Effects of Urea-Treated Fermented Orange Peel Meal Fermentation Duration on Meat Organoleptic Properties and Apparent Nutrient Digestibility in Broiler Chickens


Authors

  • Olawale Mojeed Akanbi ORCiD Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Taiye Sunday Olugbemi Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Moji Afolayan Samaru College of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Colleges, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Samuel Shehu Ndams College of Agriculture and Animal Science, Division of Agricultural Colleges, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Habiba Iliyasu Atta Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2026.69.77

Keywords:

Broiler, chicken meat, digestibility, fermentation, organoleptic, poultry feed, urea

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of dietary inclusion of urea-treated fermented orange peel meal (FUTOPM) fermented for 3, 6 and 9 days with Aspergillus niger on the sensory attributes of broiler chicken meat and apparent nutrient digestibility.

Materials and Methods: Orange peels were collected, processed, treated with 1% urea, inoculated with a standardized A. niger culture and fermented anaerobically for 3, 6, or 9 days. A total of 240 broiler chickens were assigned to four dietary treatments (control and three FUTOPM diets at 20% inclusion) in a completely randomized design with three replicates per treatment. Sensory evaluation of cooked breast meat was conducted by a trained panel using a 9-point hedonic scale to assess appearance, flavor, texture, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability. Apparent nutrient digestibility was determined using the total fecal collection method over a seven-day period. Data were analyzed using the General Linear Model procedure of SAS and treatment means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at p<0.05.

Results: No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed among treatments for any sensory attribute, indicating that FUTOPM inclusion did not adversely affect meat palatability. Apparent nutrient digestibility improved with increasing fermentation duration. Crude protein digestibility increased to 92.67, 91.08 and 92.45% in the 3-, 6- and 9-day fermented diets, respectively, compared with 85.91% in the control. Crude fiber digestibility values were 81.35, 86.55 and 90.27% for the respective fermentation periods, versus 84.35% in the control. Ether extract digestibility was highest (92.15%) in the 3-day fermented diet, while dry matter and nitrogen-free extract digestibility were maximized in the 9-day fermented treatment.

Conclusion: Urea-assisted fermentation of orange peel meal with Aspergillus niger enhances nutrient digestibility without compromising the sensory quality of broiler chicken meat. Fermentation for 9 days is recommended to optimize nutrient utilization efficiency when incorporating orange peel meal into broiler diets.

References

Afolayan, M., M.M. Iliya, G.S. Bawa and L. Alayande, 2020. Performance of broiler chickens fed graded dietary inclusion levels of moringa (Moringa oleifera) seed cake. Niger. J. Anim. Prod., 47: 107-114.

Aro, S.O., G. Oboh, T. Oboh, I. Olateju, O.R. Ojo and A.O. Ademosun, 2024. Growth performance and carcass traits of broiler chickens fed dietary citrus sinensis peel-based diet. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 57: 3-11.

Mohamed, R.G., M.A. Tony, A.M. Abdelatty, M.M. Hady and E.Y. Ismail, 2022. Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel powder with xylanase supplementation improved growth performance, antioxidant status, and immunity of broiler chickens. Int. J. Vet. Sci., 12: 175-181.

Khan, Y.M., H. Munir and Z. Anwar, 2019. Optimization of process variables for enhanced production of urease by indigenous Aspergillus nigerstrains through response surface methodology. Biocatal. Agric. Biot, Vol. 20. 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101202

Ricci, A., A.B. Díaz, C. Lazzi and A.M.B. Garrido, 2023. Valorization of orange peels exploiting fungal solid‐state and lacto‐fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric., 103: 4614-4624.

West, T.P, 2023. Citric acid production by Aspergillus nigerusing solid-state fermentation of agricultural processing coproducts. Appl. Bios, 2: 1-13.

Singh, A., S. Bajar, A. Devi and N.R. Bishnoi, 2021. Evaluation of cellulase production from Aspergillus nigerand Aspergillus heteromorphus under submerged and solid‐state fermentation. Environ. Sustainability, 4: 437-442.

Akpe, M.E., O.I.A. Oluremi and C.D. Tuleun, 2024. Carcass, internal organ characteristics and GIT morphometry of broiler chickens fed diets containing fermented sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel meal (FSOPM) as a replacement of maize. Asian J. Food Res. Nutr., 3: 1203-1213.

Papagianni, O., K. Argyri, T. Loukas, A. Magkoutis, T. Biagki and A.E. Koutelidakis et al, 2021. Postprandial bioactivity of a spread cheese enriched with mountain tea and orange peel extract in plasma oxidative stress status, serum lipids and glucose levels: An interventional study in healthy adults. Biomolecules, Vol. 11. 10.3390/biom11081241

Google, 2024. Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Google.
[Direct Link]

Station, I.F.A.R.M, 2024. Meteorological data from IAR Meteorological Station, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria. Zaria (Nigeria): Ahmadu Bello University.
[Direct Link]

Diba, K., P. Kordbacheh, H. Mirhendi and S. Rezaie, 2008. Identification of Aspergillus species using morphological characteristics. Pak. J. Med. Sci. Online, 23: 867-872.

