Research Article Open Access

Effect of Mixing ACIDAL® with Drinking Water for Laying Hens on Production Performance

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
T. Bouassi
Centre d`Excellence Regional sur les Sciences Aviaires (CERSA), Universite de Lome, B.P. 1515, Lome, Togo
|
Y. Ameyapoh
Centre d`Excellence Regional sur les Sciences Aviaires (CERSA), Universite de Lome, B.P. 1515, Lome, Togo
|
V. Van Hamme
Impextraco, Wiekevorstsesteenweg 38, 2220 Heist-Op-Den-Berg, Belgium
|
K. Anani
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Controle de Qualite des Denrees Alimentaires (LAMICODA), Ecole Superieure des Techniques Biologiques et Alimentaires, Universite de Lome, Togo
|
Y. Adjrah
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Controle de Qualite des Denrees Alimentaires (LAMICODA), Ecole Superieure des Techniques Biologiques et Alimentaires, Universite de Lome, Togo
|
E. Decuypere
Laboratory for Physiology, Immunology and Genetics of Domestic Animals, Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium
|
M. Gbeassor
Centre d`Excellence Regional sur les Sciences Aviaires (CERSA), Universite de Lome, B.P. 1515, Lome, Togo
|
K. Tona
Centre d`Excellence Regional sur les Sciences Aviaires (CERSA), Universite de Lome, B.P. 1515, Lome, Togo
Published on: August 15, 2016
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2016.365.372
PDF

Abstract

Background: The ban of antibiotics use as growth factors since 2006 affects animal performance and economical viability of farms. Several alternatives including incorporation of organic acids in feed or drinking water in order to improve productivity were studied. Objective: The objective of this study is to mix ACIDAL with drinking water of hens in order to improve productivity. Methodology: The experiment was carried out with 360 ISA Brown hens (22-44 weeks of age), allocated to 3 groups (control, Aci 1 and Aci 2) of 120 birds each. The three groups received, respectively in drinking water 0, 1 and 2 mL of ACIDAL L–1. Prior to start, every 4 weeks and at the end of the treatments, samples of chicken droppings according to each group were collected and used to determine total Streptococcus and Escherichia coli and to check the presence of Salmonella. During treatments, amount of water consumption, feed intake, body weight, egg weight and egg component weights were recorded weekly. Results: Eggs produced were collected daily and every 2 weeks, the litter quality was assessed. Mixing of ACIDAL with drinking water of laying hens reduced significantly the number of total bacteria, eliminated completely Salmonella in the droppings, decreased feed intake and improved egg weights and body weight compared to control group witch litter was significantly wetter and more tendentiously crusty compared to those of treated groups. Conclusion: In opposite, there is no effect on water consumption, mortality rate, egg laying rate and ratios of albumen, yolk and shell.

Keywords:

ACIDAL ML, alternatives, antibiotics, growth promoters, organic acids

Article Metrics

262 Abstract Views
93 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2016 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Effect of Mixing ACIDAL® with Drinking Water for Laying Hens on Production Performance on PlumX

