Egg Shape is Constrained More by Width than Length, Evidence from Double-yolked Duck Eggs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.387.392Keywords:
Double-yolked eggs, duck, egg shape, length, shape index, shape variation, widthAbstract
Background and Objective: While avian egg shape is species specific there is evidence for intraspecific variation and this variation may be especially great in domestic ducks where selection for egg production was not as intense as in the domestic fowl. Egg shape (visually assessed) and shape index (calculated from egg dimensions) were compared in single-yolked (SY) and double-yolked (DY) duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) eggs. Methodology: The SY and DY eggs were collected from a flock of Aylesbury ducks and their dimensions were measured. Shape index was calculated (length divided by width) and egg shape was visually assessed. Results: There was a significant positive relationship between egg shape and shape index both in SY and DY duck eggs (both p<0.001) with the more elongated egg, having a higher shape index. The DY eggs were more elongated than SY eggs in all egg shapes (all p<0.001). When compared to SY eggs, the significantly greater length, which is disproportionately more than the significantly greater width, is associated with presence of a second yolk in DY eggs. Further, length had greater variance than width in both SY and DY eggs. The shape index of SY and DY eggs differed significantly between the various egg shapes (all p<0.05) validating the use of egg shape as an egg categorization tool. However the ranges of shape indexes of different egg shapes overlapped considerably. Conclusion: The shape index is of limited value and thus the visually assessed egg shape should also be used when describing an egg. Further, the egg shape may have important functions during incubation and hatching and the elongated nature of the DY eggs may act as handicap to successful hatching and in part explain why the production of twins from DY eggs has not evolved in avian species.
References
Lack, D., 1968. Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London.
Stoddard, M.C., E.H. Yong, D. Akkaynak, C. Sheard, J.A. Tobias and L. Mahadevan, 2017. Avian egg shape: Form, function and evolution. Science, 356: 1249-1254.
Gilbert, A.B., 1979. Female Genital Organs. In: Form and Function in Birds, King, A.S. and J. McLelland (Eds.). Academic Press, London, UK., pp: 237-360.
Smart, I.H.M., 1991. Egg-Shape in Birds. In: Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles, Deeming, D.C. and M.W.J. Ferguson (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521390712, pp: 101-116.
Salamon, A. and J.P. Kent, 2014. Orientation of the egg at laying-is the pointed or the blunt end first? Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 316-318.
Salamon, A. and J.P. Kent, 2013. Double and single yolked duck eggs: Their contents and dimensions compared and the mechanical stimulation hypothesis for albumen secretion is supported. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 12: 254-260.
Salamon, A. and J.P. Kent, 2016. Yolk size and ovulation order determine fertility within double-yolked duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) eggs. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 28: 440-445.
Deeming, D.C. and M.W.J. Ferguson, 1991. Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521390712, Pages: 448.
Mao, K.M., A. Murakami, A. Iwasawa and N. Yoshizaki, 2007. The asymmetry of avian egg-shape: An adaptation for reproduction on dry land. J. Anat., 210: 741-748.
Barta, Z. and T. Szekely, 1997. The optimal shape of avian eggs. Funct. Ecol., 11: 656-662.
Deeming, D.C., 1991. Reasons for the Dichotomy in Egg Turning in Birds and Reptiles. In: Egg Incubation: Its Effects on Embryonic Development in Birds and Reptiles, Deeming, D.C. and M.W.J. Ferguson (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521390712, pp: 307-323.
Cullen, E., 1957. Adaptations in the kittiwake to cliff‐nesting. Ibis, 99: 275-302.
Birkhead, T., 2016. The Most Perfect Thing: Inside (and Outside) a Bird’s Egg. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, ISBN: 978163286369, Pages: 304.
Birkhead, T.R., J.E. Thompson and J.D. Biggins, 2017. Egg shape in the common guillemot Uria aalge and Brunnich’s guillemot U. Lomvia: Not a rolling matter? J. Ornithol., 158: 679-685.
Birkhead, T.R., J.E. Thompson, D. Jackson and J.D. Biggins, 2017. The point of a Guillemot's egg. Ibis, 159: 255-265.
Cucco, M., M. Grenna and G. Malacarne, 2012. Female condition, egg shape and hatchability: A study on the grey partridge. J. Zool., 287: 186-194.
Mazanowski, A., Z. Bernacki and T. Kisiel, 2005. Comparing the structure and chemical composition of duck eggs. Ann. Anim. Sci., 5: 53-66.
Kokoszynski, D., Z. Bernacki and H. Korytkowska, 2007. Eggshell and egg content traits in Peking duck eggs from the P44 reserve flock raised in Poland. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 8: 9-16.
Salamon, A. and J.P. Kent, 2016. Triple-yolked eggs in domestic ducks: A rare occurrence. Poult. Sci., 95: 1179-1181.
Lowman, Z.S., C.R. Parkhurst and M.T. Wooten, 2016. Impact of egg shape on hatchability in Pekin ducks. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 15: 188-191.
Roberts, V., 1997. Standard for Eggs. In: British Poultry Standards, Roberts, V. (Ed.). 5th Edn., Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, pp: 359-362.
Jaap, R.G. and F.V. Muir, 1968. Erratic oviposition and egg defects in broiler-type pullets. Poult. Sci., 47: 417-423.
Benoff, F.H., 1980. Defective egg production in a population of dwarf white leghorns. Br. Poult. Sci., 21: 233-240.
Fasenko, G.M., F.E. Robinson, B.L. Danforth and I. Zelter, 2000. An examination of fertility, hatchability, embryo mortality and chick weight in double versus single-yolked broiler breeder eggs. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 489-493.
Brun, J.M., I. Delaunay, N. Sellier, B. Alletru, R. Rouvier and M. Tixier-Boichard, 2003. Analysis of laying traits in first cycle geese in two production systems. Anim. Res., 52: 125-140.
Alvarez, R. and P.M. Hocking, 2012. Changes in ovarian function and egg production in commercial broiler breeders through 40 weeks of lay. Br. Poult. Sci., 53: 386-393.
R Core Team, 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Salamon, A. and J.P. Kent, 2014. Changes during incubation within double-yolked duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) eggs: Yolk position, mortality, hatchability and the importance of an optimal egg size. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 13: 695-702.
Curtis, M.R., 1914. Studies on the physiology of reproduction in the domestic fowl. VI. Double-and triple-yolked eggs. Biol. Bull., 26: 55-83.
Burke, W.H., M.H. Henry and I. Elezaj, 1997. Comparison of embryos and chicks that developed as single individuals in double yolk eggs with those that developed in single yolk eggs. Poult. Sci., 76: 901-907.
Deeming, D.C., 2011. Double-yolked pheasant eggs provide an insight into the control of albumen secretion in bird eggs. Bri. Poult. Sci., 52: 40-47.
Zelenka, D.J., P.B. Siegel and H.P. van Krey, 1986. Ovum formation and multiple ovulation in lines of white plymouth rocks and their crosses. Br. Poult. Sci., 27: 409-414.
Baker, D.E., 2002. A geometric method for determining shape of bird eggs. Auk: Ornithol. Adv., 119: 1179-1186.
Harun, M.A., R.J. Veeneklaas, G.H. Visser and M. Van Kampen, 2001. Artificial incubation of Muscovy duck eggs: why some eggs hatch and others do not. Poult. Sci., 80: 219-224.
Erisir, Z. and O. Ozbey, 2005. The effects of egg weight and shape index on hatching characteristics in bronze Turkeys. Indian Vet. J., 82: 967-968.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
