Research Article Open Access

Use of Prebiotic Supplementation to Diet for Reducing the Negative Effects of Delayed Feed Access on Growth Rate in Broiler Chickens

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
B.H. Koksal
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disease, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
O. Cengiz
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disease, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
O. Sevim
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disease, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
O. Tatli
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disease, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
A.G. Uner
Department of Physiology, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
D. Beyaz
Department of Food Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
S. Buyukyoruk
Department of Food Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
|
A.G. Onol
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disease, Veterinary Faculty, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
Published on: November 15, 2013
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2013.714.720
PDF

Abstract

About 36 h delays in access to feed and water after hatch is a common practice for broiler chicken production in Turkey. In the current study it was aimed to investigate the compensatory affect of dietary prebiotic inclusion on growth rate and gut health in birds delayed to feed and water access after hatch. The study was a factorial arrangement in a complete randomized design and continued for 42 days. One hundred ninety six, one day old male broilers (Ross 308) with an initial weight of 48.39±0.06 g/birds assigned to 4 treatments in a 2 (times of initiation of feeding) ×2 (prebiotic supplemental levels) factorial arrangement with 4 replications, each having 12 birds. Results indicated that delay in feed access had negative effects on body weight, body weight gain and feed intake while dietary prebiotic inclusion improved growth rate and feed conversion ratio in birds. However, almost all other examine parameters, including gut histomorphology and microbiology, showed no significant variances between treatments. As a conclusion, expect feed conversion ratio values, dietary prebiotic inclusion had no beneficial effect on growth rate and gut health in broiler chickens exposed to post hatch holding time.

Keywords:

Growth rate, gut health, holding time, prebiotic

Article Metrics

111 Abstract Views
82 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Use of Prebiotic Supplementation to Diet for Reducing the Negative Effects of Delayed Feed Access on Growth Rate in Broiler Chickens on PlumX

