Review
Open Access
Effect of Direct-fed Microbials on Intestinal Villus Height in Broiler Chickens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall effect of direct-fed microbials (DFM) or probiotics on intestinal villus height in broiler chickens. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were collected by searching PubMed, SCOPUS, Poultry Science Journal and Google Scholar. Studies of randomized or non-randomized controlled trials were included using DFM in broiler chickens and reporting intestinal villus height (VH) (the primary outcome), crypt depth (CD) or villus height-to-crypt depth (VH/CD) ratio. The overall effect on intestinal VH, CD or VH/CD was evaluated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis for the VH was planned a priori for 6 characteristics (broiler breed, sex, DFM product, microbial species, duration of treatment and application route). In addition, study quality (using SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool) and publication bias were evaluated. Results: A total of 25 studies were identified (with a total of 296 comparisons) that met the inclusion criteria. Supplementation of DFM for broiler chickens was associated with increased VH in the small intestine (SMD = 3.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.69, 4.06), p<0.001, I2 = 92, n = 113 comparisons) and with greater VH/CD ratio in the small intestine (SMD = 2.73, 95% CI (2.09, 3.36, p<0.001, I2 = 91, n = 87 comparisons). In subgroup analysis for the VH, significant differences among subgroups were found in 5 characteristics (broiler breed, DFM product, microbial species, duration of treatment and application route). Most studies were presented with unclear risk of bias. Publication bias was also observed. Conclusion: Supplementation with DFM for broiler chickens was associated with increased intestinal villus height.
Keywords:
Broiler chickens, direct-fed microbials, meta-analysis, probiotics, systematic review, villus heightGeographical Article Usage
Article Metrics
297
Abstract Views
219
File Views
0
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article Citation Metrics
How to Cite
Heak, C., Sukon , P., Kongpechr, S., Tengjaroenkul, B., & Chuachan, K. (2017). Effect of Direct-fed Microbials on Intestinal Villus Height in Broiler Chickens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. International Journal of Poultry Science, 16(10), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.403.414
References
1.
Hong, H.A., L.H. Duc and S.M. Cutting, 2005. The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 29: 813-835.
2.
Bernardeau, M. and J.P. Vernoux, 2013. Overview of differences between microbial feed additives and probiotics for food regarding regulation, growth promotion effects and health properties and consequences for extrapolation of farm animal results to humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 19: 321-330.
3.
Bermudez-Brito, M., J. Plaza-Diaz, S. Munoz-Quezada, C. Gomez-Llorente and A. Gil, 2012. Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 61: 160-174.
4.
Buntyn, J.O., T.B. Schmidt, D.J. Nisbet and T.R. Callaway, 2016. The role of direct-fed microbials in conventional livestock production. Ann. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 4: 335-355.
5.
Uni, Z., A. Geyra, H. Ben-Hur and D. Sklan, 2000. Small intestinal development in the young chick: Crypt formation and enterocyte proliferation and migration. Br. Poult. Sci., 41: 544-551.
6.
Geyra, A., Z. Uni and D. Sklan, 2001. Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the posthatch chick. Poult. Sci., 80: 776-782.
7.
Sen, S., S.L. Ingale, Y.W. Kim, J.S. Kim and K.H. Kim et al., 2012. Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology. Res. Vet. Sci., 93: 264-268.
8.
Ariyadi, B. and S. Harimurti, 2015. Effect of indigenous probiotics lactic acid bacteria on the small intestinal histology structure and the expression of mucins in the ileum of broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 276-278.
9.
Loh, T.C., N.T. Thanh, H.L. Foo, M. Hair-Beo and B.K. Azhar, 2010. Feeding of different levels of metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, fecal microflora, volatile fatty acids and villi height in broilers. Anim. Sci. J., 81: 205-214.
10.
Kim, J.S., S.L. Ingale, Y.W. Kim, K.H. Kim and S. Sen et al., 2012. Effect of supplementation of multi‐microbe probiotic product on growth performance, apparent digestibility, cecal microbiota and small intestinal morphology of broilers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 96: 618-626.
11.
Giannenas, I., E. Tsalie, E. Triantafillou, S. Hessenberger, K. Teichmann, M. Mohnl and D. Tontis, 2014. Assessment of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella. Avian Pathol., 43: 209-216.
12.
Shargh, M.S., B. Dastar, S. Zerehdaran, M. Khomeiri and A. Moradi, 2012. Effects of using plant extracts and a probiotic on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora population in broilers. J. Applied Poult. Res., 21: 201-208.
13.
Wang, X., Y.Z. Farnell, E.D. Peebles, A.S. Kiess, K.G.S. Wamsley and W. Zhai, 2016. Effects of prebiotics, probiotics and their combination on growth performance, small intestine morphology and resident Lactobacillus of male broilers. Poult. Sci., 95: 1332-1340.
14.
Hooijmans, C.R., M.M. Rovers, R.B. de Vries, M. Leenaars, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga and M.W. Langendam, 2014. SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., Vol. 14.
