Reproductive Characteristics Differed in a Series of B-Congenic Lines of White Leghorns Evidently Indicating Significant Influence of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Chickens


Authors

  • Chong Wang College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong-510642, China
  • Gururaj Kulkarni USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, Michigan-48823, U.S.A.
  • Huanmin Zhang USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, Michigan-48823, U.S.A.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.441.448

Keywords:

B-congenic lines, embryo mortality, fertility, genetics, hatchabiity, MHC, white leghorns

Abstract

Reproductive characteristics were compared between a series of seven B-congenic lines of White Leghorns retrospectively using eight year’s reproduction records. The records encompass a total of 33,010 fertile eggs set to hatch under controlled conditions, which were collected accumulatively from 2,129 young hens on the USDA-ARS, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory specific pathogen free farm during the years (2008-2015). Over the eight year period, average fertility, embryo mortality and hatchability of fertile eggs ranged from 71.6±0.77 (line 15.N-21) to 88.2±0.56 (line 15.P-19), 18.6±0.83 (line 15.6-2) to 28.5±0.84 (line 15.N-21) and 41.2±0.92 (line 15.N-21) to 57.6±1.09 (line 15.6-2) between the B-congenic lines and from 73.0±0.93 (2014) to 87.2±0.58 (2011), 19.5±0.84 (2012) to 35.2±0.97 (2009) and 38.3±1.02 (2009) to 55.4±1.12 (2014) between the years, respectively. Statistical analyses showed both B-congenic line (genetics) and the year of line reproduction (environmental) as well as the line by year (genetics by environment) interaction significantly influenced the reproductive characteristics (p<0.0001). Considerable variation observed between the B-congenic lines each year suggests the reproductive performance followed a polygenic model of inheritance, which are attributable to genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci. Findings from this study document the reproductive characteristics of the 7 B-congenic lines of White Leghorns and add to the mounting evidence that MHC affects reproductive characteristics in a diverse species including human, wild chimpanzees, fish, bovine, swine, mice, rats and chickens.

References

Abplanalp, H., 1992. Inbred lines as genetic resources of chickens. Poult. Sci. Rev., 4: 29-39.

Abplanalp, H., K. Sato, D. Napolitano and J. Reid, 1992. Reproductive performance of inbred congenic Leghorns carrying different haplotypes for the major histocompatibility complex. Poult. Sci., 71: 9-17.

Antczak, D.F., 1982. Structure and function of the major histocompatibility complex in domestic animals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 181: 1030-1036.

Bacon, L.D., L.B. Crittenden, R.L. Witter, A. Fadly and J. Motta, 1983. B5 and B15 associated with progressive Marek's disease, Rous sarcoma and avian leukosis virus-induced tumors in inbred 15I4 chickens. Poult. Sci., 62: 573-578.

Bacon, L.D., T.L. Fredericksen, D.G. Gilmour, A.M. Fadly and L.B. Crittenden, 1985. Tests of association of lymphocyte alloantigen genotypes with resistance to viral oncogenesis in chickens. 2. Rous sarcoma and lymphoid leukosis in progeny derived from 63 x 151 and 100 x 63 crosses. Poul. Sci., 64: 39-47.

Bacon, L.D., H.D. Hunt and H.H. Cheng, 2000. A review of the development of chicken lines to resolve genes determining resistance to diseases. Poult. Sci., 79: 1082-1093.

Bacon, L.D., H.D. Hunt and H.H. Cheng, 2001. Genetic resistance to marek's disease. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 255: 121-141.

Bacon, L.D., D.B. Hunter, H.M. Zhang, K. Brand and R. Etches, 2004. Retrospective evidence that the MHC (B haplotype) of chickens influences genetic resistance to attenuated infectious bronchitis vaccine strains in chickens. Avian Pathol., 33: 605-609.

Bacon, L.D. and R.L. Witter, 1994. Serotype specificity of B-haplotype influence on the relative efficacy of Marek's disease vaccines. Avian Dis., 38: 65-71.

Bacon, L.D. and R.L. Witter, 1995. Efficacy of marek's disease vaccines in Mhc heterozygous chickens: Mhc congenic x inbred line F1 matings. J. Heredity, 86: 269-273.

Bacon, L.D., R.L. Witter, L.B. Crittenden, A. Fadly and J. Motta, 1981. B-haplotype influence on Marek's disease, Rous sarcoma and lymphoid leukosis virus-induced tumors in chickens. Poul. Sci., 60: 1132-1139.

Brah, G.S., J.S. Sandhu and M.L. Chaudhary, 1991. Heritability estimates of components of incubation mortality in white leghorns. Br. Poult. Sci., 32: 871-874.

Briles, W.E., W.H. McGibbon and M.R. Irwin, 1950. On multiple alleles effecting cellular antigens in the chicken. Genetics, 35: 633-652.

