Toxicological Assay-Guided and Fabricated Feeding and Drinking Troughs for Intensive Deep-Litter Poultry Farming System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.361.371Keywords:
Chemical residue, deep litter farming, food security, infection in feeding, poultryAbstract
Background and Objective: Main stream contemporary approach to controlling the impacts of diseases among poultry birds rely largely on curative measures through administration of drugs to infected birds. Most times, as observed in the deep litter poultry farming system, entire flocks including uninfected birds receive treatments they do not need. As such, unguarded use of chemical drugs/antibiotics has led to wastages and accumulation of chemical residues in poultry products with associated health hazards to human consumers. However, wanton and frequent drug usage in poultry is avoidable if feeding and drinking equipment are designed to curb transmission of infection among birds. Materials and Methods: Using toxicological assays as guide and with efficiency and simplicity in view, two newly field-tested and recently patented equipments called ‘healthy liquid drinking trough (HDT)’ and ‘healthy feeding trough (HFT)’ that systematically exclude contamination of the feeding and drinking channels, thereby, eliminating wide-spread infection and transmission of diseases in the (intensive) deep litter poultry farming system were designed. Results: Upon combined usage, they automatically and drastically reduced both the amount and frequency of antibiotics use in poultry by >50%. Additionally, they conferred optimization of feed and water utilization/elimination of wastage by >80%, reduced labour by >70%, reduced production cost by about 15% and reduced chemical residues in poultry meat or eggs by >85%. Conclusion: These new technologies are cheap and they require minimal energy input. They are likely to improve safety of poultry products for consumers' health, increase marketability locally and for export. In addition, they can increase output and profit especially among poultry farmers and poor families in developing countries who keep poultry or inevitably utilize poultry products.
References
Dolberg, F., 2010. Poultry as a tool in human development: Historical perspective, main actors and priorities. FAO Smallholder Poultry Production Paper No. 6, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Dhama, K., R. Tiwari, R.U. Khan, S. Chakraborty and M. Gopi et al., 2014. Growth promoters and novel feed additives improving poultry production and health, bioactive principles and beneficial applications: The trends and advances-a review. Int. J. Pharmacol., 10: 129-159.
Heise, H., A. Crisan and L. Theuvsen, 2015. The poultry market in Nigeria: Market structures and potential for investment in the market. Int. Food Agribus. Manage. Rev., 18: 197-222.
Juma, C., 2016. If Africa learnt to feed its chickens it could feed its people. http://theconversation.com/if-africa-learnt-to-feed-its-chickens-it-could-feed-its-people-65571.
Alemayehu, T., J. Bruno, F. Getachew and T. Dessie, 2018. Socio-economic, marketing and gender aspects of village chicken production in the tropics: A review of literature. ILRI Project Report, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya, July 2018.
FAO., 2019. Gateway to poultry production and products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/en/.
De Bruyn, J., J. Wong, B. Bagnol, B. Pengelly and R. Alders, 2015. Family poultry production and food and nutrition security. CAB Rev., 10: 1-9.
Oyesola, O.B. and M.G. Olujide, 2000. Participation of livestock farmers in Nigerian, Agricultural insurance scheme. A case study of Iseyin L.G.A. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria, September 19-22, 2000, Port Harcourt, Nigeria, pp: 213.
Okoli, I.C., 2003. Incidence and modulating effects of environmental factors on trypanosomosis, peste des petit ruminants (PPR) and bronchopneumonia of West African dwarf goats in Imo State, Nigeria. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 15, No. 9.
FAO., 2013. Poultry Development Review. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, ISBN: 978-92-5-108067-2, Pages: 120.
Olorunwa, O.J., 2018. Economic analysis of broiler production in Lagos State poultry estate, Nigeria. J. Invest. Manage., 7: 35-44.
Patterson, J.A. and K.M. Burkholder, 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci., 82: 627-631.
Kocher, A., 2006. Interfacing Gut Health and Nutrition: The Use of Dietary Prebiotics and Probiotics to Maximise Growth Performance in Pigs and Poultry. In: Antimicrobial Growth Promoters: Where Do We Go From Here? Barug, D., J. de Long, A.K. Kies and M.W.A. Verstegen (Eds.). Wageningen Acad. Publ., Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp: 289-310.
Akinleye, S.B., E.A. Iyayi and K.D. Afolabi, 2008. The performance, haematology and carcass traits of broilers as affected by diets supplemented with or without biomin a natural growth promoter. World J. Agric. Sci., 4: 467-470.
Gassner, B. and A. Wuethrich, 1994. Pharmacokinetic and toxicological aspects of the medication of beef-type calves with an oral formulation of chloramphenicol palmitate. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therapeut., 17: 279-283.
Sonaiya, E.B. and S.E.J. Swan, 2004. Small-scale poultry production: Technical guide. Animal Production and Health 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Mgbakor, M.N. and E.N. Chinonso, 2013. Economic analysis of broiler production (a case study of Orumba South L.G.A of Anambra State, Nigeria). Am.-Eurasian J. Agron., 6: 25-31.