15.
Hooijmans, C.R., J. IntHout, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga and M.M. Rovers, 2014. Meta-analyses of animal studies: An introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare. ILAR J., 55: 418-426.
16.
Higgins, J.P., S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks and D.G. Altman, 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J., 327: 557-560.
17.
Hooijmans, C.R., R.B. de Vries, M.M. Rovers, H.G. Gooszen and M. Ritskes-Hoitinga, 2012. The effects of probiotic supplementation on experimental acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One, Vol. 7.
18.
Egger, M., S.G. Davey, M. Schneider and C. Mider, 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J., 315: 629-634.
19.
Zhang, A.W., B.D. Lee, S.K. Lee, K.W. Lee, G.H. An, K.B. Song and C.H. Lee, 2005. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. J. Poult. Sci., 84: 1015-1021.
20.
Onderci, M., N. Sahin, K. Sahin, G. Cikim, A. Aydín, I. Ozercan and S. Aydín, 2006. Efficacy of supplementation of α-amylase-producing bacterial culture on the performance, nutrient use, and gut morphology of broiler chickens fed a corn-based diet. Poult. Sci., 85: 505-510.
21.
Chichlowski, M., W.J. Croom, F.W. Edens, B.W. McBride and R. Qiu et al., 2007. Microarchitecture and spatial relationship between bacteria and ileal, cecal and colonic epithelium in chicks fed a direct-fed microbial, PrimaLac and salinomycin. Poult. Sci., 86: 1121-1132.
22.
Liu, J.R., S.F. Lai and B. Yu, 2007. Evaluation of an intestinal Lactobacillus reuteri strain expressing rumen fungal xylanase as a probiotic for broiler chickens fed on a wheat-based diet. Br. Poult. Sci., 48: 507-514.
23.
Samli, H.E., N. Senkoylu, F. Koc, M. Kanter and A. Agma, 2007. Effects of Enterococcus faecium and dried whey on broiler performance, gut histomorphology and intestinal microbiota. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 61: 42-49.
24.
Awad, W.A., K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem and J. Bohm, 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 88: 49-56.
25.
Marković, R., D. Šefer, M. Krstić and B. Petrujkić, 2009. Effect of different growth promoters on broiler performance and gut morphology. Arch. Med. Vet., 41: 163-169.
26.
Awad, W.A., K. Ghareeb and J. Bohm, 2010. Effect of addition of a probiotic micro-organism to broiler diet on intestinal mucosal architecture and electrophysiological parameters. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 94: 486-494.
27.
Lee, K.W., S.H. Lee, H.S. Lillehoj, G.X. Li and S.I. Jang et al., 2010. Effects of direct-fed microbials on growth performance, gut morphometry and immune characteristics in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 89: 203-216.
28.
Taheri, H.R., H. Moravej, A. Malakzadegan, F. Tabandeh, M. Zaghari, M. Shivazad and M. Adibmoradi, 2010. Efficacy of Pediococcus acidlactici-based probiotic on intestinal coliforms and villus height, serum cholesterol level and performance of broiler chickens. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 9: 7564-7567.
29.
Taheri, H.R., H. Moravej, F. Tabandeh, M. Zaghari and M. Shivazad, 2010. Efficacy of combined or single use of Lactobacillus crispatus LT116 and L. johnsonii LT171 on broiler performance. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 580-585.
30.
Ghosh, T.K., S. Haldar, M.R. Bedford, N. Muthusami and I. Samanta, 2012. Assessment of yeast cell wall as replacements for antibiotic growth promoters in broiler diets: Effects on performance, intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune responses. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 96: 275-284.
31.
Sharifi, S.D., A. Dibamehr, H. Lotfollahian and B. Baurhoo, 2012. Effects of flavomycin and probiotic supplementation to diets containing different sources of fat on growth performance, intestinal morphology, apparent metabolizable energy and fat digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 91: 918-927.
32.
Tsirtsikos, P., K. Fegeros, C. Balaskas, A. Kominakis and K.C. Mountzouris, 2012. Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology in broilers. Poult. Sci., 91: 1860-1868.
33.
Afsharmanesh, M., B. Sadaghi and F.G. Silversides, 2013. Influence of supplementation of prebiotic, probiotic and antibiotic to wet-fed wheat-based diets on growth, ileal nutrient digestibility, blood parameters and gastrointestinal characteristics of broiler chickens. Comparat. Clin. Pathol., 22: 245-251.
34.
Salim, H.M., H.K. Kang, N. Akter, D.W. Kim and J.H. Kim et al., 2013. Supplementation of Direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 92: 2084-2090.
35.
Afsharmanesh, M. and B. Sadaghi, 2014. Effects of dietary alternatives (probiotic, green tea powder, and Kombucha tea) as antimicrobial growth promoters on growth, ileal nutrient digestibility, blood parameters and immune response of broiler chickens. Comparat. Clin. Pathol., 23: 717-724.
