Research Article Open Access

Identifying Intra-Specific Variability in the Virulence of Eimeria tenella Using SCAR Markers

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mahmoud E. Sedeik
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
|
Nahed A. El-Shall
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
|
Ashraf M. Awad
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
|
Hatem S. Abd-Elhamid
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
|
Hany F. Ellakany
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
|
Abeer F. El-nahas
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
|
Wael K. Elfeil
Department of Avian and Rabbit Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismaïlia, Egypt
Published on: March 15, 2019
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2019.151.158
PDF

Abstract

Background and Objective: Coccidia are major parasitic pathogens of poultry, with infection characterized by intestinal lesions, blood loss, body weight loss, a poor feed conversion ratio, increased susceptibility to other microorganisms and mortality. The present study was undertaken to identify intra-specific variability in the virulence of Eimeria tenella strains using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers. Materials and Methods: A single PCR-based assay was performed to detect and identify E. tenella using SCAR markers for four strains that represent four Egyptian governorates (Alexandria, Beheira, Gharbia and Kafr El-Sheikh). The Coccivac B<*sup>® vaccine was used as a source of E. tenella (wild type). Results: Sequencing and a phylogenetic tree of all E. tenella strains showed 100% identity, except for the Gharbia governorate strain, which exhibited 97.86% identity with the other governorate strains. However, these results did not correlate with an evaluation of strain virulence using 25×10<*sup>3 oocysts per chick, as the Alexandria strain was found to be the most virulent (60% mortality and a significant reduction in weight gain). The Beheira strain was the second most virulent strain (33.33% mortality), followed by the Gharbia and Kafr El-Sheikh strains (no mortality). Conclusion: These results indicate that the nucleotide variations identified between the Gharbia strain and other strains may occur infrequently or that the portion of the genome under study is not involved in the pathogenicity of E. tenella. Furthermore, the SCAR markers used in this study may be species specific (E. tenella) and may not reveal intra-specific variations.

Keywords:

<i>Eimeria tenella</i>, Coccidia, Egypt, pathogenicity, poultry, SCAR markers

Article Metrics

173 Abstract Views
158 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Identifying Intra-Specific Variability in the Virulence of Eimeria tenella Using SCAR Markers on PlumX