Maduka, C.V., I.O. Igbokwe and N.N. Atsanda, 2016. Appraisal of chicken production with associated biosecurity practices in commercial poultry farms located in Jos, Nigeria. Scientifica, Vol. 2016.
K-State Research and Extension, 1929. Poultry diseases, their prevention and control. Circular No. 106 Revised, Bulletin No. 247, Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, KS., USA., June 1929.
Poppe, C., D.A. Barnum and W.R. Mitchell, 1986. Effect of chlorination of drinking water on experimental Salmonella infection in poultry. Avian Dis., 30: 362-369.
Heyndrickx, M., D. Vandekerchove, L. Herman, I. Rollier, K. Grijspeerdt and L. de Zutter, 2002. Routes for salmonella contamination of poultry meat: Epidemiological study from hatchery to slaughterhouse. Epidemiol. Infect., 129: 253-265.
Do Amaral, L.A., 2004. Drinking water as a risk factor to poultry health. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 6: 191-199.
Neves, D.P., T.M. Banhazi and I.A. Nääs, 2014. Feeding behaviour of broiler chickens: A review on the biomechanical characteristics. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 16: 1-16.
Trawinska, B., A. Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska, B. Nowakowicz-Debek, L. Tymczyna, T. Bombik, M. Pyrz and M. Tymczyna-Sobotka, 2016. Evaluation of microbial contamination of feces and soil on a laying-hen farm depending on sampling site and season. Rev. Bras. Zootec., 45: 190-194.
Kehinde, O.G., K. Junaidu, M. Mohammed and A.M. AbdulRahman, 2012. Detection of antimicrobial drug residues in commercial eggs using Premi® test. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 11: 50-54.
Kuptha, V.M. and B.R. Ragavendiran, 2015. Justification of profitable test kit for microbiological viewing of antimicrobials in rooster eggs. SSRG Int. J. Vet. Sci., 1: 15-17.
R-Biopharm AG, 2016. Antibiotic residue screening: Premi®Test-Microbial inhibition test for broad spectrum screening of food. R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany. http://tuoteluettelo.mediq.fi/liitteet/d377796/.
Ezieshi, V.E., M.J. Nworu, F.O. Bandele, R.O. Suleman, B.C. Ojurongbe and J.M. Olomu, 2003. Laying hen productivity in the tropics as affected by stage of egg production, feed restriction, stocking density and time of day. Arch. Zootec., 52: 475-482.
Martins, J.M.S., C.M.C. Carvalho, F.H. Litz, M.M. Silveira and C.A. Moraes et al., 2016. Productive and economic performance of broiler chickens subjected to different nutritional plans. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 18: 209-216.
TNAU., 2019. Expert system poultry: Layer production indices. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India. http://www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/poultry/Layer%20Production%20Indices.html.
Mensah, S.E.P., O.D. Koudande, P. Sanders, M. Laurentie, G.A. Mensah and F.A. Abiola, 2014. Antimicrobial residues in foods of animal origin in Africa: Public health risks. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 33: 987-996.
Mund, M.D., U.H. Khan, U. Tahir, B.E. Mustafa and A. Fayyaz, 2017. Antimicrobial drug residues in poultry products and implications on public health: A review. Int. J. Food Prop., 20: 1433-1446.
Oliveira, K.P., C.F.S. Ferreira, I.F.F. Tinoco, R.R. Andrade and M. Barbari et al., 2018. Productive performance of broilers at the final stage of breeding submitted to different levels of metabolizable energy in different thermal environments. Agron. Res., 16: 556-563.
Obori, G., 2005. Poultry Care: A complete guide to chicken production. Ganob and Associates Limited, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Patricio, I.S., A.A. Mendes, A.A. Ramos and D.F. Pereira, 2012. Overview on the performance of Brazilian broilers (1990 to 2009). Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 233-238.
Kumar, S., P.K. Singh and A. Prasad, 2009. Effect of graded level of dietary energy and protein on the growth performance of cockerels. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 26: 86-89.
Huque, Q.M.E., M.P. Mostari, S. Faruque and M.R. Islam, 2018. Cockerel production: Strategy of family poultry development. Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abeke, F.O., S.O. Ogundipe, A.A. Sekoni, I.I. Dafwang and I.A. Adeyinka et al., 2008. Response of shika brown cockerels to graded dietary levels of Lablab purpureus beans. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 2: 10-16.
Lawal, O.A., F.O. Owagboriaye, S.A. Aina, S. Kalejaye and J.A. Adegbite, 2015. Feed utilization and growth performance of cockerels fed with soldier ants (Dorylus spp Fabricius) as protein source. Zoologist, 13: 56-61.
Oluyemi, J.A. and F.A. Roberts, 2000. Poultry Production in Warm Wet Climates. 2nd Edn., Spectrum Books, Ibadan, Nigeria, ISBN: 9789780290979, Pages: 244.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.