B., P. Cabeli, I. Goga, N. Taylor, C. Hess and M.L. Hess, 2016. Survey of the prevalence of Salmonella species on laying hen farms in Kosovo. Poult. Sci., 95: 2030-2037.
4.
Poppe, C., R.J. Irwin, S. Messier, G.G. Finley and J. Oggel, 1991. The prevalence of Salmonella enteritidis and other Salmonella spp. among Canadian registered commercial chicken broiler flocks. Epidemiol. Infect., 107: 201-211.
5.
FSIS., 2019. Pathogen reduction-Salmonella and Campylobacter performance standards verification testing. United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Maryland, USA., February 25, 2019.
6.
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards, 2011. Scientific opinion on a quantitative estimation of the public health impact of setting a new target for the reduction of Salmonella in broilers. EFSA J., Vol. 9, No. 7.
7.
UEP., 2019. Facts and stats. United Egg Producers (UEP), Johns Creek, GA., USA. https://unitedegg.com/facts-stats/.
8.
Guan, J., C. Grenier and B.W. Brooks, 2006. In vitro study of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium definitive type 104: Survival in egg albumen and penetration through the vitelline membrane. Poult. Sci., 85: 1678-1681.
9.
Humphrey, T.J., A. Baskerville, S. Mawer, B. Rowe and S. Hopper, 1989. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: A study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol. Infect., 103: 415-423.
10.
Poppe, C., 1999. Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. In: Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis in Humans and Animals: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Control, Saeed, A.M., R.K. Gast, M.E. Potter and P.G. Wall (Eds.). Blackwell, Ames, IA., USA., ISBN: 0813827078, pp: 3-18.
11.
USDA., 2014. Layers 2013, part II: Control and prevention of Salmonella enteritidis on table-egg farms in the United States, 2013. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Animal Health Monitoring System, Fort Collins, CO., USA., August 2014.
12.
CDC., 2017. Foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet): FoodNet 2015 surveillance report (final data). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA., USA.
13.
Gale, S.F., 2006. Radlo foods hatches a high-tech egg safety plan. https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/december-2005january-2006/radlo-foods-hatches-a-high-tech-egg-safety-plan/.
14.
Shivaprasad, H.L., J.F. Timoney, S. Morales, B. Lucio and R.C. Baker, 1990. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in laying chickens. I. Studies on egg transmission, clinical signs, fecal shedding and serologic responses. Avian Dis., 34: 548-557.
15.
Food and Drug Administration, 2009. Prevention of Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs during production, storage and transportation. Federal Register, 74: 33030-33101.
16.
Groves, P.J., S.M. Sharpe, W.I. Muir, A. Pavic and J.M. Cox, 2016. Live and inactivated vaccine regimens against caecal Salmonella Typhimurium colonisation in laying hens. Aust. Vet. J., 94: 387-393.
17.
Kilroy, S., R. Raspoet, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle and F. van Immerseel, 2016. Prevention of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis after oral vaccination of laying hens with Salmonella Enteritidis ΔtolC and ΔacrABacrEFmdtABC mutants. Vet. Res., Vol. 47.
18.
Swiatkiewicz, S., A. Arczewska-Wlosek and D. Jozefiak, 2014. Immunomodulatory efficacy of yeast cell products in poultry: A current review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 70: 57-68.
19.
Roto, S.M., P.M. Rubinelli and S.C. Ricke, 2015. An introduction to the avian gut microbiota and the effects of yeast-based prebiotic-type compounds as potential feed additives. Front. Vet. Sci., Vol. 2.
20.
Chen, C.Y., S.W. Chen and H.T. Wang, 2017. Effect of supplementation of yeast with bacteriocin and Lactobacillus culture on growth performance, cecal fermentation, microbiota composition and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 30: 211-220.
21.
Muthusamy, N., S. Haldar, T.K. Ghosh and M.R. Bedford, 2011. Effects of hydrolysed Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and yeast cell wall components on live performance, intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune response of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci., 52: 694-703.
22.
Perez-Sotelo, L.S., M. Talavera-Rojas, H.G. Monroy-Salazar, S. Lagunas-Bernabe, J.A. Cuaron-Ibarguengoytia, R.M. de Oca Jimenez and J.C. Vazquez-Chagoyan, 2005. In vitro evaluation of the binding capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sc47 to adhere to the wall of Salmonella spp. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol., 47: 70-75.
23.
Tiago, F.C.P., F.S. Martins, E.L.S. Souza, P.F.P. Pimenta and H.R.C. Araujo et al., 2012. Adhesion to the yeast cell surface as a mechanism for trapping pathogenic bacteria by Saccharomyces probiotics. J. Med. Microbiol., 61: 1194-1207.
24.
Ganner, A. and G. Schatzmayr, 2012. Capability of yeast derivatives to adhere enteropathogenic bacteria and to modulate cells of the innate immune system. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 95: 289-297.
25.
Kiros, T.G., T. Gaydos, J. Corley, R. Raspoet, R. Berghaus and C. Hofacre, 2018. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast products in reducing direct colonization and horizontal transmission of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers. J. Applied Poult. Res., 28: 23-30.
26.
Line, E.J., S.J. Bailey, N.A. Cox, N.J. Stern and T. Tompkins, 1998. Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poult. Sci., 77: 405-410.
27.
Hy-Line International, 2016. Hy-Line W-36 commercial layers: Management guide. Hy-Line International, West Des Moines, IA., USA., January 2016. https://www.hyline.com/UserDocs/Pages/36_COM_ENG.pdf.
28.
Wales, A.D. and R.H. Davies, 2011. A critical review of Salmonella Typhimurium infection in laying hens. Avian Pathol., 40: 429-436.
29.
Posadas, G.A., P.R. Broadway, J.A. Thornton, J.A. Carroll and A. Lawrence et al., 2017. Yeast pro- and paraprobiotics have the capability to bind pathogenic bacteria associated with animal disease. Transl. Anim. Sci., 1: 60-68.
