Research Article
Open Access
Consumer Segmentation Based on Food-Related Lifestyles and Perception of Chicken Breast
Abstract
The aim of this study was to disseminate knowledge regarding the perceptions of Spanish consumers of chicken breast and their related lifestyles and to classify different consumer groups according to their food-related lifestyles. Nearly all Spanish consumers consume chicken breast once or twice per week. The preference for white or yellow chicken appears to be divided evenly, although the preferred is white chicken. Chicken breast is perceived as a product of convenience. Seventy percent of consumers buy chicken breast because it is easy to cook whereas only 27% prefer to buy the entire chicken. Four groups of consumers based on their lifestyles and their perceptions of chicken breast were identified: "Urban single", "Traditional", "Innovative precariat" and "Gourmet". These types of consumers are consistent with types other studies have identified in terms of the lifestyles associated with other foods. Defining groups of consumers with differentiated perceptions of chicken breast is useful in managing marketing strategies to satisfy the various consumption needs associated with chicken breast.
Keywords:
Convenience, cooking habits, eating situations, psychographic, quality cuesArticle Metrics
256
Abstract Views
147
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Ripoll , G., Alberti, P., & Panea, B. (2015). Consumer Segmentation Based on Food-Related Lifestyles and Perception of Chicken Breast. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14(5), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.262.275
References
1.
Barbut, S., 2001. Acceptance of fresh chicken meat presented under three light sources. Poult. Sci., 80: 101-104.
2.
Acebron, L.B. and D.C. Dopico, 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Qual. Pref., 11: 229-238.
3.
Bernues, A., G. Ripoll and B. Panea, 2012. Consumer segmentation based on convenience orientation and attitudes towards quality attributes of lamb meat. Food Qual. Pref., 26: 211-220.
4.
Bilgili, S.F., 2002. Poultry meat processing and marketing-what does the future hold? Poult. Int., 9: 12-22.
5.
Boedeker, M. and H. Marjanen, 1993. Choice orientation types and their shopping trips: An empirical study of shopping trips to the city centre vs to an edge-of-town retail park. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research in the Distributive Trades, September 6-8, 1993, Institute for Retail Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
6.
Bredahl, L. and K.G. Grunert, 1997. Identificacion de los estilos de vida alimenticios en espana. Investigacion Agraria: Economia, 12: 247-263.
7.
Brunso, K. and K.G. Grunert, 1995. Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: Food-related life style. Adv. Consumer Res., 22: 475-480.
8.
Brunso, K., J. Scholderer and K.G. Grunert, 2004. Testing relationships between values and food-related lifestyle: Results from two european countries. Appetite, 43: 195-205.
9.
Buckley, M., C. Cowan and M. McCarthy, 2007. The convenience food market in great britain: Convenience Food Lifestyle (CFL) segments. Appetite, 49: 600-617.
10.
Campbell, W.W., M.L. Barton Jr., D. Cyr-Campbell, S.L. Davey, J.L. Beard, G. Parise and W.J. Evans, 1999. Effects of an omnivorous diet compared with a lactoovovegetarian diet on resistance-training-induced changes in body composition and skeletal muscle in older men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 70: 1032-1039.
11.
Canavari, M., G. Nocella and R. Scarpa, 2005. Stated willingness-to-pay for organic fruit and pesticide ban: An evaluation using both web-based and face-to-face interviewing. J. Food Prod. Market., 11: 107-134.
12.
Chetthamrongchai, P. and G. Davies, 2000. Segmenting the market for food shoppers using attitudes to shopping and to time. Br. Food J., 102: 81-101.
13.
De Boer, M., M. McCarthy, C. Cowan and I. Ryan, 2004. The influence of lifestyle characteristics and beliefs about convenience food on the demand for convenience foods in the irish market. Food Qual. Prefer., 15: 155-165.
14.
Devkota, N., K.P. Paudel, J.M. Fannin, L.M. Hall and R.H. Caffey, 2007. Calibrating online survey sample for economic impact analysis. Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
15.
