Effects of Intact Carcass Electrical Stimulation on Moisture Retention Characteristics of Polyphosphate-Treated Non-Aged Boneless Broiler Breast Fillets


Authors

  • L.L. Young Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA P 0 Box 5677, Athens, GA USA 30604
  • D.P. Smith Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA P 0 Box 5677, Athens, GA USA 30604
  • J.A. Cason Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA P 0 Box 5677, Athens, GA USA 30604
  • J.M. Walker Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, ARS, USDA P 0 Box 5677, Athens, GA USA 30604

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.796.798

Keywords:

Electrical stimulation, marinade, moisture, polyphosphate, poultry

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate combined effects of whole carcass electrical stimulation and polyphosphates on moisture absorption and retention by marinated non-aged boneless chicken breast fillets. Breast fillets were harvested from electrically stimulated and non-stimulated carcasses immediately after chilling. Half were immediately marinated in saline solution and half in a similar solution containing sodium tripolyphosphate. Muscle pH before and after marination, marinade absorption and cooking loss were recorded. Electrical stimulation immediately depressed muscle pH, but polyphosphate marination mitigated that trend somewhat. Electrical stimulation improved marinade absorption (10.6±0.3% verses 8.8±0.3%) but did not affect cooking loss. Polyphosphates did not affect marinade absorption, but significantly reduced cooking losses (17.3±0.4% verses 14.1±0.4%). No marinade by electrical treatment interactions affecting moisture absorption or retention by the fillets were detected.

Downloads

Published

2004-11-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Young, L., Smith, D., Cason, J., & Walker, J. (2004). Effects of Intact Carcass Electrical Stimulation on Moisture Retention Characteristics of Polyphosphate-Treated Non-Aged Boneless Broiler Breast Fillets. International Journal of Poultry Science, 3(12), 796–798. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.796.798

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2