How to Cite

Bouassi , T., Ameyapoh, Y., Hamme, V. V., Anani, K., Adjrah, Y., Decuypere, E., Gbeassor, M., & Tona, K. (2016). Effect of Mixing ACIDAL® with Drinking Water for Laying Hens on Production Performance. International Journal of Poultry Science, 15(9), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2016.365.372
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Dorman, H.J.D. and S.G. Deans, 2000. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol., 88: 308-316.
2.
Mead, G.C., 2000. Prospects for competitive exclusion treatment to control salmonellas and other foodborne pathogens in poultry. Vet. J., 159: 111-123.
3.
Izat, A.L., N.M. Tidwell, R.A. Thomas, M.A. Reiber, M.H. Adams, M. Colberg and P.W. Waldroup, 1990. Effects of a buffered propionic acid in diets on the performance of broiler chickens and on microflora of the intestine and carcass. Poult. Sci., 69: 818-826.
4.
Thompson, J.L. and M. Hinton, 1997. Antibacterial activity of formic and propionic acids in the diet of hens on Salmonellas in the crop. Br. Poult. Sci., 38: 59-65.
5.
Hassan, H.M.A., M.A. Mohamed, A.W. Youssef and E.R. Hassan, 2010. Effect of using organic acids to substitute antibiotic growth promoters on performance and intestinal microflora of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 1348-1353.
6.
Cengiz, O., B.H. Koksal, O. Tatli, O. Sevim and H. Avci et al., 2012. Influence of dietary organic acid blend supplementation and interaction with delayed feed access after hatch on broiler growth performance and intestinal health. Vet. Med., 57: 515-528.
7.
Brul, S. and P. Coote, 1999. Preservative agents in foods: Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 50: 1-17.
8.
Mroz, Z., 2005. Organic acids as potential alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters for pigs. Adv. Pork Prod., 16: 169-182.
9.
Fuller, R., 1977. The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. Br. Poult. Sci., 18: 85-94.
10.
Akyurek, H., M.L. Ozduven, A.A. Okur, F. Koc and H.E. Samli, 2011. The effects of supplementing an organic acid blend and/or microbial phytase to a corn-soybean based diet fed to broiler chickens. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6: 642-649.
11.
Fuller, R., C.B. Cole and M.E. Coates, 1984. The Role of Streptococcus faecium in Antibiotic-Relieved Growth Depression of Chickens. In: Antimicrobials and Agriculture, Woodbine, M. (Ed.). Butterworths, London, UK., pp: 395-403.
12.
Adil, S., T. Banday, G.A. Bhat, M.S. Mir and M. Rehman, 2010. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, intestinal histomorphology and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken. Vet. Med. Int.
13.
Mohamed, M.A., E.F. El-Daly, N.A. Abd El-Azeem, A.W. Youssef and H.M.A. Hassan, 2014. Growth performance and histological changes in ileum and immune related organs of broilers fed organic acids or antibiotic growth promoter. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 602-610.
14.
Leeson, S., H. Namkung, M. Antongiovanni and E.H. Lee, 2005. Effect of butyric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 84: 1418-1422.
15.
Pelicia, K., A.A. Mendes, E.S.P.B. Saldanha, C.C. Pizzolante and S.E. Takahashi et al., 2004. Probiotic and prebiotic utilization in diets for free-range broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira Ciencia Avicola, 6: 99-104.
16.
Shane, M.S., 2001. Mannan Oligosaccharides in Poultry Nutrition: Mechanism and Benefits. In: Science and Technology in the Feed Industry: Proceedings of Alltech's 17th Annual Symposium, Lyons, T.P. and K.A. Jacques (Eds.). Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK., pp: 65-77.
17.
Wong, H.K. and M.W. Zahari, 2009. The effect of supplementary formic and lactic acid mixtures on egg production, feed conversion ratio and egg quality of layers. J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci., 37: 187-194.
18.
Langhout, P. and T. Sus, 2005. Volatile fatty acids improve performance and quality. Int. Poult. Prod., 13: 17-17.
19.
Vogt, H. and S. Matthes, 1981. The effect of organic-acids on the performances of broilers. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 46: 223-227.
20.
Skinner, J.T., A.L. Izat and P.W. Waldroup, 1991. Research note: Fumaric acid enhances performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 70: 1444-1447.
21.
Rahman, M.S., M.A.R. Howlider, M. Mahiuddin and M.M. Rahman, 2008. Effect of supplementation of organic acids on laying performance, body fatness and egg quality of hens. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 37: 74-81.
22.
Soltan, M.A., 2008. Effect of dietary organic acid supplementation on egg production, egg quality and some blood serum parameters in laying hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 613-621.
23.
Gama, N.M.S.Q., M.B.C. de Oliviera, E. Santin and A. Berchieri Jr., 2000. Supplementation with organics acids in diet of laying hens. Ciencia Rural, 30: 499-502.
24.
Kahn, C.M., 2010. The Merck Veterinary Manual. 10th Edn., Wiley, London, UK., ISBN: 9780911910933, Pages: 2945.
25.
Partanen, K.H. and Z. Mroz, 1999. Organic acids for performance enhancement in pig diets. Nutr. Res. Rev., 12: 117-145.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>