Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Naked Neck and Frizzle Genotypes Based on Microsatellite Markers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.118.124Keywords:
Biodiversity, frizzle gene, genetic diversity, major genes, microsatellites, naked neck geneAbstract
Background and Objective: The identification of genetic diversity for heat resistance genotypes, such as naked neck (Na) and frizzle (F) genes, is of great interest for scientists to be discovered along with the native breeds genetic map recognition. Since they represent the most important genotype flocks raised in tropical and semi-tropical areas. The extent of feather (or plumage distribution) and feather shape (straight or curled) divergence between both genotypes (whether homozygous or heterozygous state) morphologically, comparing with normally feather flock, need to be clarified using microsatellite markers technique side by side with productive performance. Methodology: According to morphological appearance of feather coverage, a total number of 326 birds, representing 5 genotypes (homozygous naked neck (NaNa), heterozygous naked neck (Nana), homozygous frizzle (FF), heterozygous frizzle (Ff) and normally feathered (nanaff) genotypes) were classified. At sexual maturity, the chickens were individually housed in wire cages located in semi-closed house. Adult body weight, age at sexual maturity, egg number and egg weight were recorded for each genotype throughout the first six month of laying cycle. At 30 weeks of age, egg quality characteristics were examined. Forty birds were randomly assigned (8 birds/genotype) to assess cell mediated immunity through PHA-P injection in wattles. Blood samples were collected from the wing vein. The DNA was purified by successive extraction with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1), respectively. A total of 20 microsatellite markers were selected based on the degree of polymorphism reported in the literature. The PCR amplification was carried out in 25 μL reaction volumes, gels were stained in ethidium bromide and DNA bands were visualized on UV-transilluminator. Data of SSR analyses were scored on the basis of the presence or absence of the amplified products for each primer. The similarity coefficients were then used to construct a dendrogram by Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetical Average (UPGMA). Results: The productive results revealed that the introducing Na and F genes in chicken breeds raised under hot weather significantly improved most of egg production and eggshell quality traits. Moreover, significantly higher cell mediated response was found in naked neck and frizzle genotypes particularly, in homozygous manner compared to normally feathered genotype. The results revealed that the microsatellite markers had 83 alleles with an average of 4.2±0.24 alleles per locus. It could be observed that polymorphism ranged from 25-100% with an average of 64.7% for all markers. A remarkable extensive genetic diversity was seen among the studied genotypes. Genetic distance as a pair-wise comparison of different genotype ranged from 0.14 (NaNa-Nana) to 0.41 (Nana-FF). Both naked neck genotypes and frizzle sibs located in a separate sub-cluster resulted in a clear distinction between the two major genes. Conclusion: It was concluded that the evaluation of genetic diversity among chicken genotypes carrying Na or F based on the studied microsatellite markers was efficient and gained consistent results.
References
Fathi, M.M., A. Galal, S. El-Safty and M. Mahrous, 2013. Naked neck and frizzle genes for improving chickens raised under high ambient temperature: I. growth performance and egg production. World's Poult. Sci. J., 69: 813-832.
Fathi, M.M., A. Galal, S. El-Safty and M. Mahrous, 2014. Naked neck and frizzle genes for improving chickens raised under high ambient temperature: II. Blood parameters and immunity. World's Poult. Sci. J., 70: 165-172.
Mothibedi, K., S.J. Nsoso, E.E. Waugh and P.M. Kgwatalala, 2016. Growth performance of purebred naked neck tswana and black Australorp x naked neck tswana crossbred chickens under an intensive management system in Botswana. Int. J. Livest. Res., 6: 6-14.
Milosevic, N., L. Peric, M.D. Stojcic, S. Trivunovic, V. Rodic and S. Bjedov, 2013. Autochthonous hen breeds in the Republic of Serbia-Banat naked neck and Sombor crested. World's Poult. Sci. J., 69: 153-162.
Yacoub, H.A. and M.M. Fathi, 2013. Phylogenetic analysis using d-loop marker of mtDNA of Saudi native chicken strains. Mitochondr. DNA., 24: 538-551.
Lyimo, C.M., A. Weigend, P.L. Msoffe, H. Eding, H. Simianer and S. Weigend, 2014. Global diversity and genetic contributions of chicken populations from African, Asian and European regions. Anim. Genet., 45: 836-848.
Ceccobelli, S., P. Di Lorenzo, H. Lancioni, L.V.M. Ibanez and M.T. Tejedor et al., 2015. Genetic diversity and phylogeographic structure of sixteen Mediterranean chicken breeds assessed with microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Livest. Sci., 175: 27-36.
Granevitze, Z., J. Hillel, G.H. Chen, N.T.K. Cuc, M. Feldman, M. Eding and S. Weigend, 2007. Genetic diversity within chicken populations from different continents and management histories. Anim. Genet., 38: 576-583.
