Effects of Megasphaera elsdenii on Growth Performance and Characteristics of Cecal Digesta in Broiler Chickens


Authors

  • C.M. Bowhay Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600, USA
  • J.S. Drouillard Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600, USA
  • J.M. Lattimer Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.321.329

Keywords:

<i>Megasphaera elsdenii</i>, acidifier, direct fed microbial, poultry feed, probiotic

Abstract

Objective: A study was conducted to evaluate effects of Megasphaera elsdenii supplementation on growth performance and characteristics of cecal digesta in broiler chickens. Materials and Method: Day-old male Cobb 500 broiler chicks (n = 2520) were separated into 72 pens of 35. Pens were blocked by location within the barn and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments. Treatment 1 consisted of a 0.2 mL oral gavage of M. elsdenii culture. Treatment 2 was an aerosolized mist of M. elsdenii culture, applied to the body surface at a rate of approximately 1.7 mL/bird. Cultures contained 1.97×109 CFU mL-1 of M. elsdenii. Treatment 3 served as a negative control. Feed intake and pen weight were collected at each feed change (day 16, 30 and 36). Results: At day 36, carcass data were collected from 5 birds/pen. Growth, carcass weight and mortality rate were unaffected by treatment (p>0.10). Cecal pH and volatile fatty acid concentrations were evaluated weekly. Cecal pH was lower in treated birds than control (p<0.01). Cecal contents of orally gavaged birds contained greater volatile fatty acid concentrations than control birds on day 14 (p<0.01). No differences in cecal profiles were observed across treatments after day 21 (p>0.30). Megasphaera elsdenii supplementation appeared to have the greatest effect on cecal characteristics between day 14 and 21 following administration, after which no further response is detected. Conclusion: Decreased cecal pH observed in treated birds suggests potential for use as an acidifier, a commonly incorporated antibiotic alternative in poultry production.

References

Dibner, J.J. and J.D. Richards, 2005. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poult. Sci., 84: 634-643.

Animal Drugs and Animal Food Additives, 2015. Development & Approval Process. U.S. Food & Drug Administration,

Yirga, H., Vol. 3, No. 2 2015. The use of probiotics in animal nutrition. J. Probiotics Health.

Bedford, M., 2000. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: Implications and strategies to minimise subsequent problems. World's Poult. Sci. J., 56: 347-365.

Hruby, M. and A.J. Cowieson, 2006. The Role of Enzymes and Betaine in Antibiotic Growth Promoter Free Nutrition. In: Antimicrobial Growth Promoters: Where Do We Go From Here? Barug, D., J. de Long, A.K. Kies and M.W.A. Verstegen (Eds.). Wageningen Acad. Publ., Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp: 269-287.

Landers, T.F., B. Cohen, T.E. Wittum and E.L. Larson, 2012. A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy and potential. Public Health Rep., 127: 4-22.

Chaucheyras-Durand, F. and H. Durand, 2010. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Beneficial Microbes, 1: 3-9.

Patterson, J.A. and K.M. Burkholder, 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci., 82: 627-631.

Angel, R., R.A. Dalloul and J. Doerr, 2005. Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial. Poult. Sci., 84: 1222-1231.

Nava, G.M., L.R. Bielke, T.R. Callaway and M. Castaneda, 2005. Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal infections: The poultry experience. Anim. Health Res. Rev., 6: 105-118.

La Ragione, R.M. and M.J. Woodward, 2003. Competitive exclusion by Bacillus subtilis spores of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Clostridium perfringens in young chickens. Vet. Microbiol., 94: 245-256.

Higgins, J.P., S.E. Higgins, J.L. Vicente, A.D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez and B.M. Hargis, 2007. Temporal effects of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture on salmonella in neonatal broilers. Poult. Sci., 86: 1662-1666.

Higgins, S.E., G.F. Erf, J.P. Higgins, S.N. Henderson, A.D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez and B.M. Hargis, 2007. Effect of probiotic treatment in broiler chicks on intestinal macrophage numbers and phagocytosis of Salmonella enteritidis by abdominal exudate cells. Poult. Sci., 86: 2315-2321.

Sen, S., S.L. Ingale, Y.W. Kim, J.S. Kim and K.H. Kim et al., 2012. Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology. Res. Vet. Sci., 93: 264-268.

Ghadban, G.S., 2002. Probiotics in broiler production-a review. Arch. Geflugelk., 66: 49-58.

Pascual, M., M. Hugas, J.I. Badiola, J.M. Monfort and M. Garriga, 1999. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 65: 4981-4986.

Mountzouris, K.C., P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros, 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult. Sci., 86: 309-317.

Corrier, D.E., A.G. Hollister, D.J. Nisbet, C.M. Scanlan, R.C. Beier and J.R. DeLoach, 1994. Competitive exclusion of Salmonella enteritidis in leghorn chicks: comparison of treatment by crop gavage, drinking water, spray, or lyophilized alginate beads. Avian Dis., 38: 297-303.

Hashizume, K., T. Tsukahara, K. Yamada, H. Koyama and K. Ushida, 2003. Megasphaera elsdenii JCM1772T normalizes hyperlactate production in the large intestine of fructooligosaccharide-fed rats by stimulating butyrate production. J. Nutr., 133: 3187-3190.

Tsukahara, T., K. Hashizume, H. Koyama and K. Ushida, 2006. Stimulation of butyrate production through the metabolic interaction among lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and lactic acid‐utilizing bacteria, Megasphaera elsdenii, in porcine cecal digesta. Am. Sci. J., 77: 454-461.

