Comparative Study of Thigh Muscles and Bones Conformation and Some Carcass Traits of Local vs. Imported Turkey Strain


Authors

  • N.T. Taha Department of Animal Resources, College of Agriculture and Forestry, Mosul University, Mosul, Iraq
  • M.T. Farran Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences,American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.368.372

Keywords:

Drum-sticks bones, drum-sticks muscles, nazarian bones, Turkey strains

Abstract

Four males and four females of each of imported BUT-9 and local strain of turkey were slaughtered at marketing age, to study live body weight, som carcass traits, in addition to drumstick’s bones at Tibia region “Nazarian bones2” which radiography and chemically analyzed for fat-free bone parameters. The results indicated that BUT-9 revealed higher (p<0.05) live body weight, ready to cook carcass weight percent (dressing percent), breast weight and percent, left drum-stick weight and percent as compared with local strain of turkey. BUT-9 strain also significantly (p<0.05) had more number of drum-stick’s muscles, tibia weight and width, drum-stick’s thickness and width and drum-stick’s bones percent. However, local strain had significantly (p<0.05) more drumsticks bones “Nazarian bones” while BUT-9 had no Nazarian bones in their drum-stick’s muscles. Males had more (p<0.05) live body weight, neck, drum-stick’s width, length and tibia length, breast weight, width and depth and shank weight as a percent of live body weight. As compared with fibula there were no significant differences between those bones and fibula for dry matter, phosphorus and magnesium percents, while a significant (p<0.05) differences were noticed for ash and calcium. But fat percent didn’t show any significant differences between Nazarian bones themselves but were noticed with fibula. Sex had no significant effect on bone parameters except for males turkey bones which had more (p<0.05) dry matter than females.

References

AOAC., 1970. Official Methods of Analysis. 11th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA.

Barbour, G.W. and M.S. Lilburn, 1996. Comparative growth and development of Nicholas and hybrid toms from 16-82 days and effects of protein restriction from 0-59 days on growth on hybrid toms through 125 days of age. Poult. Sci., 75: 790-796.

Brenoe, U.T. and K. Kolstad, 2000. Body composition and development measured repeatedly by computer tomography during growth in two types of Turkeys. Poult. Sci., 79: 546-552.

Hahn, G. and M. Spindler, 2002. Method od dissection of turkey carcass. World Poult. Sci. J., 58: 179-197.

National Research Council, 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals: Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 8th Rev. Edn., Nattional Acadmic Science, Washington, DC.

Nestor, K.E., J.W. Anderson and S.G. Velleman, 2001. Genetic variation in pure lines and crossing of large-bodied turkey lines. 2-Carcass traits and body shape. Poult. Sci., 80: 1093-1104.

Taha, N.T., 2004. Study of drum-stick bones conformation between Iraqi local and imported breeds of turkey. Unpublished Data.

SAS Institute, 1992. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 5th Edn., SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

STU Keck Series, 2004. Wild Turkey No. 1. Fourth American Species Series.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Taha, N., & Farran, M. (2009). Comparative Study of Thigh Muscles and Bones Conformation and Some Carcass Traits of Local vs. Imported Turkey Strain. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8(4), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.368.372