Research Article Open Access

Comparison of Quality Parameters in Hen’s Eggs According to Egg Shell Color

Authors

M.A. Soria
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Concepcion del Uruguay, Casilla de Correo N 6, 3260, Entre Ríos, Argentina
|
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
D.J. Bueno
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Concepcion del Uruguay, Casilla de Correo N 6, 3260, Entre Ríos, Argentina
|
I.I.C. Bernigaud
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay, Casilla de Correo N°6, 3260, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Published on: March 15, 2013
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2013.224.234
PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate some quality parameters of commercial hen’s eggs according to egg shell color. A total of 5,424 eggs were purchased from 113 supermarkets situated in 14 cities from the east-center of Entre Rios, Argentina; 3,475 were white eggshell and 1,949 eggs were brown eggshell. The values of Egg Weight (EW), Eggshell Weight (ESW), Eggshell Thickness (EST), % eggshell (% ES) and Total Shell Surface Area (TSSA) were greater in brown eggs than in white eggs. There was a significant positive correlation between EW and ESW and EW and TSSA, but EW had negative correlations with % ES. There were no significant differences in yolk (Y) and albumen (Al) pH between brown eggs and white eggs. The range of Yolk Color (YC) was 2-11 for white eggs and 2-14 for brown eggs. However, in general, eggs had similar YC in a package. This is the first report about the quality of commercial hen’s eggs from supermarkets in Argentina. Although eggs can belong to different hen's breeding systems and ages, there are some differences in the quality parameters studied between white and brown eggs.

Keywords:

Color egg shell, egg quality, eggs, supermarket

Article Metrics

294 Abstract Views
173 File Views
0 Downloads

License

Copyright (c) 2013 Asian Network for Scientific Information

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article Citation Metrics

Find Comparison of Quality Parameters in Hen’s Eggs According to Egg Shell Color on PlumX

How to Cite

Soria, M., Bueno , D., & Bernigaud, I. (2013). Comparison of Quality Parameters in Hen’s Eggs According to Egg Shell Color. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(4), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.224.234
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