Fischer, C., 2006. The complexities of modern food consumption and implications for international food product marketers. J. Int. Food Agribus. Market., 19: 7-35.
16.
Fleming, C.M. and M. Bowden, 2009. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. J. Environ. Manag., 90: 284-292.
17.
Fletcher, D.L., 1999. Broiler breast meat color variation, pH and texture. Poult. Sci., 78: 1323-1327.
18.
Forestell, C.A., A.M. Spaeth and S.A. Kane, 2012. To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females. Appetite, 58: 319-325.
19.
Garitta, L., G. Hough and E. Hulshof, 2008. Determining optimum ripening time of fruits by applying survival analysis statistics to consumer data. Food Qual. Pref., 19: 747-752.
20.
Good, L.K. and P. Huddleston, 1995. Ethnocentrism of Polish and Russian consumers: Are feelings and intentions related. Int. Market. Rev., 12: 35-48.
21.
Grunert, K.G., 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Sci., 74: 149-160.
22.
Grunert, K.G., H.H. Larsen, T.K. Madsen and A. Baadsgaard, 1996. Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture. Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN-13: 978-1-4613-1301-4.
23.
Grunert, K.G., K. Brunso, L. Bredahl and A.C. Bech, 2001. Food-Related Lifestyle: A Segmentation Approach to European Food Consumers. In: Food, People and Society: A European Perspective of Consumers' Food Choices, Frewer, L.J., E. Risvik and H. Schifferstein (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN-13: 978-3-662-04601-2, pp: 211-230.
24.
Grunert, K.G., T. Perrea, Y. Zhou, G. Huang, B.T. Sorensen and A. Krystallis, 2011. Is Food-Related Lifestyle (FRL) able to reveal food consumption patterns in non-western cultural environments? Its adaptation and application in Urban China. Appetite, 56: 357-367.
25.
Gimeno, J.M.H., 2002. Quality of foods of animal origin: What is the meaning for the Spanish consumer of 21th century? Eurocarne, 106: 33-34.
26.
Hoek, A.C., P.A. Luning, A. Stafleu and C. de Graaf, 2004. Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes and meat consumers. Appetite, 42: 265-272.
27.
Hoogland, C.T., J. de Boer and J.J. Boersema, 2007. Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards? Appetite, 49: 47-57.
28.
Hough, G. and M. Sosa, 2015. Food choice in low income populations-a review. Food Qual. Prefer., 40: 334-342.
29.
Hunter, W. and T. Worsely, 2009. Understanding the older food consumer. Present day behaviours and future expectations. Appetite, 52: 147-154.
30.
Jaeger, S.R. and H.L. Meiselman, 2004. Perceptions of meal convenience: The case of at-home evening meals. Appetite, 42: 317-325.
31.
Kennedy, O.B., B.J. Stewart-Knox, P.C. Mitchell and D.I. Thurnham, 2004. Consumer perceptions of poultry meat: A qualitative analysis. Nutr. Food Sci., 34: 122-129.
32.
Kennedy, O.B., B.J. Stewart-Knox, P.C. Mitchell and D.I. Thurnham, 2005. Flesh colour dominates consumer preference for chicken. Appetite, 44: 181-186.
33.
Kiefner-Burmeister, A.E., D.A. Hoffmann, M.R. Meers, A.M. Koball and D.R. Musher-Eizenman, 2014. Food consumption by young children: A function of parental feeding goals and practices. Appetite, 74: 6-11.
34.
Kubberod, E., O. Ueland, M. Rodbotten, F. Westad and E. Risvik, 2002. Gender specific preferences and attitudes towards meat. Food Qual. Preference, 13: 285-294.
35.
Kubberod, E., O. Ueland, A. Tronstad and E. Risvik, 2002. Attitudes towards meat and meat-eating among adolescents in Norway: A qualitative study. Appetite, 38: 53-62.
36.
Kuttappan, V.A., Y.S. Lee, G.F. Erf, J.F. Meullenet, S.R. McKee and C.M. Owens, 2012. Consumer acceptance of visual appearance of broiler breast meat with varying degrees of white striping. Poult. Sci., 91: 1240-1247.