Scupham, A.J., T.G. Patton, E. Bent and D.O. Bayles, 2008. Comparison of the cecal microbiota of domestic and wild Turkeys. Microb. Ecol., 56: 322-331.

Counotte, G.H., R.A. Prins, R.H. Janssen and M.J. Debie, 1981. Role of megasphaera elsdenii in the fermentation of dl-[2-C]lactate in the rumen of dairy cattle. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 42: 649-655.

SAS., 2014. SAS user’s guide, statistical. Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Timmerman, H.M., A. Veldman, E. van den Elsen, F.M. Rombouts and A.C. Beynen, 2006. Mortality and growth performance of broilers given drinking water supplemented with chicken-specific probiotics. Poult. Sci., 85: 1383-1388.

Nayebpor, M., P. Farhomand and A. Hashemi, 2007. Effects of different levels of direct fed microbial (Primalac) on growth performance and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6: 1308-1313.

Awad, W.A., K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem and J. Bohm, 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 88: 49-56.

Sakata, T., 1986. Effects of indigestible dietary bulk and short chain fatty acids on the tissue weight and epithelial cell proliferation rate of the digestive tract in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminology, 32: 355-362.

Le Blay, G., C. Michel, H.M. Blottiere and C. Cherbut, 1999. Prolonged intake of fructo-oligosaccharides induces a short-term elevation of lactic acid producing bacteria and a persistent increase in cecal butyrate in rats. J. Nutr., 129: 2231-2235.

Daly, K., C.S. Stewart, H.J. Flint and S.P. Shirazi-Beechey, 2001. Bacterial diversity within the equine large intestine as revealed by molecular analysis of cloned 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 38: 141-151.

Yoshida, Y., T. Tsukahara and K. Ushida, 2009. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum Lq80 and Megasphaera elsdenii iNP‐001 induces efficient recovery from mucosal atrophy in the small and the large intestines of weaning piglets. Anim. Sci. J., 80: 709-715.

Ricke, S.C., 2003. Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials. Poult. Sci., 82: 632-639.

P.W. O'Toole and J.C. Cooney, 2008. Probiotic bacteria influence the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis., Vol. 2008.

McHan, F. and E.B. Shotts, 1992. Effect of feeding selected short-chain fatty acids on the in vivo attachment of Salmonella typhimurium in chick ceca. Avian Dis., 36: 139-142.

Thompson, J.L. and M. Hinton, 1997. Antibacterial activity of formic and propionic acids in the diet of hens on Salmonellas in the crop. Br. Poult. Sci., 38: 59-65.

Van Immerseel, F., F. Boyen, I. Gantois, L. Timbermont and L. Bohez et al., 2005. Supplementation of coated butyric acid in the feed reduces colonization and shedding of Salmonella in poultry. Poult. Sci., 84: 1851-1856.

Xu, Y.M., G.R. Pearson and M. Hinton, 1988. The colonization of the alimentary tract and visceral organs of chicks with salmonellas following challenge via the feed: Bacteriological findings. Br. Vet. J., 144: 403-410.

Hume, M.E., D.E. Corrier, F.W. Ivie and J.R. DeLoach, 1993. Metabolism of [14C] propionic acid in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 72: 786-793.

Marounek, M., K. Fliegrova and S. Bartos, 1989. Metabolism and some characteristics of ruminal strains of Megasphaera elsdenii. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 55: 1570-1573.

Slyter, L.L., R.S. Tung, and L.K. Kung, 1992. Effect of monensin and lysocellin on growth and fermentation by pure cultures of ruminal bacteria. J. Applied Anim. Res., Vol. 1.

Prabhu, R., E. Altman and M.A. Eiteman, 2012. Lactate and acrylate metabolism by Megasphaera elsdenii under batch and steady-state conditions. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 78: 8564-8570.

Miura, H., M. Horiguchi and T. Matsumoto, 1980. Nutritional interdependence among rumen bacteria, bacteroides amylophilus, Megasphaera elsdenii, and ruminococcus albus. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 40: 294-300.

Shetty, S.A., N.P. Marathe, V. Lanjekar, D. Ranade and Y.S. Shouche, 2013. Comparative genome analysis of Megasphaera sp. reveals niche specialization and its potential role in the human gut. PLos ONE.

Hino, T. and S. Kuroda, 1993. Presence of lactate dehydrogenase and lactate racemase in Megasphaera elsdenii grown on glucose or lactate. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 59: 255-259.

Long, M., W.J. Feng, P. Li, Y. Zhang and R.X. He et al., 2014. Effects of the acid-tolerant engineered bacterial strain Megasphaera elsdenii H6F32 on ruminal pH and the lactic acid concentration of simulated rumen acidosis in vitro. Res. Vet. Sci., 96: 28-29.

Forsberg, C.W., 1978. Nutritional characteristics of Megasphaera elsdenii. Can. J. Microbiol., 24: 981-985.

Van Immerseel, F., J. de Buck, F. Boyen, L. Bohez and F. Pasmans et al., 2004. Medium-chain fatty acids decrease colonization and invasion through hilA suppression shortly after infection of chickens with Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 70 : 3582-3587.

Diebold, G. and U. Eidelsburger, 2006. Acidification of Diets as an Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoters. In: Antimicrobial Growth Promoters: Where Do We Go From Here? Barug, D., J. de Long, A.K. Kies and M.W.A. Verstegen (Eds.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp: 311-327.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Bowhay, C., Drouillard, J., & Lattimer , J. (2020). Effects of Megasphaera elsdenii on Growth Performance and Characteristics of Cecal Digesta in Broiler Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 19(7), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.321.329

Most read articles by the same author(s)