1.
Aho, P. and C. Wright, 2010. La sustentabilidad y la industria avicola. Industria Avicola, Enero, pp: 12-38. http://www.industriaavicola-digital.com/industriaavicola/201001?pg=14#pg14.
2.
Anonymous, 1968. Reglamento de Inspeccion de Productos, Subproductos y Derivados de Origen Animal: Decreto, Issues 4238-4268. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Animal, Argentina.
3.
Anonymous, 2009. Egg cartons, our link with the consumer. Egg Ind., 114: 4-7.
4.
Arthur, J.A. and N. O'Sullivan, 2005. Breeding chickens to meet egg quality needs. Inter. Hatchery Pract., 19: 7-9.
5.
Bell, D.D., P.H. Patterson, K.W. Koelkebeck, K.E. Anderson and M.J. Darre et al., 2001. Egg marketing in national supermarkets: Egg quality part 1. Poult. Sci., 80: 383-389.
6.
Biladeau, A.M. and K.M. Keener, 2009. The effects of edible coatings on chicken egg quality under refrigerated storage. Poult. Sci., 88: 1266-1274.
7.
De Reu, K., K. Grijspeerdt, W. Messens, M. Heyndrickx, M. Uyttendaele, J. Debevere and L. Herman, 2006. Eggshell factors influencing eggshell penetration and whole egg contamination by different bacteria, including Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 112: 253-260.
8.
FAOUN, 2003. Egg Marketing: A Guide for the Production and Sale of Eggs. Food & Agriculture Org., Rome, Italy, ISBN: 9789251049327, Pages: 121.
9.
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, 2004. Salmonella in eggs and egg products. Risk Assessment Studies Report No. 16. http://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_rafs/files/egg_e.pdf.
10.
Galobart, J., R. Sala, X.E. Rincon-Carruyo, E.G. Manzanilla, B. Vila and J. Gasa, 2004. Egg yolk color as affected by saponification of different natural pigmenting sources. J. Applied Poult. Res., 13: 328-334.
11.
Hernandez, J.M., J. Seehawer, C. Hamelin, M. Bruni and W. Wakeman, 2002. Egg Quality, the European Consumer's Perception. Roche Vitamins Europe Ltd., Switzerland.
12.
Jacob, J.P., R.D. Miles and F.B. Mather, 2008. Egg quality. Animal Science Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Florida, pp: 1-12.
13.
Jones, D.R. and M.T. Musgrove, 2005. Correlation of eggshell strength and Salmonella Enteritidis contamination of commercial shell eggs. J. Food Prot., 68: 2035-2038.
14.
Jones, D.R., M.T. Musgrove, K.E. Anderson and H.S. Thesmar, 2010. Physical quality and composition of retail shell eggs. Poult. Sci., 89: 582-587.
15.
Jones, D.R., K.E. Anderson, P.A. Curtis and F.T. Jones, 2002. Microbial contamination in inoculated shell eggs: I. Effects of layer strain and hen age. Poult. Sci., 81: 715-720.
16.
Koelkebeck, K.W., D.D. Bell, J.B. Carey, K.E. Anderson and M.J. Darre, 2001. Egg marketing in national supermarkets: products, packaging and prices part 3. Poult. Sci., 80: 396-400.
17.
Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 2005. Commercial Poultry Nutrition. 3rd Edn., University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, ISBN-13: 9780969560050, Pages: 398.
18.
Messens, W., K. Grijspeerdt and L. Herman, 2005. Eggshell penetration by Salmonella: A review. World Poult. Sci. J., 61: 71-86.
19.
Mine, Y., 2007. Egg proteins and peptides in human health-chemistry, bioactivity and production. Curr. Pharm. Des., 13: 875-884.
20.
Peebles, E.D. and C. McDaniel, 2004. A practical manual for understanding the shell structure of broiler hatching eggs and measurements of their quality. Office of Agricultural Communications, Mississippi State University, pp: 1-16. http://msucares.com/pubs/bulletins/b1139.pdf.
21.
Rossman, A.J. and B.L. Chance, 1998. Workshop Statistics: Discovery with Data and Minitab. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
22.
Scott, T.A. and F.G. Silversides, 2000. The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poult. Sci., 79: 1725-1729.
23.
Sekeroglu, A. and E. Altuntas, 2009. Effects of egg weight on egg quality characteristics. J. Sci. Food Agric., 89: 379-383.
24.
Shi, S.R., K.H. Wang, T.C. Dou and H.M. Yang, 2009. Egg weight affected some egg quality traits of chicken eggs. J. Food Agric. Environ., 7: 432-434.
25.
United State Department of Agriculture, 2000. Egg Grading Manual. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., UAS.
26.
Vuilleumier, J.P., 1969. The Roche yolk colour fan-an instrument for measuring yolk colour. Poult. Sci., 48: 767-779.
27.
Wall, H., L. Jonsson and L. Johansson, 2010. Effects on egg quality traits of genotype and diets with mussel meal oro wheat-distillers dried grains with solubles. Poult. Sci., 89: 745-751.
28.
Wei, R. and J.J. Bitgood, 1990. A new objective measurement of eggshell color. 1. A test for potential usefulness of two color measuring devices. Poult. Sci., 69: 1775-1780.
29.
Windhorst, H.W., 2009. Recent patterns of egg production and trade: A status report on a regional basis. World's Poult. Sci. J., 65: 685-707.
30.
Yang, H.M., Z.Y. Wang and J. Lu, 2009. Study on the relationship between eggshell colors and egg quality as well as shell ultrastructure in Yangzhou chicken. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 2898-2902.
31.
Mine, Y., C. Oberle and Z. Kassaify, 2003. Eggshell matrix proteins as defense mechanism of avian eggs. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 249-253.
32.
Zita, L., E. Tumova and L. Stolc, 2009. Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78: 85-91.