Evaluation of the Antibiotic Properties of Probiotics and their Efficacy on Performance and Immune Response in Broiler Chicken


Authors

  • E.N. Ngunyangi Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536-20115, Egerton, Njoro, Nakuru, Kenya
  • J.K. Tuitoek Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536-20115, Egerton, Njoro, Nakuru, Kenya
  • M.K. Ambula Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536-20115, Egerton, Njoro, Nakuru, Kenya
  • A.M. Wachira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.393.403

Keywords:

Antibody response, broilers, growth performance, inhibitory effect, probiotics

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the extent of use of probiotics in the poultry feed industry and their efficacy in broiler diets. Methodology: Two surveys involving 100 agro vets and 36 poultry farmers were carried out. Fifteen brands of probiotics 0were found in agro vets with Product 1, 2, 3 and Product 4 being common. A total of 74.4% of the farmers used probiotics and Product 1, 7, 2 and Product 4 were common. Three hundred and seven, day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to dietary treatments; Control diet, Diet 2 (Product 1), Diet 3 (Control+Product 4), Diet 4 (Control+Product 7) and Diet 5 (Product 2). Disk diffusion test was used to test the inhibitory effect of probiotics on bacteria cultures; Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Candida albicans. Results: Probiotics had no significant effect (p>0.05) on daily weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio during starter phase. Performance was not significantly affected by probiotics during the finisher phase except for Product 2 which depressed growth. Blood samples were collected to test the effects of probiotics on antibody response to Infectious Bursal Disease virus and they had no significant effect (p = 0.6868). Product 4 and 7 had an inhibitory effect while Product 1 and 2 did not. Conclusion: Performance of broilers was not affected by the inclusion of probiotics in the diet.

References

Thornton, P.K., 2010. Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 365: 2853-2867.

Udo, H.M.J., H.A. Aklilu, L.T. Phong, R.H. Bosma and I.G.S. Budisatria et al., 2011. Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop-livestock systems. Livest. Sci., 139: 22-29.

Yegani, M. and D.R. Korver, 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult. Sci., 87: 2052-2063.

EU., 2005. Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect: Regulation 1831/2003/ec on additives for use in animal nutrition, replacing directive 700/524//eec on additives in feedstuffs. European Union Commission, Brussels.

Palamidi, I., K. Fegeros, M. Mohnl, W.H. Abdelrahman, G. Schatzmayr, G. Theodoropoulos and K.C. Mountzouris, 2016. Probiotic form effects on growth performance, digestive function and immune related biomarkers in broilers. Poult. Sci., 95: 1598-1608.

Atela, J.A., J. Tuitoek, P.A. Onjoro and N.K. Kibitok, 2015. Effects of probiotics feeding technology on weight gain of indigenous chicken in Kenya. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 8: 33-36.

Cochran, W.G., 1963. Sampling Techniques. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, ISBN-13: 978-0471162384, Pages: 413.

NRC., 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780309048927, Pages: 176.

Samanya, M. and K.E. Yamauchi, 2002. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comparat. Biochem. Physiol. A: Mol. Integrat. Physiol., 133: 95-104.

Ghahri, H., T. Toloei and B. Soleimani, 2013. Efficacy of antibiotic, probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, intestinal histomorphology and immune response in broiler chickens. Global J. Anim. Scient. Res., 1: 25-41.

Fernandes, B.C.S., M.R.F.B. Martins, A.A. Mendes, E.L. Milbradt and C. Sanfelice et al., 2014. Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 16: 417-424.

Pelicano, E.R.L., P.A. Souza, H.B.A. Souza, A. Oba, E.A. Norkus, L.M. Kodawara and T.M.A. Lima, 2004. Performance of broilers fed diets containing natural growth promoters. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 6: 231-236.

Mahdavi, A.H., H.R. Rahmani and J. Pourreza, 2005. Effect of probiotic supplements on egg quality and laying hen's performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 488-492.

Li, Y.B., Q.Q. Xu, C.J. Yang, X. Yang and L. Lv et al., 2014. Effects of probiotics on the growth performance and intestinal micro flora of broiler chickens. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 27: 713-717.

Rahman, M.S., A. Mustari, M. Salauddin and M.M. Rahman, 2013. Effects of probiotics and enzymes on growth performance and haematobiochemical parameters in broilers. J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ., 11: 111-118.

Wondmeneh, E., T. Getachew and T. Dessie. 2011. Effect of effective microorganisms (EM®) on the growth parameters of Fayoumi and Horro chicken Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10: 185-188.

Fatufe, A.A. and I.O. Matanmi, 2008. The effect of probiotics supplementation on the growth performance of two strains of cockerels. J. Center Eur. Agric., 9: 405-410.

Ashayerizadeh, A., N. Dabiri, K. Mirzadeh and M.R. Ghorbani, 2011. Effects of dietary inclusion of several biological feed additives on growth response of broiler chickens. J. Cell Anim. Biol., 5: 61-65.

Landy, N. and A. Kavyani, 2013. Effects of using a multi-strain probiotic on performance, immune responses and cecal microflora composition in broiler chickens reared under cyclic heat stress condition. Iran. J. Applied Anim. Sci., 3: 703-708.

Fox, S.M., 1988. Probiotics: Intestinal inoculants for production animals. Vet. Med., 83: 806-830.

Fuller, R., 2006. Reasons for the apparent variation in the probiotic response. Biologia, 61: 751-754.

Bahlevi, T., U.S. Ucan, B. Coskun, V. Kortoglu and S. Cetingul, 2009. Effect of dietary probiotic on performance and humoral immune response in layer hens. Arch. Zootechn., 12: 14-23.

Seifert, S., C. Fritz, N. Carlini, S.W. Barth, C.M.A.P. Franz and B. Watzl, 2011. Modulation of innate and adaptive immunity by the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum PCB133 in turkeys 1. Poult. Sci., 90: 2275-2280.

Khalifa, E., E. Gomaa, A.E.R. Abd El-Mageed, N. Atef and K. Abd El-Latif, 2014. Effect of probiotics and Escherichia coli infection on performance of some viral vaccination in broiler chicks. Anim. Health Res. J., 2: 69-78.

Dalloul, R.A., H.S. Lillehoj, T.A. Shellem and J.A. Doerr, 2003. Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poult. Sci., 82: 62-66.

Ouwehand, A.C. and S. Vesterlund, 2004. Antimicrobial Components from Lactic Acid Bacteria. In: Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects, Salminen, S., A.V. Wright and A. Ouwehand (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 375-395.

Kaboosi, H., 2011. Antibacterial effects of probiotics isolated from yoghurts against some common bacterial pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 5: 4363-4367.

Alwan, A.H., A.H. Alsakini and F.N. Abdulrassak, 2014. The protective effect of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces boulardii) against infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Applied Sci., 3: 886-890.

Wilson, D., 2017. A tale of two yeasts: Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a therapeutic against candidiasis. Virulence, 8: 15-17.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Ngunyangi , E., Tuitoek, J., Ambula, M., & Wachira, A. (2019). Evaluation of the Antibiotic Properties of Probiotics and their Efficacy on Performance and Immune Response in Broiler Chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18(8), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.393.403