Cahaner, A. and J. Hillel, 1980. Estimating heritability and genetic correlation between traits from generations F2 and F3 of self-fertilizing species: A comparison of three methods. Theor. Applied Genet., 58: 33-38.

Cahaner, A., E.J. Smith, S. Swenson and S.J. Lamont, 1996. Associations of individual genomic heterozygosity, estimated by molecular fingerprinting and of dam major histocompatibility complex with growth and egg production traits in layer chickens. Poult. Sci., 75: 1463-1467.

Gautschi, C. and C. Gaillard, 1990. Influence of major histocompatibility complex on reproduction and production traits in swine. Anim. Genet., 21: 161-170.

Gill IV, T.J., T.J. Gill III, H.W. Kunz, N.A. Musto and C.W. Bardin, 1984. Genetic and morphometric studies of the heterogeneity in the testicular defect of the Hre rat and the interaction between the Hre and grc genes. Biol. Reprod., 31: 595-603.

Gillingham, M.A.F., D.S. Richardson, H. Lovlie, A. Moynihan, K. Worley and T. Pizzari, 2009. Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., 276: 1083-1092.

Gilmour, D.G., 1959. Segregation of genes determining red cell antigens at high levels of inbreeding in chickens. Genetics, 44: 14-33.

Hunt, H.D., S. Jadhao and D.E. Swayne, 2010. Major histocompatibility complex and background genes in chickens influence susceptibility to high pathogenicity avian influenza virus. Avian Dis., 54: 572-575.

Hunt, H.D., B. Lupiani, M.M. Miller, I. Gimeno, L.F. Lee and M.S. Parcells, 2001. Marek's disease virus down-regulates surface expression of MHC (B complex) class I (BF) glycoproteins during active but not latent infection of chicken cells. Viroly, 282: 198-205.

Jager, I., C. Eizaguirre, S.W. Griffiths, M. Kalbe and C.K. Krobbach et al., 2007. Individual MHC class I and MHC class IIB diversities are associated with male and female reproductive traits in the three-spined stickleback. J. Evolutionary Biol., 20: 2005-2015.

Kapczynski, D.R., K. Liljebjelke, G. Kulkarni, H. Hunt, H.J. Jiang and D. Petkov, 2011. Cross reactive cellular immune responses in chickens previously exposed to low pathogenic avian influenza. BMC Proc., Vol. 5.

Kaufman, J., 2000. The simple chicken major histocompatibility complex: Life and death in the face of pathogens and vaccines. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 355: 1077-1084.

Kaufman, J., 2015. What chickens would tell you about the evolution of antigen processing and presentation. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 34: 35-42.

Kaufman, J., J. Jacob, L. Shaw, B. Walker, S. Milne, S. Beck and J. Salomonsen, 1999. Gene organisation determines evolution of function in the chicken MHC. Immunol. Rev., 167: 101-117.

Kaufman, J. and J. Salomonsen, 1992. B-G: We know what it is, but what does it do? Immunol. Today, 13: 1-3.

Kaufman, J. and H.J. Wallny, 1996. Chicken MHC molecules, disease resistance and the evolutionary origin of birds. Curr. Topics Microbiol. Immunol., 212: 129-141.

Kingori, A.M., 2011. Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchabilty in poultry. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10: 483-492.

Kulkarni, G. and H. Zhang, 2014. Evaluation of reproductive characteristics of 21 highly inbred lines of white leghorns divergently selected for or segregating in tumor resistance. Open J. Anim. Sci., 5: 59-70.

Lakshmanan, N., J.S. Gavora and S.J. Lamont, 1997. Major histocompatibility complex class II DNA polymorphisms in chicken strains selected for Marek's disease resistance and egg production or for egg production alone. Poult. Sci., 76: 1517-1523.

Lamont, S.J., 1991. Immunogenetics and the major histocompatibility complex. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 30: 121-127.

Lamont, S.J., 1998. The chicken major histocompatibility complex and disease. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 17: 128-142.

Lamont, S.J., Y.H. Hou, B.M. Young and A.W. Nordskog, 1987. Research note: Differences in major histocompatibility complex gene frequencies associated with feed efficiency and laying performance. Poult. Sci., 66: 1064-1066.

Liljander, M., M.A. Sallstrom, S. Andersson, P. Wernhoff, A. Andersson, R. Holmdahl and R. Mattsson, 2006. Identification of genetic regions of importance for reproductive performance in female mice. Genetics, 173: 901-909.

Lovlie, H., M.A. Gillingham, K. Worley, T. Pizzari and D.S. Richardson, 2013. Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci., Vol. 280.

Lunden, A., I. Edfors-Lilja, K. Johansson, L.E. Liljedahl and M. Simonsen, 1993. Associations between major histocompatibility complex genes and production traits in white leghorns. Poult. Sci., 72: 989-999.

