Research Article
Open Access
Continuing Multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis Strains in Egg Yolk During Refrigeration at 7.2oC
Abstract
The continuing attribution of human illness caused by Salmonella enteritidis to the consumption of contaminated eggs has led to widespread implementation of risk reduction programs for commercial egg production, often emphasizing prompt refrigeration of eggs to prevent bacterial multiplication to dangerously high levels. However, microbial growth may not cease immediately inside warm eggs after transfer to refrigerated storage. The present study compared the abilities of 8 S. enteritidis strains (of 4 phage types) to continue multiplying in experimentally contaminated egg yolk during the first 24 h after transition from warm to refrigeration temperatures. After 15 mL samples of egg yolk were inoculated with 10 CFU/ml of S. enteritidis, they were incubated at 37°C for 16 h and then transferred into refrigeration at 7.2°C for 24 h. Bacterial cell concentrations were determined following 37°C incubation and again after both 8 and 24 h at 7.2°C. All 8 S. enteritidis isolates multiplied significantly during 16 h of incubation, reaching an overall mean of log10 8.790 CFU/ml. After refrigeration, the observed mean values for cell concentrations in yolk samples were log10 8.780 CFU/mL at 8 h and log10 8.849 CFU/mL at 24 h. For 3 of 8 strains, a significant (p<0.05) increase in cell concentrations in egg yolk occurred during 24 h of refrigeration. These results support the importance of prompt egg refrigeration for minimizing the numbers of S. enteritidis in marketed table eggs, although refrigeration at 7.2oC may not immediately or completely arrest multiplication by all strains.
Keywords:
Egg yolk, refrigeration, multiplication, Salmonella enteritidis, temperatureArticle Metrics
146
Abstract Views
129
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Gast , R. K., & Guraya, R. (2013). Continuing Multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis Strains in Egg Yolk During Refrigeration at 7.2oC. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(11), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.622.627
References
1.
Braden, C.R., 2006. Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: A national epidemic in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis., 43: 512-517.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. Vital signs: Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food-foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. sites, 1996-2010. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep., 60: 749-755.
3.
Chai, S.J., P.L. White, S.L. Lathrop, S.M. Solghan and C. Medus et al., 2012. Salmonella enteric serotype Enteritidis: Increasing incidence of domestically acquired infections. Clin. Infect. Dis., 54: S488-S497.
4.
Chen, H., R.C. Anantheswaran and S.J. Knabel, 2002. Effect of rapid cooling on the growth and penetration of Salmonella enteritidis into egg contents. J. Food Safety, 22: 255-271.
5.
Chen, J. and H.S. Thesmar, 2008. Populations of Salmonella enteritidis in artificially inoculated chicken eggs as influenced by the temperatures under which eggs might be held from the day of lay until the day of processing. J. Food Prot., 71: 2073-2077.
6.
Cogan, T.A., F. Jorgensen, M.H. Lappin-Scott, C.E. Benson, M.J. Woodward and T.J. Humphrey, 2004. Flagella and curli fimbriae are important for the growth of Salmonella enterica serovars hen eggs. Microbiol. J., 150: 1063-1071.
7.
Coward, C., L. Sait, T. Cogan, T.J. Humphrey and D.J. Maskell, 2013. O-antigen repeat number in Salmonella enteric serovar Enteritidis is important for egg contamination, colonization of the chicken reproductive tract and survival in egg albumen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 343: 169-176.
8.
De Vylder, R. Raspoet, J. Dewulf, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle and F. Van Immerseel, 2012. Salmonella enteritidis is superior in egg white survival compared with other Salmonella serotypes. Poult. Sci., 92: 842-845.
9.
DeWinter, L.M., W.H. Ross, H. Couture and J.F. Farber, 2011. Risk assessment of shell eggs internally contaminated with Salmonella enteritidis. Food Risk Anal. J., 1: 40-81.
10.
Ebel, E. and W. Schlosser, 2000. Estimating the annual fraction of eggs contaminated with Salmonella enteritidis in the United States. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 61: 51-62.
11.