How to Cite

Koksal , B., Cengiz, O., Sevim, O., Tatli, O., Uner, A., Beyaz, D., Buyukyoruk, S., & Onol, A. (2013). Use of Prebiotic Supplementation to Diet for Reducing the Negative Effects of Delayed Feed Access on Growth Rate in Broiler Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(12), 714–720. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.714.720
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Alhota, R.A., 2011. Effects of early feed restriction during delayed placement on the performance and gut health of broilers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA.
2.
Bigot, K., S. Mignon-Grasteau, M. Picard and S. Tesseraud, 2003. Effects of delayed feed intake on body, intestine and muscle development in neonate broilers. Poult. Sci., 82: 781-788.
3.
Corless, A.B. and J.L. Sell, 1999. The effects of delayed access to feed and water on the physical and functional development of the digestive system of young Turkeys. Poult. Sci., 78: 1158-1169.
4.
Culling, C.F.A., R.T. Allison and W.T. Barr, 1985. Cellular Pathology Technique. 4th Edn., Butterworth and Co. Publishers Ltd., London, UK., ISBN-10: 0-407-72903-8, pp: 431-499.
5.
Dibner, J., 1999. Feeding hatchling poultry: Avoid any delay. Feed International, pp: 30-34.
6.
Dibner, J.J., C.D. Knight, M.L. Kitchell, C.A. Atwell, A.C. Downs and F.J. Ivey, 1998. Early feeding and development of the immune system in neonatal poultry. J. Applied Poult. Res., 7: 425-436.
7.
Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
8.
Geyra, A., Z. Uni and D. Sklan, 2001. The effect of fasting at different ages on growth and tissue dynamics in the small intestine of the young chick. Br. J. Nutr., 86: 53-61.
9.
Gonzales, E., N. Kondo, E.S. Saldanha, M.M. Loddy, C. Careghi and E. Decuypere, 2003. Performance and physiological parameters of broiler chickens subjected to fasting on the neonatal period. Poult. Sci., 82: 1250-1256.
10.
Hartemink, R. and F.M. Rombouts, 1999. Comparison of media for the detection of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli and total anaerobes from faecal samples. J. Microbiol. Meth., 36: 181-192.
11.
Kim, G.B., Y.M. Seo, C.H. Kim and I.K. Paik, 2011. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora and immune response of broilers. Poult Sci., 90: 75-82.
12.
Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 2001. Nutrition of the Chicken. 4th Edn., Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford, ISBN: 9780969560043, Pages: 591.
13.
Moore, D., P. Ferket and P. Mozdziak, 2005. Early post-hatch fasting induces satellite cell self-renewal. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A: Mol. Integrat. Physiol., 142: 331-339.
14.
Nir, I., Z. Nitsan and M. Mahagna, 1993. Comparative growth and development of the digestive organs and of some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. Br. Poult. Sci., 34: 523-532.
15.
Nitsan, Z., G. Ben-Avraham, Z. Zoref and I. Nir, 1991. Growth and development of the digestive organs and some enzymes in broiler chicks after hatching. Br. Poult. Sci., 32: 515-523.
16.
Noy, Y. and D. Sklan, 1999. Different types of early feeding and performance in chicks and poults. J. Applied Poult. Res., 8: 16-24.
17.
Noy, Y., A. Geyra and D. Sklan, 2001. The effect of early feeding on growth and small intestinal development in the posthatch poult. Poult. Sci., 80: 912-919.
18.
Noy, Y. and Z. Uni, 2010. Early nutritional strategies. World Poult. Sci. J., 66: 639-646.
19.
Pinchasov, Y. and Y. Noy, 1993. Comparison of post-hatch holding time and subsequent early performance of broiler chicks and turkey poults. Br. Poult. Sci., 34: 111-120.
20.
Rebole, A., L.T. Ortiz, M.L. Rodriguez, C. Alzueta, J. Trevino and S. Velasco, 2010. Effects of inulin and enzyme complex, individually or in combination, on growth performance, intestinal microflora, cecal fermentation characteristics and jejunal histomorphology in broiler chickens fed a wheat- and barley-based diet. Poult. Sci., 89: 276-286.
21.
SAS, 2001. SAS/STAT Users Guide for Personal Computers Release. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
22.
Saki, S.A., 2005. Effect of post-hatch feeding on broiler performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 4-6.
23.
Sayrafi, R., F. Soltanalinejad, R. Shahrooz and S. Rahimi, 2011. Comparative study of the effect of alternative and antibiotic feed additives on the performance and intestinal histomorphometrical parameters of broiler chickens. Afr. J. Agri. Res., 6: 2794-2799.
24.
Tona, K., F. Bamelis, B.D. Ketelaere, V. Bruggeman and V.M.B. Moraes et al., 2003. Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality and chick juvenile growth. Poult. Sci., 82: 736-741.
25.
Uni, Z., A. Smirnov and D. Sklan, 2003. Pre- and posthatch development of goblet cells in the broiler small intestine: Effect of delayed access to feed. Poult. Sci., 82: 320-327.
26.
Vieira, S.L., O.A. Oyarzabal, D.M. Freitas, J. Berres, J.E.M. Pena, C.A. Torres and J.L.B. Coneglian, 2008. Performance of broilers fed diets supplemented with sanguinarine-like alkaloids and organic acids. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 17: 128-133.
27.
Waldroup, A.L., J. Skinner, R. Hierholzer and P.W. Waldroup, 1993. An evaluation of fructooligo saccharide in diets for broiler chickens and effects on Salmonellae contamination of carcasses. Poult. Sci., 72: 643-650.
28.
Williams, J., S. Mallet, M. Leconte, M. Lessire and I. Gabriel, 2008. The effects of fructo-oligosaccharides or whole wheat on the performance and digestive tract of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 49: 329-339.
29.
Yegani, M. and D.R. Korver, 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult. Sci., 87: 2052-2063.