Betel Nut Husks as An Alternative Litter Materials for Broiler Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.81.85Abstract
Background and Objective: The availability of rice hulls has become infrequent due to competition and the development of residual rice byproducts; therefore, it has forced farmers to seek alternative litter materials. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of using betel nut husks compared to rice hulls or dried leaves as litter material for broiler production on productive performance, carcass traits and internal organ characteristics. Materials and Methods: A total of 270 unsexed one-day-old broiler chicks (Lohmann) were included the study; a completely randomized design including three treatments with six replicates consisting of 15 chicks each was applied. The treatments comprised betel nut husks, rice hulls and dried leaves as litter materials. Standard feeding and management practices were followed during the experimental period. The body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly and the body weight gain and feed conversion ratio were calculated. Two broilers from each pen were used to measure the carcass traits, abdominal fat pad quantity and internal organ weight at 35 day of age. Results: The results from the present study showed that the litter materials did not affect (p>0.05) body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratios during the experimental period. The carcass yield and abdominal fat quantity were not influenced (p>0.05) by the litter material. There was no difference (p>0.05) among the three litter materials in the internal organ weight; however, the gizzard weight was higher (p<0.05) in the broilers reared on rice hulls than in those reared on dried leaves and betel nut husks. Conclusion: Betel nut husks can be used as an alternative litter material for broiler production without sacrificing the performance of broiler chickens.
References
Shepherd, E.M. and B.D. Fairchild, 2010. Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult. Sci., 89: 2043-2051.
Collett, S.R., 2012. Nutrition and wet litter problems in poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 173: 65-75.
Garcia, R.G., I.C.L.A. Paz, F.R. Caldara, I.A. Naas, D.F Pereira and V.M.O.S. Ferreira, 2012. Selecting the most adequate bedding material for broiler production in Brazil. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 121-127.
Robins, A. and C.J.C. Phillips, 2011. International approaches to the welfare of meat chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 67: 351-369.
Olivier, P.A., 2004. The Rice Hull House. http://naturalhomes.org/img/ricehullhouse.pdf
Grimes, J.L., T.A. Carter and J.L. Godwin, 2006. Use of a litter material made from cotton waste, gypsum and old newsprint for rearing broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 85: 563-568.
Farhadi, D., 2014. Short communication: Evaluation of the physical and chemical properties of some agricultural wastes as poultry litter material. Global J. Anim. Sci. Res., 2: 270-276.
Hassan, M.M., M.H. Wagner, H.U. Zaman and M.A. Khan, 2010. Physico-mechanical performance of hybrid betel nut (Areca catechu) short fiber/seaweed polypropylene composite. J. Nat. Fibers, 7: 165-177.
Yusriah, L., S.M. Sapuan, E.S. Zainudin and M. Mariatti, 2012. Exploring the potential of betel nut husk fiber as reinforcement in polymer composites: Effect of fiber maturity. Procedia Chem., 4: 87-94.
Willis, W.L., C. Murray and C. Talbott, 1997. Evaluation of leaves as a litter material. Poult. Sci., 76: 1138-1140.
SAS., 2001. SAS/STAT User’s Guide for Personal Computers, Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Garces, A.P.J.T., S.M.S. Afonso, A. Chilundo and C.T.S. Jairoce, 2017. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 49: 369-374.
Rahul, S., B.D. Singh, Y.D. Chander, S.S. Singh and M.A. Kumar, 2017. Effect of different litter materials on the performance of broiler chicken. J. Anim. Res., 7: 665-671.
Khan, A.A., G.A. Bhat and M.T. Banday, 2007. Alternate litter materials for broiler rearing. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 42: 326-327.
Sharnam, K.S., K.N. Wadhwani, K. Khanna and A.M. Patel, 2008. Effect of quality feeds and litter materials on broiler performance under hot humid climate. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 14-22.
Huang, Y., J.S. Yoo, H.J. Kim, Y. Wang, Y.J. Chen, J.H. Cho and I.H. Kim, 2009. Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 18: 1-7.
Onu, P.N., F.N. Madubuike, P.E. Nwakpu and A.I. Anyaehie, 2011. Performance and carcass characteristics of broilers raised on three different litter materials. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am., 2: 1347-1350.
Toghyani, M., A. Gheisari, M. Modaresi, S.A. Tabeidian and M. Toghyani, 2010. Effect of different litter material on performance and behavior of broiler chickens. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 122: 48-52.
Thirumalesh, T., A.K. Guggari, B.K. Ramesh and B.N. Suresh, 2013. Effect of different crop residues as litter material on performance of commercial broilers. Indian J. Anim. Res., 47: 23-28.
Sharma, G., A. Khan, S. Singh and A.K. Anand, 2015. Efficacy of pine leaves as an alternative bedding material for broiler chicks during summer season. Vet. World, 8: 1219-1224.
Al-Homidan, I., M.M. Fathi and A. Al-Shumaymiri, 2018. Chopped palm leaves as an acceptable bedding material for broiler production. J. Applied Poult. Res., 27: 59-64.
Atencio, J.L., J.A. Fernandez, A.G. Gernat and J.G. Murillo, 2010. Effect of pine wood shavings, rice hulls and river bed sand on broiler productivity when used as a litter sources. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 240-243.
Vargas-Galicia, A.J., E. Sosa-Montes, L.T. Rodríguez-Ortega, A. Pro-Martinez and C.A. Ruiz-Feria et al., 2017. Effect of litter material and stocking density on bone and tendon strength, and productive performance in broilers. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 97: 673-682.
Kheravii, S.K., R.A. Swick, M. Choct and S.B. Wu, 2017. Potential of pelleted wheat straw as an alternative bedding material for broilers. Poult. Sci., 96: 1641-1647.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
