Evaluation of the Growth of the Bursa of Fabricius in Broilers Reared under Different Light Photoperiods


Authors

  • Nikhil Nuthalapati College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
  • Hammed A. Olanrewaju USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762-5367, USA
  • Scott L. Branton USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762-5367, USA
  • Gregory T. Pharr College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.481.485

Keywords:

Broiler health, Bursa of fabricius, light intensity, light source, photoperiod

Abstract

Background and Objective: Previous studies have investigated the interaction of different light sources and light intensity. Studies are lacking concerning the effect of different light sources and photoperiods on broiler growth and health. The results reported here are a part of a larger study to evaluate the interaction of different light sources with different photoperiods on the growth of the bursa of fabricius. Materials and Methods: Twelve treatments were designed as a 3×4 factorial arrangement of 4 light sources, incandescent (ICD, control), compact fluorescent light (CFL), light emitting diode (LED) and poultry specific filtered LED (PSF-LED) with 3 different photo periods (short, regular and long). A total of 4 trials were conducted. For each trial a total of 720 broiler chickens were reared under the various light treatments from 8-43 days of age. At 43 days of age, 2 males and 2 females from each treatment group were weighed and then euthanatized for dissection to collect the bursa. The bursas were weighed and the bursa-to-body ratio calculated. Results: The interaction of light source, photoperiod and sex did not have a statistically significant effect on the bursa-to-body weight ratios. Conclusion: The light sources investigated did not have a negative effect on broiler health.

References

USDA., 2016. Poultry-production and value 2015 summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, USA.

Olanrewaju, H.A., J.P. Thaxton, W.A. Dozier III, J. Purswell, W.B. Roush and S.L. Branton, 2006. A review of lighting programs for broiler production. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 301-308.

Archer, G.S., 2016. Comparison of raising broiler chickens under light emitting diode or incandescent light at differing intensities on growth, stress and fear. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 15: 425-431.

Olanrewaju, H.A., J.L. Purswell, S.D. Collier and S.L. Branton, 2016. Interactive effects of ambient temperature and light sources at high relative humidity on growth performance and blood physiological variables in broilers grown to 42 day of age. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 15: 394-400.

Huth, J.C. and G.S. Archer, 2015. Comparison of two LED light bulbs to a dimmable CFL and their effects on broiler chicken growth, stress and fear. Poult. Sci., 94: 2027-2036.

Olanrewaju, H.A., J.L. Purswell, W.R. Maslin, S.D. Collier and S.L. Branton, 2015. Effects of color temperatures (kelvin) of LED bulbs on growth performance, carcass characteristics and ocular development indices of broilers grown to heavy weights. Poult. Sci., 94: 338-344.

Olanrewaju, H.A., W.W. Miller, W.R. Maslin, S.D. Collier, J.L. Purswell and S.L. Branton, 2016. Effects of light sources and intensity on broilers grown to heavy weights. Part 1: Growth performance, carcass characteristics and welfare indices. Poult. Sci., 95: 727-735.

Rault, J.L., K. Clark, P.J. Groves and G.M. Cronin, 2016. Light intensity of 5 or 20 lux on broiler behavior, welfare and productivity. Poult. Sci., 96: 779-787.

Olanrewaju, H.A., W.W. Miller, W.R. Maslin, S.D. Collier, J.L. Purswell and S.L. Branton, 2015. Influence of photoperiod, light intensity and their interaction on health indices of modern broilers grown to heavy weights. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 183-190.

Puvadolpirod, S. and J.P. Thaxton, 2000. Model of physiological stress in chickens 1. Response parameters. Poult. Sci., 79: 363-369.

Vicuna, E.A., V.A. Kuttappan, R. Galarza-Seeber, J.D. Latorre and O.B. Faulkner et al., 2015. Effect of dexamethasone in feed on intestinal permeability, differential white blood cell counts and immune organs in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 94: 2075-2080.

Cazaban, C., N.M. Masferrer, R.D. Pascual, M.N. Espadamala, T. Costa and Y. Gardin, 2015. Proposed bursa of fabricius weight to body weight ratio standard in commercial broilers. Poult. Sci., 94: 2088-2093.

Glick, B., 1984. Interrelation of the avian immune and neuroendocrine systems. J. Exp. Zool. Part A: Ecol. Genet. Physiol., 232: 671-682.

Vriend, J., T. Oishi and R.G. Domey, 1975. Effects of light environment on the weight of bursa of Fabricius in White Rock chicks. Growth, 39: 53-66.

Kliger, C.A., A.E. Gehad, R.M. Hulet, W.B. Roush, H.S. Lillehoj and M.M. Mashaly, 2000. Effects of photoperiod and melatonin on lymphocyte activities in male broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 79: 18-25.

Mehaisen, G.M.K., M.G. Eshak, A.M. Elkaiaty, A.M. Atta, M.M. Mashaly and A.O. Abass, 2017. Comprehensive growth performance, immune function, plasma biochemistry, gene expressions and cell death morphology responses to a daily corticosterone injection course in broiler chickens. PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 2.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Nuthalapati, N., Olanrewaju, H. A., Branton, S. L., & Pharr, G. T. (2017). Evaluation of the Growth of the Bursa of Fabricius in Broilers Reared under Different Light Photoperiods. International Journal of Poultry Science, 16(12), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.481.485

Most read articles by the same author(s)