Research Article Open Access

Evaluating Different Vaccine Routes Against Coccidiosis

Authors

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Marina Bolzani Saad
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Tania Dello Monaco Martins Bona
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Clovis Augusto Versalli Serafini
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Francine Romani
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Joelma Moura Alvarez
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Mariana Camargo Lourenco
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
|
Elizabeth Santin
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Parana-UFPR, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil
DOI 10.3923/ijps.2009.980.984
PDF

Abstract

The effect of coccidiosis vaccine route on animal development and the efficiency of different routes to protect birds against different Eimeria challenges were evaluated. 135 Isa Brown® birds were used in two experimental phases. In the first phase, the birds were distributed in three treatments: non-vaccinated, vaccinated against coccidiosis by water and vaccinated by spray. In the second phase, these birds were challenged separately with different eimeria species oocysts (E. maximum, E. acervulina, E. tenella and E. necatrix). Weight gain, relative weight of Fabricius bursa, degrees of lesions in the intestines and counting of oocysts in the coproparasitological examination were evaluated. As a result, in most cases, birds challenged with different eimeria species and vaccinated against coccidiosis, by water or spray, showed better physical conditions, mainly by: best weight gain and lower intestinal lesions scores, compared to the birds challenged and non-vaccinated. Another interesting result refers to the different vaccine routes, showing no significant difference regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine and the vaccine reaction in animals.

Keywords:

Administration routes, coccidiosis, poultry, vaccination

Article Metrics

97 Abstract Views
89 File Views
0 Downloads

Article Citation Metrics

How to Cite

Saad, M. B., Bona, T. D. M. M., Serafini, C. A. V., Romani, F., Alvarez, J. M., Lourenco, M. C., & Santin, E. (2009). Evaluating Different Vaccine Routes Against Coccidiosis. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8(10), 980–984. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.980.984

References

1.
Chapman, H.D., T.E. Cherry, H.D. Danforth, G. Richards, M.W. Shirley and R.B. Williams, 2002. Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: The role of live vaccines. Int. J. Parasitol., 32: 617-629.
2.
Johnson, J. and W.M. Reid, 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol., 28: 30-36.
3.
Joyner, L.P. and C.C. Norton, 1973. The immunity arising from continuos low-level infections with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology, 67: 907-913.
4.
Kawazoe, U., 2000. Coccidiose. In: Doenca Das Aves, Berchieri, A. and M. Macari (Eds.). University of Campinas, Brazil, pp: 391-406.
5.
Hoffmann, R.P., 1987. Diagnostico de Parasitismo Veterinario. Sulina, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Pages: 156.
6.
National Research Council, 1994. Nutrient Requeriments of Poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC., pp: 155.
7.
Schetters, T.P.M., H.A.J.M. Jansen and A.N. Vermeulen, 1999. A New Vaccination Concept Against Coccidiosis in Poultry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp: 13-14.
8.
Vermeulen, A.N., D.C. Schaap and T.P.M. Schetters, 2001. Control of coccidiosis in chickens by vaccination. Vet. Parasitol., 100: 13-20.
9.
Williams, R.B., 1999. A compartmentalised model for the estimation of the cost of coccidiosis to the world's chicken production industry. Int. J. Parasitol., 29: 1209-1229.
10.
Williams, R.B., 1998. Epidemiological aspects of the use of live anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Int. J. Parasitol., 28: 1089-1098.

Most read articles by the same author(s)