37.
Larsson, C.L., K.S. Klock, A.N. Astrom, O. Haugejorden and G. Johansson, 2002. Lifestyle-related characteristics of young low-meat consumers and omnivores in sweden and norway. J. Adolescent Health, 31: 190-198.
38.
Osornio, M.M.L., G. Hough, A. Salvador, E. Chambers IV, S. McGraw and S. Fiszman, 2008. Beef's optimum internal cooking temperature as seen by consumers from different countries using survival analysis statistics. Food Qual. Prefer., 19: 12-20.
39.
Mata, J., B. Scheibehenne and P.M. Todd, 2008. Predicting children's meal preferences: How much do parents know? Appetite, 50: 367-375.
40.
Mesias, F.J., P. Gaspar, A.F. Pulido, M. Escribano and F. Pulido, 2009. Consumers' preferences for iberian dry-cured ham and the influence of mast feeding: An application of conjoint analysis in Spain. Meat Sci., 83: 684-690.
41.
Nayga, Jr. R.M., 1996. Determinants of consumers' use of nutritional information on food packages. J. Agric. Applied Econ., 28: 303-312.
42.
Nayga, Jr. R.M., 2000. Nutrition knowledge, gender and food label use. J. Consum. Affairs, 34: 97-112.
43.
NCC., 2012. Consumers speak about chicken breast meat/breast tenders. Survey Results 2012, National Chicken Council (NCC), Stowe, Vermont, USA.
44.
Nielsen, J.S., 2011. Use of the internet for willingness-to-pay surveys: A comparison of face-to-face and web-based interviews. Resour. Energy Econ., 33: 119-129.
45.
Qiao, G., T. Guo and K.K. Klein, 2012. Melamine and other food safety and health scares in china: Comparing households with and without young children. Food Control, 26: 378-386.
46.
Dellepiane, R.R., 1997. Evolucion y caracteristicas de la alimentacion fuera del hogar y del consumo de alimentos procesados en Espana. Agricultura Sociedad, 84: 107-140.
47.
Saba, A., F. Messina, A. Turrini, M. Lumbers, M.M. Raats and The Food in Later Life Project Team, 2008. Older people and convenience in meal preparation: A European study on understanding their perception towards vegetable soup preparation. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 32: 147-156.
48.
SAS., 1994. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.04. 4th Edn., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
49.
Scholderer, J., K. Brunso, L. Bredahl and K.G. Grunert, 2004. Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe. Appetite, 42: 197-211.
50.
Sharma, S., T.A. Shimp and J. Shin, 1995. Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. J. Acad. Market. Sci., 23: 26-37.
51.
Steptoe, A., T.M. Pollard and J. Wardle, 1995. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25: 267-284.
52.
Sunde, M.L., 1992. The scientific way to pigment poultry products. Introduction to the symposium. Poult. Sci., 71: 709-710.
53.
Troy, D.J. and J.P. Kerry, 2010. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci., 86: 214-226.
54.
Twigg, J., 1979. Food for thought: Purity and vegetarianism. Religion, 9: 13-35.
55.
Twigg, J., 1983. Vegetarianism and the Meanings of Meat. In: The Sociology of Food and Eating: Essays on the Sociological Significance of Food, Murcott, A. (Ed.). Gower Publishing, Aldershot, UK., ISBN-13: 9780566005800, pp: 18-30.
56.
Verbeke, W., F.J.A. Perez-Cueto, M.D. de Barcellos, A. Krystallis and K.G. Grunert, 2010. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Sci., 84: 284-292.
57.
Von Alvensleben, R., 1997. Consumer Behaviour. In: Agro-Food Marketing, Padberg, D.I., C. Ritson and L. Albisu (Eds.). CAB International, Oxon, UK., ISBN-13: 9780851991436, pp: 209-224.
58.
Worsley, A. and G. Skrzypiec, 1998. Teenage vegetarianism: Prevalence, social and cognitive contexts. Appetite, 30: 151-170.
59.
Wu, L., 2007. How generations view convenience. Food Technol., 12: 32-37.