How to Cite

Sedeik , M. E., El-Shall, N. A., Awad, A. M., Abd-Elhamid, H. S., Ellakany, H. F., El-nahas, A. F., & Elfeil, W. K. (2019). Identifying Intra-Specific Variability in the Virulence of Eimeria tenella Using SCAR Markers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18(4), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.151.158
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Vermeulen, A.N., 2004. Avian Coccidiosis: A Disturbed Host-Parasite Relationship to be Restored. In: Host-Parasite Interactions, Flik, G. and G. Wiegertjes (Eds.). Taylor and Francis Inc., USA., ISBN: 9781135319786, pp: 211-241.
2.
Blake, D.P. and F.M. Tomley, 2014. Securing poultry production from the ever-present Eimeria challenge. Trends Parasitol., 30: 12-19.
3.
Calnek, B.W., H.J. Barnes, C.W. Beard, L.R. McDougald and Y.M. Saif, 1997. Diseases of Poultry. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA., USA., Pages: 1080.
4.
Yadav, A. and S.K. Gupta, 2001. Study of resistance against some ionophores in Eimeria tenella field isolates. Vet. Parasitol., 102: 69-75.
5.
Long, P.L., B.J. Millard, L.P. Joyner and C.C. Norton, 1976. A guide to laboratory techniques used in the study and diagnosis of avian coccidiosis. Folia Vet. Lat., 6: 201-217.
6.
Tsuji, N., M. Ohta, S.I. Kawazu, T. Kamio, T. Isobe, K. Shimura and K. Fujisaki, 1999. DNA polymorphism of srRNA gene among Eimeria tenella strains isolated in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 61: 1331-1333.
7.
Molloy, J.B., F.W. Eaves, P.J. Jeston, C.M. Minchin, N.P. Stewart, A.E. Lew and W.K. Jorgensen, 1998. Detection of Eimeria acervulina using the polymerase chain reaction. Avian Dis., 42: 119-123.
8.
Su, Y.C., A.C.Y. Fei and F.M. Tsai, 2003. Differential diagnosis of five avian Eimeria species by polymerase chain reaction using primers derived from the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) sequence. Vet. Parasitol., 117: 221-227.
9.
Lien, Y.Y., S.C. Sheu, H.J. Liu, S.C. Chen and M.Y. Tsai et al., 2007. Cloning and nucleotide sequencing of the second internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA for three species of Eimeria from chickens in Taiwan. Vet. J., 173: 184-189.
10.
Amiruddin, N., X.W. Lee, D.P. Blake, Y. Suzuki and Y.L. Tay et al., 2012. Characterisation of full-length cDNA sequences provides insights into the Eimeria tenella transcriptome. BMC Genomics, Vol. 13.
11.
Min, W.G., R.A. Dalloul and H.S. Lillehoj, 2004. Application of biotechnological tools for coccidia vaccine development. J. Vet. Sci., 5: 279-288.
12.
Barta, J.R., B.A. Coles, M.L. Schito, M.A. Fernando, A. Martin and H.D. Danforth, 1998. Analysis of infraspecific variation among five strains of Eimeria maxima from North America. Int. J. Parasitol., 28: 485-492.
13.
Kawazoe, U., E.L. Bordin, C.A. de Lima and L.A.V. Dias, 2005. Characterisation and histopathological observations of a selected Brazilian precocious line of Eimeria acervulina. Vet. Parasitol., 131: 5-14.
14.
Blake, D.P., P. Hesketh, A. Archer, M.W. Shirley and A.L. Smith, 2006. Eimeria maxima: The influence of host genotype on parasite reproduction as revealed by quantitative real-time PCR. Int. J. Parasitol., 36: 97-105.
15.
Costa, C.A., R.F. Gomes, M.N. Melo and M.F. Ribeiro, 2001. Eimeria parasites of domestic fowl: Genetic relationships of different isolates estimated from random amplified polymorphic DNA. Parasitol. Res., 87: 459-466.
16.
Shirley, M.W., 2000. The genome of Eimeria spp., with special reference to Eimeria tenella-a coccidium from the chicken. Int. J. Parasitol., 30: 485-493.
17.
Morris, G.M. and R.B. Gasser, 2006. Biotechnological advances in the diagnosis of avian coccidiosis and the analysis of genetic variation in Eimeria. Biotechnol. Adv., 24: 590-603.
18.
Davies, S.F.M. and L.P. Joyner, 1963. Effects of dietary vitamin K on severity of coccidial infections in fowl. Parasitology, 53: P11-P11.
19.
Hnida, J.A. and D.W. Duszynski, 1999. Taxonomy and systematics of some Eimeria species of murid rodents as determined by the ITS1 region of the ribosomal gene complex. Parasitology, 119: 349-357.
20.
Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritish and T. Maniatis, 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Edn., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0879693091, Pages: 397.
21.
Fernandez, S., A.H. Pagotto, M.M. Furtado, A.M. Katsuyama, A.M. Madeira and A. Gruber, 2003. A multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and discrimination of the seven Eimeria species that infect domestic fowl. Parasitology, 127: 317-325.
22.
Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins and T.J. Gibson, 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 4673-4680.
23.
Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei and S. Kumar, 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol., 28: 2731-2739.
24.
Johnson, J. and W.M. Reid, 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol., 28: 30-36.
25.
Hilbrich, P., 1978. Krankheiten des Gefliigels-unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Haltung und Fiitterung. Hermann Kuhn GMBH & Co., Villingen, Schwenningen, pp: 15-70.
26.
Nematollahi, A., F. Niyazpour and G. Moghaddam, 2008. Prevalence of Eimeria sp. among broiler chicks in Tabriz (Northwest of Iran). Res. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 72-74.
27.
SAS., 2004. SAS/GRAPH 9.1 Reference. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
28.
Cantacessi, C., S. Riddell, G.M. Morris, T. Doran, W.G. Woods, D. Otranto and R.B. Gasser, 2008. Genetic characterization of three unique operational taxonomic units of Eimeria from chickens in Australia based on nuclear spacer ribosomal DNA. Vet. Parasitol., 152: 226-234.
29.
Schwarz, R.S., M.C. Jenkins, S. Klopp and K.B. Miska, 2009. Genomic analysis of Eimeria spp. populations in relation to performance levels of broiler chicken farms in Arkansas and North Carolina. J. Parasitol., 95: 871-880.
30.
Brisse, S., J.C. Dujardin and M. Tibayrenc, 2000. Identification of six Trypanosoma cruzi lineages by sequence-characterised amplified region markers. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 111: 95-105.
31.
Shirley, M.W. and N. Bumstead, 1994. Intra-specific variation within Eimeria tenella detected by the random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Parasitol. Res., 80: 346-351.
32.
Procunier, J.D., M.A. Fernando and J.R. Barta, 1993. Species and strain differentiation of Eimeria spp. of the domestic fowl using DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers. Parasitol. Res., 79: 98-102.
33.
El-Nahas, A.F., A.M. Awad and S.S. Abu-Akkada, 2011. Genetic variation among five Egyptian field isolates of Eimeria tenella detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA assay. Glob Vet., 7: 256-263.
34.
Awad, A.M., A.F. El-Nahas and S.S. Abu-Akkada, 2013. Evaluation of the protective efficacy of the anticoccidial vaccine Coccivac-B in broilers, when challenged with Egyptian field isolates of E. tenella. Parasitol. Res., 112: 113-121.
35.
Conway, D.P., M.E. Mckenzie and A. Dayton, 1990. Relationship of coccidial lesion scores and weight gain in infections of Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella in broilers. Avian Pathol., 19: 489-496.
36.
Shumard, R.F. and M.E. Callender, 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: Screening methods. Exp. Parasitol., 28: 13-24.
37.
Abu-Akkada, S.S. and A.M. Awad, 2012. Isolation, propagation, identification and comparative pathogenicity of five Egyptian field strains of Eimeria tenella from broiler chickens in five different provinces in Egypt. Res. Vet. Sci., 92: 92-95.
38.
Tipu, M.A., T.N. Pasha and Z. Ali, 2002. Comparative efficacy of salinomycin sodium and neem fruit (Azadirachta Indica) as feed additive anticoccidials in broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 1: 91-93.
39.
Long, P.L., J. Johnson and R.D. Wyatt, 1980. Eimeria tenella: Clinical effects in partially immune and susceptible chickens. Poult. Sci., 59: 2221-2224.
40.
Williams, R.B., 2006. Relative virulences of a drug-resistant and a drug-sensitive strain of Eimeria acervulina, a coccidium of chickens. Vet. Parasitol., 135: 15-23.
41.
Warren, E.W., 1968. Vitamin requirements of the Coccidia of the chicken. Parasitology, 58: 137-148.