Research Article
Open Access
Effect of Different Protein Levels on Arabi Chicken Performance
Abstract
It is important to note that feeding cost can reach up to 60-75% of the total farm production cost. This study investigated some feeding management practices needed by the Arabi chickens during the brooding phase. Three different feed rations were fed to Arabi chickens and the effect of these feed rations on the performance was evaluated. These feed rations contained three different levels of dietary protein: 18, 21 and 22%. Variables measured included body weight feed consumption and feed efficiency. Results showed that there was no significantly different protein levels indicating that using a diet with 18% protein level is as satisfactory as those with 21 and 22%. Therefore, a lower protein level can be possibly fed reducing the cost of feed. In conclusion, feeding a diet treatment with 18% protein is recommended for the Arabi chickens.
Keywords:
Arabi chickens, brooding, feed efficiencyArticle Metrics
99
Abstract Views
107
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Al-Khalifa , H., & Al-Nasser, A. (2012). Effect of Different Protein Levels on Arabi Chicken Performance. International Journal of Poultry Science, 11(11), 706–709. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2012.706.709
References
1.
Abdelqader, A., M. Gauly, C.B.A. Wollny and M.N. Abo-Shehada, 2008. Prevalence and burden of gastrointestinal helminthes among local chickens, in Northern Jordan. Prev. Vet. Med., 85: 17-22.
2.
Abdelqader, A., C.B.A. Wollny and M. Gauly, 2008. On-farm investigation of local chicken biodiversity and performance potentials in rural areas of Jordan. Anim. Genet. Resour., 43: 49-57.
3.
Al-Haddad, A., A. Al-Nasser, M. Mashaly and A. Al-Saffar, 2005. Study of the production efficiency of the acclimatized Al-Arabi chicken (FA031G). Technical Report KISR 7997.
4.
Al-Khalaifa, H. and A. Al-Nasser, 2006. Improve Arabian chickens performance in Kuwait by nutrition and feeding management: Phase I-growing period (FA066C). Final Report KISR No. 8379.
5.
Al-Nasser, A., A. Al-Haddad, A. Al-Saffar and K. Holleman, 1998. Classification and evaluation of non-commercial poultry breeds in Kuwait (FA001G). Technical Report KISR No. 7818.
6.
Al-Nasser, A., K. Holleman, H. Al-khalifa and A. Al-Saffar, 1998. Improvement of broiler performance. Technical Report KISR 5319.
7.
Al-Nasser, A., K. Holleman, A. Al-Saffar, S. Behbehani, H. Al-Khalaifa and A. Al-Haddad, 1998. Improving egg production efficiency. ISR Annual Research Report, 45-48.
8.
Al-Yousef, Y.M., 2007. A survey study on the distribution of Saudi Baladi chickens and their characteristics. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 289-292.
9.
Alders, R.G. and R.A.E. Pym, 2009. Village poultry: Still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World's Poult. Sci. J., 65: 181-190.
10.
Yami, A., 1995. Poultry production in Ethiopia. World's Poult. Sci. J., 51: 197-201.
11.
Anderson, K.E., 2011. Comparison of fatty acid, cholesterol and vitamin A and E composition in eggs from hens housed in conventional cage and range production facilities. Poult. Sci., 90: 1600-1608.
12.
Baset, M.A., M.M. Bhuiyan and M.M. Islam, 2000. Performance of fayoumi chicken under different rearing systems in Sylhet district. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 29: 105-110.
13.
Bassler, A., P. Ciszuk and K. Sjelin, 1999. Management of laying hens in mobile houses-a review of experiences. Proceedings of NJF Seminar on Ecological Animal Husbandry in the Nordic Countries, September 16-17, 1999, Denmark, pp: 45-50.
14.
Bell, D.D., 2001. Egg Production and Egg Weight Standards for Table-Egg Layers. In: Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production, Bell, D.D. and W.D. Weaver (Eds.). 5th Edn., Springer, USA., pp: 1079-1090.
15.
Clark, M.S. and S.H. Gage, 1996. Effects of free-range chickens and geese on insect pests and weeds in an agroecosystem. Am. J. Alternat. Agric., 11: 39-47.
16.
Dessie, T. and B.A. Ogle, 1996. A survey of village poultry production in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
17.
Eriksson, J., G. Larson, U. Gunnarsson, B. Bedhom and M. Tixier-Boichard et al., 2008. Identification of the Yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet., Vol. 4.
18.
FAO, 2003. Prospects for Aggregate Agriculture and Major Commodity Groups. In: World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: An FAO Perspective, Bruinsma, J. (Ed.). Food and Agriculture Organization, USA., pp: 85-95.
19.
Fayeye, T.R., K.L. Ayorinde, V. Ojo and O.M. Adesina, 2006. Frequency and influence of some major genes on body weight and body size parameters of Nigerian local chickens. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 18.
20.
Walker, A. and S. Gordon, 2003. Symposium on 'Nutrition of farm animals outdoors' Intake of nutrients from pasture by poultry. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 62: 253-256.
21.
Kaya, M. and M.A. Yildiz, 2008. Genetic diversity among Turkish native chickens, denizli and gerze, estimated by microsatellite markers. Biochem. Genet., 46: 480-491.
22.
Mungube, E.O., S.M. Bauni, B.A. Tenhagen, L.W. Wamae, S.M. Nzioka, L. Muhammed and J.M. Nginyi, 2008. Prevalence of parasites of the local scavenging chickens in a selected semi-arid zone of Eastern Kenya. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 40: 101-109.
23.
Rashid, M.M., M.N. Islam, B.C. Roy, K. Jakobsen and C. Lauridsen, 2004. Effect of dietary supplementation of energy and protein on production performance and egg quality of scavenging crossbred hens in rural areas under tropical conditions. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 16.
24.
SAS., 1996. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
25.
Schmidt, P.E., 2000. Semi scavenging poultry production model: Role in egg and meat production in rural Bangladesh. Report of the XX World's Poultry Congress.
26.
Soller, M., S. Weigend, M.N. Romanov, J.C.M. Dekkers and S.J. Lamont, 2006. Strategies to assess structural variation in the chicken genome and its associations with biodiversity and biological performance. Poult. Sci., 85: 2061-2078.
27.
USDA, 2010. Livestock and poultry: World market trade. United States Department of Agriculture, USA.
28.
Wimmers, K., S. Ponsuksili, T. Hardge, A. Valle-Zarate, P.K. Mathur and P. Horst, 2000. Genetic distinctness of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Anim. Genet., 31: 159-165.