36.
Abudabos, A.M., H.A. Al-Batshan and M.A. Murshed, 2015. Effects of prebiotics and probiotics on the performance and bacterial colonization of broiler chickens. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 45: 419-428.
37.
Agboola, A.F., B.R.O. Omidiwura, O. Odu, I.O. Popoola and E.A. Iyayi, 2015. Effects of organic acid and probiotic on performance and gut morphology in broiler chickens. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 45: 494-501.
38.
Beski, S.S.M. and S.Y.T. Al-Sardary, 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic and synbiotic on broiler chickens hematology and intestinal integrity. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 31-36.
39.
Lei, X., X. Piao, Y. Ru, H. Zhang, A. Peron and H. Zhang, 2015. Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-based direct-fed microbial on performance, nutrient utilization, intestinal morphology and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 239-246.
40.
Xing, Y., S. Wang, J. Fan, A.O. Oso and S.W. Kim et al., 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation with lysine-yielding on gut morphology, cecal microflora and intestinal immune response of Linwu ducks. J. Anim. Sci., 93: 3449-3457.
41.
Kamollerd, C., P. Surachon, P. Maunglai, W. Siripornadulsil and P. Sukon, 2016. Assessment of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus reuteri MD5-2 isolated from ceca of Muscovy ducks. Korean J. Vet. Res., 56: 1-7.
42.
Lee, S.H., S.L. Ingale, J.S. Kim, K.H. Kim and A. Lokhande et al., 2014. Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 fermentation biomass on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota and intestinal morphology of weanling pig. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 188: 102-110.
43.
Dowarah, R., A.K. Verma, N. Agarwal, B.H.M. Patel and P. Singh, 2017. Effect of swine based probiotic on performance, diarrhoea scores, intestinal microbiota and gut health of grower-finisher crossbred pigs. Livest. Sci., 195: 74-79.
44.
Shamoto, K. and K. Yamauchi, 2000. Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different refeeding procedures. Poult. Sci., 79: 718-723.
45.
Paul, S.K., G. Halder, M.K. Mondal and G. Samanta, 2007. Effect of organic acid salt on the performance and gut health of broiler chicken. J. Poult. Sci., 44: 389-395.
46.
Cho, J.H., P.Y. Zhao and I.H. Kim, 2011. Probiotics as a dietary additive for pigs: A review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10: 2127-2134.
47.
Kamada, N., G.Y. Chen, N. Inohara and G. Nunez, 2013. Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nature Immunol., 14: 685-690.
48.
Sartor, R.B., 2006. Mechanisms of disease: Pathogenesis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 3: 390-407.
49.
Rolfe, R.D., 2000. The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. J. Nutr., 130: 396S-402S.
50.
Deng, W., X.F. Dong, J.M. Tong and Q. Zhang, 2012. The probiotic Bacillus licheniformis ameliorates heat stress-induced impairment of egg production, gut morphology and intestinal mucosal immunity in laying hens. Poult. Sci., 91: 575-582.
51.
Pluske, J.R., M.J. Tompson, C.S. Atwood, P.H. Bird, I.H. Williams and P.E. Hartmann, 1996. Maintenance of villus height and crypt depth and enhancement of disaccharide digestion and monosaccharide absorption, in piglets fed on cows' whole milk after weaning. Br. J. Nutr., 76: 409-422.
52.
Montagne, L., J.R. Pluske and D.J. Hampson, 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 108: 95-117.
53.
Xu, Z.R., C.H. Hu, M.S. Xia, X.A. Zhan and M.Q. Wang, 2003. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult. Sci., 82: 1030-1036.
54.
Borenstein, M., L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins and H.R. Rothstein, 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England, pp: 421.
55.
Li, J., P.Y. Hernanda, W.M. Bramer, M.P. Peppelenbosch, J. van Luijk and Q. Pan, 2015. Anti-tumor effects of metformin in animal models of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLos One, Vol. 10.
56.
Wever, K.E., M.H. Bruintjes, M.C. Warle and C.R. Hooijmans, 2016. Renal perfusion and function during pneumoperitoneum: A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. studies. Plos One, Vol. 11.
57.
Begg, C., M. Cho, S. Eastwood, R. Horton and D. Moher et al., 1996. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 276: 637-639.
58.
Moher, D., K.F. Schulz, D.G. Altman and L. Lepage, 2001. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357: 1191-1194.
59.
Moher, D., S. Hopewell, K.F. Schulz, V. Montori and P.C. Gotzsche et al., 2010. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br. Med. J., Vol. 340.
60.
O'Connor, A.M., J.M. Sargeant, I.A. Gardner, J.S. Dickson and M.E. Torrence et al., 2010. The REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. Prev. Vet. Med., 93: 11-18.
61.
Kilkenny, C., W.J. Browne, I.C. Cuthill, M. Emerson and D.G. Altman, 2010. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol., Vol. 8.
