Nucleotide Sequence Variation in MHC Class I Region in Guinea Fowl


Authors

  • S.K. Singh Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • S. Mehra Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • S.K. Shukla Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • Vinay Kumar Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • A. Tiwari Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • M. Mehra Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • Giriraj Goyal Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
  • Jose Mathew Department of Biotechnology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, India
  • Deepak Sharma Genome Mapping Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.236.239

Keywords:

Guinea fowl, MHC I, nucleotide variability, phylogeny

Abstract

The MHC class I gene was amplified, cloned and sequenced in guinea fowl using the primers specific to BF2 gene in chicken. The nucleotide sequence of 571 bp partial CDS of BF2 gene includes 32 nucleotides of signal peptide (exon 1), complete α1 domain (270 nucleotides) and 269 nucleotides of α2 domain. For α1 and α domain no sequence variation was observed within guinea fowl sequences, however, high variability was observed within the other poultry species (15.93-28.03%) except chicken (7.95-9.16%). Between the guinea fowl and other poultry species, the α1 domain showed high nucleotide variability (29.26-43.70%). Among poultry species, guinea fowl showed least variability with chicken and maximum with duck. Among the substitutions, majorities were of non-synonymous (76.27%) with a ration of 1:3 between synonymous to non-synonymous substitutions. Guinea fowl showed lower genetic distances (Kimura 2-parameter) with chicken and quail (0.211-0.215), while with duck and goose, it showed higher genetic distances (0.343-0.350). Phylogenetic tree, based these genetic distances revealed two major clusters, comprising of guinea fowl, quail and chicken in one with guinea fowl as separate branch, while duck and goose in other.

References

Lima-Rosa, C.A.V., C.W. Canal, A.F. Streck, L.B. Freitas, A. Delgado-Canedo, S.L. Bonatto and S. Salzano, 2004. B-F DNA sequence variability in Brazilian (blue egg Caipira) chicken. Anim. Genet., 35: 278-284.

Livant, E.J., J. Brigati and S.J. Ewald, 2004. Diversity and locus specificity of chicken MHC B class I sequences. Anim. Genet., 35: 18-27.

Moon, D.A., S.M. Veniamin, J.A. Parks-Dely and K.F. Magor, 2005. The MHC of the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) contains five differentially expressed class I genes. J. Immunol., 175: 6702-6712.

Muchadeyi, F.C., S. Sibanda, N.T. Kusina, J. Kusina and S. Makuza, 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., 16: 12-20.

Shiina, T., A. Oka, T. Imanishi, K. Hanzawa, T. Gojobori, S. Watanabe and H. Inoko, 1999. Multiple class I loci expressed by the quail MHC. Immunogenetics, 49: 456-460.

Xia, C., C.Y. Lin, G.X. Xu, T.J. Hu and T.Y. Yang, 2004. cDNA cloning and genomic structure of the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) MHC class I gene. Immunogenetics, 56: 304-309.

Xia, C., T. Hu, T. Yang, L. Wang, G. Xu and C. Lin, 2005. cDNA cloning, genomic structure and expression analysis of the goose (Anser cygnoides) MHC class I gene. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 107: 291-302.

Yan, R.Q., X.S. Li, T.Y. Yang and C. Xia, 2005. Characterization of BF2 and B2m in three Chinese chicken lines. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 108: 417-425.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Singh, S., Mehra, S., Shukla, S., Kumar, V., Tiwari, A., Mehra, M., Goyal, G., Mathew, J., & Sharma, D. (2010). Nucleotide Sequence Variation in MHC Class I Region in Guinea Fowl. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(3), 236–239. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.236.239

Most read articles by the same author(s)