Esaki, H., K. Shimura, Y. Yamazaki, M. Eguchi and M. Nakamura, 2013. National surveillance of Salmonella enteritidis in commercial eggs in Japan. Epidemiol. Infect., 141: 941-943.
12.
Gantois, I., V. Eeckhaut, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle and F. Van Immerseel, 2008. A comparative study on the pathogenesis of egg contamination by different serotypes of Salmonella. Avian Pathol., 37: 399-406.
13.
Gast, R.K., 2007. Serotype-specific and serotype-independent strategies for preharvest control of food-borne Salmonella in poultry. Avian Dis., 51: 817-828.
14.
Gast, R.K. and C.W. Beard, 1992. Detection and enumeration of Salmonella enteritidis in fresh and stored eggs laid by experimentally infected hens. J. Food. Protect., 55: 152-156.
15.
Gast, R.K., J. Guard-Bouldin and P.S. Holt, 2004. Colonization of reproductive organs and internal contamination of eggs after experimental infection of laying hens with Salmonella heidelberg and Salmonella enteritidis. Avian Dis., 48: 863-869.
16.
Gast, R.K., J. Guard-Petter and P.S. Holt, 2003. Effect of prior serial in vivo passage on the frequency of Salmonella enteritidis contamination in eggs from experimentally infected laying hens. Avian Dis., 47: 633-639.
17.
Gast, R.K., R. Guraya and J. Guard, 2013. Salmonella enteritidis deposition in eggs after experimental infection of laying hens with different oral doses. J. Food Prot., 76: 108-113.
18.
Gast, R.K., R. Guraya, J. Guard and P.S. Holt, 2010. Multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis in egg yolks after inoculation outside, on and inside vitelline membranes and storage at different temperatures. J. Food. Protect., 73: 1902-1906.
19.
Gast, R.K., R. Guraya, J. Guard-Bouldin and P.S. Holt, 2007. In vitro penetration of egg yolks by Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella heidelberg strains during thirty-six-hour ambient temperature storage. Poult. Sci., 86: 1431-1435.
20.
Gast, R.K., R. Guraya, J. Guard-Bouldin and P.S. Holt, 2008. Multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis on the yolk membrane and penetration to the yolk contents at 30°C in an in vitro egg contamination model. J. Food Prot., 71: 1905-1909.
21.
Gast, R.K., R. Guraya, J. Guard-Bouldin, P.S. Holt and R.W. Moore, 2007. Colonization of specific regions of the reproductive tract and deposition at different locations inside eggs by hens infected with Salmonella enteritidis or Salmonella heidelberg. Avian Dis., 51: 40-44.
22.
Gast, R.K. and P.S. Holt, 2000. Deposition of phage type 4 and 13a Salmonella enteritidis strains in the yolk and albumen of eggs laid by experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis., 44: 706-710.
23.
Gast, R.K. and P.S. Holt, 2000. Influence of the level and location of contamination on the multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis at different storage temperatures in experimentally inoculated eggs. Poult. Sci., 79: 559-563.
24.
Gast, R.K. and P.S. Holt, 2001. Assessing the frequency and consequences of Salmonella enteritidis deposition on the egg yolk membrane. Poult. Sci., 80: 997-1002.
25.
Gast, R.K. and P.S. Holt, 2001. Multiplication in egg yolk and survival in egg albumen of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis strains of phage types 4, 8, 13a and 14b. J. Food Prot., 64: 865-868.
26.
Gast, R.K., P.S. Holt and R. Guraya, 2006. Effect of refrigeration on in vitro penetration of Salmonella enteritidis through the egg yolk membrane. J. Food Prot., 69: 1426-1429.
27.
Gast, R.K., P.S. Holt and T. Murase, 2005. Penetration of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella heidelberg into egg yolks in an in vitro contamination model. Poult. Sci., 84: 621-625.
28.
Gast, R.K., D.R. Jones, K.E. Anderson, R. Guraya, J. Guard and P.S. Holt, 2010. In vitro penetration of Salmonella enteritidis through yolk membranes of eggs from 6 genetically distinct commercial lines of laying hens. Poult. Sci., 89: 1732-1736.
29.