Eltanany, M. and O. Distl, 2010. Genetic diversity and genealogical origins of domestic chicken. World's Poult. Sci. J., 66: 715-726.
Wilkinson, S., P. Wiener, D. Teverson, C.S. Haley and P.M. Hocking, 2012. Characterization of the genetic diversity, structure and admixture of British chicken breeds. Anim. Genet., 43: 552-563.
Ramadan, S., B.B. Kayang, E. Inoue, K. Nirasawa, H. Hayakawa, S.I. Ito and M. Inoue-Murayama, 2012. Evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation priorities for Egyptian chickens. Open J. Anim. Sci., 2: 183-190.
Abebe, A.S., S. Mikko and A.M. Johansson, 2015. Genetic diversity of five local Swedish chicken breeds detected by microsatellite markers. PloS One, Vol. 10.
Fathi, M.M., I. Al-Homidan, M.I. Motawei, O.K. Abou-Emera and M.F. El-Zarei, 2017. Evaluation of genetic diversity of Saudi native chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Poult. Sci., 96: 530-536.
Wimmers, K., S. Ponsuksili, T. Hardge, A. Valle-Zarate, P.K. Mathur and P. Horst, 2000. Genetic distinctness of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Anim. Genet., 31: 159-165.
Pandey, A.K., B. Mishra, P. Chaudhary, M.S. Tania and R.K. Vijh, 2003. Microsatellite analysis in three breeds of Indian poultry. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 73: 788-792.
Pirany, N., M.N. Romanov, S.P. Ganpule, G. Devegowda and D.T. Prasad, 2007. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Indian chicken populations. J. Poult. Sci., 44: 19-28.
FAO., 2004. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. Measurement of Domestic Animal Diversity (Mo-DAD): Recommended microsatellite markers. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Nei, M. and W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 76: 5269-5273.
Rholf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate System. Version 2.1., Exeter Publishing, Setauket, USA.
Chen, C.F., A. Bordas and M. Tixier-Boichard, 2002. Effect of high ambient temperature and naked neck genotype on egg production in purebred and crossbred dwarf brown-egg layers selected for improved clutch length. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, 2002, Montpellier, France.
El-Safty, S.A., 2006. Influence of naked neck, frizzle, crest genes and their triple segregation on productivity of layer chickens under hot environmental conditions. Egypt. Poult. Sci., 26: 1253-1267.
Mahrous, M.Y. and A.E.M. El-Dlebshany, 2011. Reduction of the cholesterol content of eggs by introducing naked neck (NA) and frizzle (F) genes in laying hens. Egypt. Poult. Sci., 31: 817-824.
Galal, A., 2000. Pleiotropic effects of naked neck, frizzled and double segregation genes on some phenotypic and genetic parameters of chickens under hot environmental conditions. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J., 20: 945-960.
Alvarez, T., E. Carrasco, P. Tato and G. Tellez, 2002. Comparison of production parameters and egg quality between laying hens indigenous naked neck (Na) and commercial Babcock B-380. Proceeding of the 91st Poultry Science Annual Meeting, August 11-14, 2002, University of Delaware, USA.
Fathi, M.M., A. Galal, S.A. El-Safty and S.A. Abdel-Fattah, 2005. Impact of naked neck and frizzle genes on cell-mediated immunity of chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J., 25: 1055-1067.
Nazmi, A., 2006. Study on immunogenetic differences in naked neck and normally feathered chickens. M.Sc. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Mahrous, M., A. Galal, M.M. Fathi and A.Z. El-Dein, 2008. Impact of naked neck (Na) and frizzle (F) genes on growth performance and immunocompetence in chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 45-54.
Ya-Bo, Y., W. Jin-Yu, D.M. Mekki, T. Qing-Ping and L. Hui-Fang et al., 2006. Evaluation of genetic diversity and genetic distance between twelve Chinese indigenous chicken breeds based on microsatellite markers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 550-556.
Shahbazi, S., S.Z. Mirhosseini and M.N. Romanov, 2007. Genetic diversity in five iranian native chicken populations estimated by microsatellite markers. Biochem. Genet., 45: 63-75.
Nassiri, M.T.B., Z. Hamidi and S. Tavakoli, 2007. The investigation of genetic variation at microsatellite loci in mazandaran native chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 675-678.
Hillel, J., M.A.M. Groenen, M. Tixier-Boichard, A.B. Korol and L. David et al., 2003. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35: 533-557.
Rosenberg, N.A., T. Burke, K. Elo, M.W. Feldman and P.J. Freidlin et al., 2001. Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics, 159: 699-713.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.