Research Article Open Access

Evaluation of a Modified Manual Restraint Test for Estimating Fearfulness in Laying Hens

Authors

Natsuki Fukano
Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Physiology, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
|
Natsuho Wada
Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Physiology, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
|
Takao Oka
Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Physiology, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
|
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Takashi Bungo
Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Physiology, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
Published on: October 15, 2015
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2015.602.605
PDF

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate effect of a new manual restraint test for the detection of fearfulness on the blood parameters in hens. Each chicken was held in an underarm with mild pressure, whereas the other hand was used to restrain the legs. Thereafter, latencies to the first struggle and frequencies of struggling were recorded for 5 min. At the end of the test, the blood samples were collected. At one week after the test, their bloods were collected again as control. Median of latency (sec.) or frequency (number) of struggling in laying hens was 116.0 and 4.5, respectively. No significant differences were detected in the levels of glucose and FFA by manual restraint while the level of corticosterone just after the test was higher than that at one week after the test. These findings demonstrate that the newly developed restraint test is useful for detecting fearfulness in chickens.

Keywords:

Chicken, corticosterone, fearfulness, restraint, stress

Article Metrics

128 Abstract Views
106 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Evaluation of a Modified Manual Restraint Test for Estimating Fearfulness in Laying Hens on PlumX

How to Cite

Fukano, N., Wada, N., Oka, T., & Bungo , T. (2015). Evaluation of a Modified Manual Restraint Test for Estimating Fearfulness in Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14(11), 602–605. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.602.605
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Barnett, J.L. and P.H. Hemsworth, 1989. Fear of humans by laying hens in different tiers of a battery: Behavioural and physiological responses. Br. Poult. Sci., 30: 497-504.
2.
Bolhuis, J.E., E.D. Ellen, C.G. van Reenen, J. de Groot and J. Ten Napel et al., 2009. Effects of genetic group selection against mortality on behavior and peripheral serotonin in domestic laying hens with trimmed and intact beaks. Physiol. Behav., 97: 470-475.
3.
Bowers, R.R., W.T. Festuccia, C.K. Song, H. Shi, R.H. Migliorini and T.J. Bartness, 2004. Sympathetic innervation of white adipose tissue and its regulation of fat cell number. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 286: R1167-R1175.
4.
Bungo, T., E. Nakasai, M. Takawaki, H. Tanizawa and S.I. Kawakami, 2015. Brain monoamine asymmetry in chicks subjected to a separation-stress procedure with litter substrate. J. Poult. Sci., 52: 37-41.
5.
Charmandari, E., C. Tsigos and G. Chrousos, 2005. Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 67: 259-284.
6.
De Haas, E.N., M.S. Kops, J.E. Bolhuis, T.G.G. Groothuis, E.D. Ellen and T.B. Rodenburg, 2012. The relation between fearfulness in young and stress-response in adult laying hens, on individual and group level. Physiol. Behav., 107: 433-439.
7.
Faure, J.M., R.B. Jones and W. Bessei, 1983. Fear and social motivation as factors in open-field behaviour of the domestic chick. Behav. Biol., 8: 103-116.
8.
Forkman, B., A. Boissy, M.C. Meunier-Salaun, E. Canali and R.B. Jones, 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav., 92: 340-374.
9.
Jones, R.B., 1985. Fear responses of individually-caged laying hens as a function of cage level and aisle. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 14: 63-74.
10.
Jones, R.B., 1996. Fear and adaptability in poultry: Insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poult. Sci. J., 52: 131-174.
11.
Korte, S.M., G. Beuving, W. Ruesing and H.J. Blokhuis, 1997. Plasma catecholamine and corticosterone levels during manual restraint in chicks from a high and low feather pecking line of laying hens. Physiol. Behav., 62: 437-441.
12.
Kregel, K.C., J.M. Overton, D.G. Johnson, C.M. Tipton and D.R. Seals, 1991. Mechanism for pressor response to nonexertional heating in the conscious rat. J. Applied Physiol., 71: 192-196.
13.
Mignon-Grasteau, S., O. Roussot, C. Delaby, J.M. Faure and A. Mills et al., 2003. Factorial correspondence analysis of fear-related behaviour traits in Japanese quail. Behav. Processes, 61: 69-75.
14.
Nakasai, E., H. Tanizawa, M. Takawaki, K. Yanagita and S.I. Kawakami et al., 2013. Age-dependent change of tonic immobility response in chicks of a native Japanese chicken breed, Tosa-Jidori. J. Poult. Sci., 50: 321-325.
15.
Oka, T. and T. Bungo, 2014. Comparison of behavioral responses to manual restraint tests in two breeds of Japanese native chicken. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 545-548.
16.
Ricart-Jane, D., V. Rodriguez-Sureda, A. Benavides, J. Peinado-Onsurbe, M.D. Lopez-Tejero and M. Liobera, 2002. Immobilization stress alters intermediate metabolism and circulating lipoproteins in the rat. Metabolism, 51: 925-931.
17.
SAS., 1998. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
18.
Schutz, K., S. Kerje, O. Carlborg, L. Jacobsson, L. Andersson and P. Jensen, 2002. QTL analysis of a red junglefowl × white leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits. Behav. Genet., 32: 423-433.
19.
Tanizawa, H., J.I. Shiraishi, S.I. Kawakami, M. Tsudzuki and T. Bungo, 2014. Effect of short-term thermal conditioning on physiological and behavioral responses to subsequent acute heat exposure in chicks. J. Poult. Sci., 51: 80-86.
20.
Uitdehaag, K.A., T.B. Rodenburg, Y.M. van Hierden, J.E. Bolhuis, M.J. Toscano, C.J. Nicol and J. Komen, 2008. Effects of mixed housing of birds from two genetic lines of laying hens on open field and manual restraint responses. Behav. Processes, 79: 13-18.
21.
Uitdehaag, K.A., T.B. Rodenburg, C.G. van Reenen, R.E. Koopmanschap and G. De Vries Reilingh et al., 2011. Effects of genetic origin and social environment on behavioral response to manual restraint and monoamine functioning in laying hens. Poult. Sci., 90: 1629-1636.
22.
Yanagita, K., J.I. Shiraishi, S.I. Kawakami and T. Bungo, 2011. Time course changes in the blood parameters and the expression of diencephalic CRH and AVT mRNA due to acute isolation stress in chicks. J. Poult. Sci., 48: 125-129.