Greig, J.D. and A. Ravel, 2009. Analysis of foodborne outbreak data reported internationally for source attribution. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 130: 77-87.
30.
Guard-Bouldin, J., R.K. Gast, T.J. Humphrey, D.J. Henzler, C. Morales and K. Coles, 2004. Subpopulation characteristics of egg-contaminating Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis as defined by the lipopolysaccharide O chain. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 70: 2756-2763.
31.
Gurtler, J.B. and D.E. Conner, 2009. Survival and growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid egg products varying by temperature, product composition and carbon dioxide concentration. Foodborne Pathogens Dis., 6: 561-567.
32.
Havelaar, A.H., S. Ivarsson, M. Lofdahl and M.J. Nauta, 2013. Estimating the true incidence of campylobacteriosis and Salmonellosis in the European Union, 2009. Epidemiol. Infect., 141: 293-302.
33.
Humphrey, T.J. and A. Whitehead, 1993. Egg age and the growth of Salmonella enteritidis in egg contents. Epidemiol. Infect., 111: 209-219.
34.
Humphrey, T.J., A. Whitehead, A.H.L. Gawler, A. Henley and B. Rowe, 1991. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens eggs. Epidemiol. Infect., 106: 489-496.
35.
Kang, H., C. Loui, R.I. Clavijo, L.W. Riley and S. Lu, 2006. Survival characteristics of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken egg albumen. Epidemiol. Infect., 134: 967-976.
36.
Latimer, H.K., H.M. Marks, M.E. Coleman, W.D. Schlosser and N.J. Golden et al., 2008. Evaluating the effectiveness of pasteurization for reducing human illnesses from Salmonella sp. in egg products: Results of a quantitative risk assessment. Foodborne Pathogens Dis., 5: 59-68.
37.
Mumma, G.A., P.M. Griffin, M.I. Meltzer, C.R. Braden and R.V. Tauxe, 2004. Egg quality assurance programs and egg-associated Salmonella enteritidis infections, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 10: 1782-1789.
38.
O'Brien, S.J., 2013. The decline and fall of nontyphoidal Salmonella in the United Kingdom. Clin. Infect. Dis., 56: 705-710.
39.
Okamura, M., S. Kikuchi, A. Suzuki, H. Tachizaki, K. Takehara and M. Nakamura, 2008. Effect of fixed or changing temperatures during prolonged storage on the growth of Salmonella enteric serovar Enteritidis inoculated artificially into shell eggs. Epidemiol. Infect., 136: 1210-1216.
40.
Poirier, E., L. Watier, E. Espie, F.X. Weill, H. De Valk and J.C. Desenclos, 2008. Evaluation of the impact on human salmonellosis of control measures targeted to Salmonella enteritidis and Typhimurium in poultry breeding using time-series analysis and intervention models in France. Epidemiol. Infect., 136: 1217-1224.
41.
Schoeni, J.L., K.A. Glass, J.L. McDermott and A.C.L. Wong, 1995. Growth and penetration of Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella heidelberg and Salmonella typhimurium in eggs. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 24: 385-396.
42.
Schroeder, C.M., H.K. Latimer, W.D. Schlosser, N.J. Golden and H.M. Marks et al., 2006. Overview and summary of the food safety and inspection service risk assessment for Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs, October 2005. Foodborne Pathogens Dis., 3: 403-412.
43.
Shah, D.H., C. Casavant, Q. Hawley, T. Addwebi, D.R. Call and J. Guard, 2012. Salmonella enteritidis strains from poultry exhibit differential responses to acid stress, oxidative stress and survival in the egg albumen. Foodborne Pathogens Dis., 9: 258-264.
44.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2009. Prevention of Salmonella enteritidis in shell eggs during production, storage and transportation: Final rule. Fed. Reg., 74: 33039-33101.
45.
Waltman, W.D. and R.K. Gast, 2008. Salmonellosis. In: A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens, Dufour-Zavala, L., D.E. Swayne, J.R. Glisson, J.E. Pearson, W.M. Reed, M.W. Jackwood and P.R. Woolcock (Eds.). 5th Edn., American Association of Avian Pathologists, Athens, GA., USA., pp: 3-9.
