Storage Stability of Khaki Campbell Duck (Anas platyrhynchos Domesticus) Eggs at Room Temperature


Authors

  • Kanda Lokaewmanee Faculty of Natural Resources and Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University Chalermprakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.393.402

Keywords:

Egg, Khaki Campbell duck, storage stability, temperature

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the quality of 930 Khaki Campbell duck eggs under storage conditions at 30°C and 78% relative humidity, for 0-30 days. Methodology: During the 31-day storage period, 30 duck eggs/day were evaluated for the shape index, albumen index, yolk index, shell color (L*, a* and b*), specific gravity, shell breaking strength, shell thickness, Haugh unit, yolk color, pH of albumen, pH of yolk, albumen percentage, yolk percentage and shell percentage. Results: The storage period had no statistically significant effect on the shell strength, pH of albumen, pH of yolk, albumen percentage, yolk percentage and shell percentage (p>0.05). In addition, the shape index, albumen index, yolk index, shell color (L*, a* and b*), specific gravity, shell thickness, Haugh unit and yolk color were significantly affected by the storage period (p<0.05). The Haugh unit values decreased significantly when the storage period lengthened (p<0.01). Conclusion: These results showed that Khaki Campbell duck eggs stored for 11 days at 30°C and 78% relative humidity still maintained relatively good internal quality characteristics for human consumption.

References

Hasler, C.M., 2000. The changing face of functional foods. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 19: 499S-506S.

Braun, P., 2000. Freshness of table eggs during storage. World Poult., 16: 41-41.

Keener, K.M., K.C. McAvoy, J.B. Foegeding, P.A. Curtis, K.E. Anderson and J.A. Osborne, 2006. Effect of testing temperature on internal egg quality measurements. Poult. Sci., 85: 550-555.

Jones, D.R., 2007. Egg functionality and quality during long-term storage. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 157-162.

Bird, R.S., 1986. The Future of Modern Duck Production Breeds and Housing in South- East Asia. In: Duck Production Science and World Practice, Farrell, D.J. and P. Stapleton (Edn.). University of New England, Armidale, Australia, pp: 229-237.

Lengkey, H.A.W., S. Darana and T. Widjastuti, 2012. The effect of length of storage on albumen thickness and acidity of duck egg. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Lasi, Indonesia.

Cherry, P. and T.R. Morris, 2008. Domestic Duck Production: Science and Practice. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK., ISBN: 9781845934415, Pages: 239.

Pandian, C., A. Sundaresan, K. Sangilimadan, A.V. Omprakash, M. Babu and R. Prabakaran, 2012. Effect of different storage periods on egg quality traits of Ducks. J. Life Sci., 6: 871-873.

Daghir, N.J., 2001. Poultry Production in Hot Climates. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK.

Soniya, E.B. and S.E.J. Swan, 2004. Manual for small scale poultry production. Technical Guide.

Yilmaz, A.A. and Z. Bozkurt, 2009. Effects of hen age, storage period and stretch film packaging on internal and external quality traits of table eggs. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 42: 462-469.

Lokaewmanee, K., K. Yamauchi, T. Komori and K. Saito, 2011. Enhancement of yolk color in raw and boiled egg yolk with lutein from marigold flower meal and marigold flower extract. J. Poult. Sci., 48: 25-32.

Tilki, M. and M. Saatci, 2004. Effects of storage time on external and internal characteristics in partridge (Alectoris graeca) eggs. Rev. Med. Vet., 155: 561-564.

SAS., 1997. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill, New York, United States, ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633.

Samli, H.E., A. Agma and N. Senkoylu, 2005. Effects of storage time and temperature on egg quality in old laying hens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 14: 548-553.

Lapao, C., L.T. Gama and M.C. Soares, 1999. Effects of broiler breeder age and length of egg storage on albumen characteristics and hatchability. Poult. Sci., 78: 640-645.

USDA., 2000. United states standards, grades and weight classes for shell eggs. AMS 56.210, AMS, USDA, Washington, DC.

Haugh, R.R., 1937. The haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US. Egg Poult. Mag., 43: 552-573.

Colin, G.S., B. George and M.E. Ensminger, 2004. Poultry Science. 4th Edn., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Baiao, N.C., J. Mendez, J. Mateos, M. Garcia and G.G. Mateos, 1999. Pigmenting efficacy of several oxycarotenoids on egg yolk. J. Applied Poult. Res., 8: 472-479.

Hidalgo, A., M. Lucisano, E.M. Comelli and C. Pompei, 1996. Evolution of chemical and physical yolk characteristics during the storage of shell eggs. J. Agric. Food Chem., 44: 1447-1452.

Brake, J., T.J. Walsh, C.E. Jr. Benton, J.N. Petitte, R. Meijerhof and G. Penalva, 1997. Egg handling and storage. Poult. Sci., 76: 144-151.

Cavero, D., M. Schmutz, W. Icken and R. Preisinger, 2012. Attractive eggshell color as a breeding goal. Lohmann Inform., 47: 15-21.

Alsobayel, A.A. and M.A. Albadry, 2011. Effect of storage period and strain of layer on internal and external quality characteristics of eggs marketed in Riyadh area. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 10: 41-45.

Akyurek, H. and A.A. Okur, 2009. Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 1953-1958.

Arad, Z., U. Eylath, M. Ginsburg and H. Eyal-Giladi, 1989. Changes in uterine fluid composition and acid-base status during shell formation in the chicken. Am. J. Physiol., 257: R732-R737.

Voet, D. and J. Voet, 1990. Biocemistry. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Romanoff, A.L. and A.J. Romanoff, 1949. The Avian Egg. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Lokaewmanee , K. (2017). Storage Stability of Khaki Campbell Duck (Anas platyrhynchos Domesticus) Eggs at Room Temperature. International Journal of Poultry Science, 16(10), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.393.402