Comparison of Three Different Vaccination Protocols Against Avian Infectious Anemia with One and Two Vaccines in Breeders and their Impact on Progeny
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2023.84.89Keywords:
Anemia, breeders, chicken anemia virus, progeny, vaccinationAbstract
Background and Objective: Avian Infectious Anemia is widely distributed around the world causing problems for both breeders and broilers. The transmission of this virus can be vertical or horizontal and is characterized by a clinical and subclinical presentation respectively. In order to prevent avian infectious anemia, specific titers are given to the breeder and then passed on to the chick. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of double vaccination in achieving higher and more uniform titers as well as decreasing the number of negative birds. Materials and Methods: The present study compared a traditional single-vaccine versus two other vaccination protocols using two doses in different combinations in three different flocks of Cobb×Cobb breeders. In this research serological evaluation was performed using the Idexx Avian Infectious Anemia Ab Test Laboratory kit. The breeder and the chick at birth was evaluated at different stages. Then they were compared utilizing various statistical methods according to the nature of the data. Results: Significant difference was found in the breeders at 20 weeks in favor of the protocols that used two doses and at 24 weeks in favor of the protocols that used one dose, however no difference was found in one-day-old chick. Conclusion: An additional vaccination against chicken anemia virus does not appear to be beneficial.
References
El-Bagoury, G.F., S.S. Abou-Dalal, S.K. Tolba and M.H. Khodeir, 2013. Comparative study on live attenuated and inactivated chicken anemia virus vaccines. Benha Vet. Med. J., 25: 46-54.
Vagnozzi, A.E., R. Espinosa, S. Cheng, D. Brinson, P. O’Kane, J. Wilson and G. Zavala, 2018. Study of dynamic of chicken infectious anaemia virus infection: which sample is more reliable for viral detection? Avian Pathol., 47: 489-496.
Mohamed, M.A., 2010. Chicken infectious anemia status in commercial broiler chickens flocks in assiut-upper Egypt: Occurrence, molecular analysis using PCR-RFLP and apoptosis effect on affected tissues. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 591-598.
Biarnés, M., 2008. Anemia Infecciosa Del Pollo. Proceeding of Jornadas Profesionales de Avicultura. Aranda de Duero, May 19-23, Selecciones Avícolas, 23-25.
Fatoba, A.J. and M.A. Adeleke, 2019. Chicken anemia virus: A deadly pathogen of poultry Acta Virol., 63: 19-25.
Tongkamsai, S., M.S. Lee, M.C. Cheng, H.C. Chaung, Y.L. Tsai and Y.Y. Lien, 2019. Persistent infection with chicken anemia virus in 3-week-old chickens induced by inoculation of the virus by the natural route. Pathogens, Vol. 8, No. 2.
Biarnes, M., A. Blanco, Q. Camprubi, N. Canals and R. Porta, 2009. Chicken Infectious Anemia in High Biosecurity Production System. Proceeding of 46th Symposium Científico de Avicultura, September 29-October 02, 147-150.
Urdaneta-Vargas, S.H., C.A. Narváez-Bravo, A.M. Arzalluz-Fischer, W. Mejía, A. Oviedo and E. García, 2007. Detection of antibody titers against Avian Infectious Anemia and its relationship with other immunosuppressive viruses in broiler chickens. Zulia state. Venezuela. Rev. Científica, Vol. 7.
Schat, K. and V. van Santen, 2020. Chicken Infectious Anemia Virus and Other Circovirus Infections. In: Chicken Infectious Anemia Virus and Other Circovirus Infections. Swayne, D.E. (Ed.). Wiley pp: 422-430.
Todd, D., 2000. Circoviruses: Immunosuppressive threats to avian species: A review. Avian Pathol., 29: 373-394.
McNulty, M.S., 1991. Chicken anaemia agent: A review. Avian Pathol., 20: 187-203.
Dhama, K., M. Mahendran, R. Somvanshi and M.M. Chawak, 2008. Chicken infectious anaemia virus: An immunosuppressive pathogen of poultry-A review. Indian J. Vet. Pathol., 32: 158-167.
Zavala, G., 2009. Chicken Anemia and Other Immunosupresive Diseases. Proceeding of 46th Symposium Científico de Avicultura, September 29-October 02, 115-120.
Lind, D., W. Marchal and S. Wathen, 2015. Estadística Aplicada A Los Negocios Y La Economía. 15th McGraw Hill, Page: 889.
Malo, A., 1995. Determinatin of the minimum protective neutralizing antibody titer to CAV in adult chickens. Intervet VSD Newsl., 11: 1-5.
Smyth, J. and K. Schat., 2013. Virus-induced Immunosuppression: Chicken Infectious Anemia. In: Immunosuppressive Diseases of Poultry, Gimeno, I.M.P., (Ed.). 978-84-941389-5-9 pp: 93.
Díaz, F.J.T., S.T. Peña, C.G. Martínez, R. Hauck and T.van den Berg, 2013. Vaccination in Poultry. 1st Edn., Editorial Servet, Page: 208.
Moeini, H., A.R. Omar, R.A. Rahim and K. Yusoff, 2011. Improving the potency of DNA vaccine against chicken anemia virus (CAV) by fusing VP1 protein of CAV to Marek's Disease Virus (MDV) Type-1 VP22 protein. Virol. J., Vol. 8.
Schwefer, S., M. Castells and U. Löhren, 2012. Determinación de la respuesta inmunológica después de la vacunación con vacunas de anemia infecciosa del pollo con diferente grado de atenuación. Lohmann Animal Health. https://www.wpsa-aeca.es/aeca_imgs_docs/_cav_diferente_grado_de_atenuacion.pdf
Baraibar, J.A., 2006. Algunos conceptos sobre vacunas bacterianas y virales. Veterinaria, (In Spanish) 41: 35-42.
Chansiripornchai, N., 2017. Field study of seroconversion of three different commercial vaccines of chicken infectious anemia virus in Thailand. Thai J. Vet. Med., 46: 699-704.
Allam, T., N. Salah and S. Elballal, 2015. Clinicopathological studies on chicken infectious anemia disease live virus vaccines. J. Curr. Vet. Res., 9: 40-57.
Birhane, N. and Fesseha, H., 2021. Vaccine failure in poultry production and its control methods: A review. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 29: 22588-22596.
Coakley, C.M., V. Staszewski, K.A. Herborn, E.J. Cunningham, 2014. Factors affecting the levels of protection transferred from mother to offspring following immune challenge. Front Zool. Vol. 11.
Munoz, R., 2003. Use of a Chicken Anemia Virus Antibody Test for Monitoring Protective Antibody Titers. In: Proceedings of the Fifty-Second Western Poultry Disease Conference. Square, K. (Ed.). Sacramento California Page: 119.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