Wolk, D.M., C.H. Johnson, E.W. Rice, M.M. Marshall, K.F. Grahn and C.R. Sterling et al, 2000. A spore counting method and cell culture model for chlorine disinfection studies of EncephalitozoonSeptata intestinalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66: 1266-1273.

Aro, S.O., J.O. Agbede, V.A. Aletor and A.A. Ashimi, 2013. Growth performance and bio-economics of growing pigs fed diets containing separately fermented and unfermented cassava tuber wastes. Afr. J. Food, Agric. Nutr. Dev., 13: 7957-7971.

Laconi, E.B. and A. Jayanegara, 2015. Improving nutritional quality of cocoa pod (Theobroma cacao) through chemical and biological treatments for ruminant feeding: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 343-350.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015. Designing literacy assessments for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Project DELS-BANR-15-01. The National Academies Press. Washington (DC).
[Direct Link]

Amao, S.R., S.O. Oyewumi, A.K. Olatunde and M.M. Oguntunde, 2015. Carcass characteristics and organoleptic properties of organically raised broiler chickens. J. Nat. Sci. Res., 5: 12-19.

Sanwo, K.A., 2019. Meat quality and microbial studies of broiler chicken fed diets supplemented with vitamin E and soya bean oil. Nigeria Agric. J., 50: 56-64.

Kyakma, S.S., T.K. Tella and K.A. Sanwo, 2022. Some meat quality parameters of broiler chickens fed diets containing different additives. Niger. J. Anim. Prod., Vol. 49. 10.51791/njap.v49i2.3460

Niehaus, W.G. and B. Samuelsson, 1968. Formation of malonaldehyde from phospholipid arachidonate during microsomal lipid peroxidation. Eur. J. Bioc, 6: 126-130.

Akanji, M., O. Adeyemi, S.O. Oguntoye and F. Sulyman, 2009. Psidium guajavaextract reduces trypanosomosis associated lipid peroxidation and raises glutathione concentrations in infected animals. EXCLI J., 8: 148-154.

AOAC, 2000. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 17th edition. AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD.
[Direct Link]

SAS, 2008. Statistical Analysis System, Computer Software, Version 9.2: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.
[Direct Link]

Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.

Sun, H., D. Chen, H. Cai, W. Chang, Z. Wang and Z. Chen et al, 2022. Effects of fermenting the plant fraction of a complete feed on the growth performance, nutrient utilization, antioxidant functions, meat quality, and intestinal microbiota of broilers. Animals, Vol. 12. 10.3390/ani12202870

Idrissa, Y.Z., I.B. Amaza, A.R. Musa, A.M. Garba, A.Y. Madaki and A. Mohammed et al, 2025. Irish potato peel as a maize substitute in broiler chicken diets: Impacts on growth performance, carcass yield and feed cost. Fudma J. Anim. Prod. Environ. Sci., 1: 23-28.

Liu, Y.Z.Y.D.T.G.H.W.T.L.X, 2024. Antioxidant capacity of fermented corn gluten meal in broiler chickens: A solid-state approach with mixed microbial fermentation. Poult. Sci., Vol. 103. 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104318

Mahfuz, S., Q. Shang and X. Piao, 2021. Phenolic compounds as natural feed additives in poultry and swine diets: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biot, Vol. 12. 10.1186/s40104-021-00565-3

Xu, F., H. Wu, J. Xie, T. Zeng, L. Hao and L. Lu et al, 2023. The effects of fermented feed on the growth performance, antioxidant activity, immune function, intestinal digestive enzyme activity, morphology, and microflora of yellow-feather chickens. Animals, Vol. 13. 10.3390/ani13223545

Chiang, G., W.Q. Lu, X.S. Piao, J.K. Hu, L.M. Gong and P.A. Thacker, 2009. Effects of feeding solid-state fermented rapeseed meal on performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal ecology and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 263-271.

Diarra, S.S, 2018. Peel meals as feed ingredients in poultry diets: Chemical composition, dietary recommendations and prospects. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 102: 1284-1295.

Al-Zharani, M., M. Mubarak, H.A. Rudayni, M.M. Abdelwahab and M. Al-Eissa, 2023. Intoxication induced by urea containing diets in broiler chickens: Effect on weight gain, feed conversion ratio, hematological and biochemical profiles. Adv. Bios Biotechnol., 14: 106-119.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Akanbi, O. M., Olugbemi, T. S., Afolayan, M., Ndams, S. S., & Atta, H. I. (2026). Effects of Urea-Treated Fermented Orange Peel Meal Fermentation Duration on Meat Organoleptic Properties and Apparent Nutrient Digestibility in Broiler Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 25, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2026.69.77