Nilsson, L.L., S. Djurisic and T.V.F. Hviid, 2014. Controlling the immunological crosstalk during conception and pregnancy: HLA-G in reproduction. Frontiers Immunol., Vol. 5.

Mallard, B.A., B.N. Wilkie, B.A. Croy, B.W. Kennedy and R. Friendship, 1987. Influence of the swine major histocompatibility complex on reproductive traits in miniature swine. J. Reprod. Immunol., 12: 201-214.

Mays, J.K., L.D. Bacon, A.R. Pandiri and A.M. Fadly, 2005. Response of white leghorn chickens of various B haplotypes to infection at hatch with subgroup J avian leukosis virus. Avian Dis., 49: 214-219.

Miller, M.M., H. Abplanalp and R. Goto, 1988. Genotyping chickens for the B-G subregion of the major histocompatibility complex using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Immunogenetics, 28: 374-379.

Miller, M.M., L.D. Bacon, K. Hala, H.D. Hunt and S.J. Ewald et al., 2004. 2004 Nomenclature for the chicken major histocompatibility (B and Y) complex. Immunogenetics, 56: 261-279.

Nikbakht, G. and A. Esmailnejad, 2015. Chicken major histocompatibility complex polymorphism and its association with production traits. Immunogenetics, 67: 247-252.

Nordskog, A.W., I.Y. Pevzner and S.J. Lamont, 1987. Subregions and functions of the chicken major histocompatibility complex. Poult. Sci., 66: 790-794.

Owen, J.P., M.E. Delany, C.J. Cardona, A.A. Bickford and B.A. Mullens, 2008. Host inflammatory response governs fitness in an avian ectoparasite, the northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum). Int. J. Parasitol., 39: 789-799.

Pharr, G.T., J.B. Dodgson, H.D. Hunt and L.D. Bacon, 1998. Class II MHC cDNAs in 15I5 B-congenic chickens. Immunogenetics, 47: 350-354.

Plachy, J., J.R. Pink and K. Hala, 1992. Biology of the chicken MHC (B complex). Crit. Rev. Immunol., 12: 47-79.

Porsova-Dutoit, I., 2006. [Male hormonal contraception]. Vnitr. Lek., 52: 1077-1084, (In Czech).

Renard, C. and M. Vaiman, 1989. Possible relationships between SLA and porcine reproduction. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 29: 569-576.

Sapp, R.L., R. Rekaya, I. Misztal and T. Wing, 2004. Male and female fertility and hatchability in chickens: A longitudinal mixed model approach Poult. Sci., 83: 1253-1259.

SAS., 2015. Using JMP® 12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC., USA.

Sato, K., H. Abplanalp, D. Napolitano and J. Reid, 1992. Effects of heterozygosity of major histocompatibility complex haplotypes on performance of Leghorn hens sharing a common inbred background. Poult. Sci., 71: 18-26.

Siegel, P.B., A.S. Larsen, C.T. Larsen and E.A. Dunnington, 1993. Research note: Resistance of chickens to an outbreak of necrotic enteritis as influenced by major histocompatibility genotype and background genome. Poult. Sci., 72: 1189-1191.

Singh, J. and I.C. Verma, 1987. Influence of major histo(in)compatibility complex on reproduction. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. Microbiol., 15: 150-152.

Stear, M.J., T.S. Pokorny, S.E. Echternkamp and D.D. Lunstra, 1989. The influence of the BoLA-A locus on reproductive traits in cattle. J. Immunogenet., 16: 77-88.

Stromberg, J., 1975. A Guide to Better Hatching. Stromberg Publishing Co., Iowa, USA., ISBN-13: 9780915780006, pp: 8-25.

Wakenell, P.S., M.M. Miller, R.M. Goto, W.J. Gauderman and W.E. Briles, 1996. Association between the Rfp-Y haplotype and the incidence of Marek's disease in chickens. Immunogenetics, 44: 242-245.

Wright, D., C. Rubin, K. Schutz, S. Kerje and A. Kindmark et al., 2012. Onset of sexual maturity in female chickens is genetically linked to loci associated with fecundity and a sexual ornament. Reprod. Domestic. Anim., 47 : 31-36.

Wroblewski, E.E., P.J. Norman, L.A. Guethlein, R.S. Rudicell and M.A. Ramirez et al., 2015. Signature Patterns of MHC diversity in three gombe communities of wild chimpanzees reflect fitness in reproduction and immune defense against SIVcpz. PLoS Biol.

Yoo, B.H. and B.L. Sheldon, 1992. Association of the major histocompatibility complex with avian leukosis virus infection in chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 33: 613-620.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Wang, C., Kulkarni, G., & Zhang , H. (2015). Reproductive Characteristics Differed in a Series of B-Congenic Lines of White Leghorns Evidently Indicating Significant Influence of Major Histocompatibility Complex in Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14(8), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.441.448