Effect of Intermittent Lighting System on Some of the Productive Performance of Laying Hens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2014.416.420Keywords:
Egg laying hens, intermittent lighting, productive performanceAbstract
The research was conducted at Krabo modern research poultry house of Agriculture Faculty, Damascus University during August, 2011 till October, 2012. A total of 1512 one-day-old chicks of Babcock B-300-hybrid layer hens distributed randomly and equally into six groups with 3 replicates in the same group were housed until the age of 17 weeks in a closed house with deep litter and then transferred to the production house equipped with batteries of a three-tries until the age of 60 weeks in order to determine the effect of intermittent lighting on some of productive performance of laying hens. Chicks in the first group, G1 (control 1) were exposed to step down of lighting through the stage of growth and step up through the production stage In G2 (control 2), chicks were exposed to short constant step up lighting system while chicks in G3, G4, G5 and G6 were exposed to intermittent lighting-step up, step down intermittent, short constant-intermittent and intermittent-intermittent of lighting systems, respectively. Results showed that the application of the lighting system in G5 had no significant effect on the averages of mortality rate and the live body weight but birds showed significant earlier sexual maturity and improvement in the production of egg per hen compared with those of G1. Results also showed a significant decrease in the average of egg weight compared with G1 but significant increase in the same index compared with G2. However, a significant increase in the average of egg mass produced per hen compared with those of G1.
References
Banks, P.A. and T.B. Koen, 1989. Intermittent lighting regimens for laying hens. Poul. Sci., 68: 739-743.
Classen, H.L., C.B. Annett, K.V. Schwean-Lardner, R. Gonda and D. Derow, 2004. The effects of lighting programmes with twelve hours of darkness per day provided in one, six or twelve hour intervals on the productivity and health of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 45: S31-S32.
Dawson, A., V.M. King, G.E. Bentley and G.F. Ball, 2001. Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J. Biol. Rhythms, 16: 365-380.
Durmus, I. and S. Kalebasi, 2009. Effect of fluctuate lighting on performance of laying hens. Archiv fur Tierzucht, 52: 200-204.
Eitan, Y. and M. Soller, 1991. Two-way selection for threshold body weight at first egg in broiler strain females. 2. Effect of supplemental light on weight and age at first egg. Poult. Sci., 70: 2017-2022.
Freitas, H.J., J.T. Cotta, A.I. Oliveira and Luis David Solis Murgas, 2010. Effect of different lighting programs on semi heavy laying hens reared in open shelters. Biotemas, 23: 157-162.
Gewehr, C.E. and H.J. de Freitas, 2007. Intermittent lighting for layer hens rearing in open shelters. Revista De Ciencias Agroveterinarias, 6: 54-62.
Ma, H., B.M. Li, H.W. Xin, Z.X. Shi and Y. Zhao, 2013. Effect of intermittent lighting on production performance of laying-hen parent stocks. Proceedings of the ASABE Annual International Meeting, July 21-24, 2013, Kansas City, Mo.
Leeson, S. and J.D. Summers, 1980. Effect of early light treatment and diet self-selection on laying performance. Poul. Sci., 59: 11-15.
Lewis, P.D., G.C. Perry, T.R. Morris and M.M. Midgley, 1992. Intermittent lighting regimes and mortality rates in laying hens. World`s Poult. Sci. J., 48: 113-120.
Leeson, S., L. Caston and P.D. Lewis, 2005. Rearing and laying performance following various step-down lighting regimens in rearing period. Poult. Sci., 84: 626-632.
Lewis, P.D. and T.R. Morris, 2005. Change in the effect of constant photoperiods on the rate of sexual maturation in modern genotypes of domestic pullet. Br. Poult. Sci., 46: 584-586.
Lewis, P.D. and R.M. Gous, 2006. Various photoperiods and BiomittentTM Lighting during rearing for broiler breeders subsequently transferred to open-sided housing at 20 weeks. Br. Poult. Sci., 47: 24-29.
Lewis, P.D., R. Danisman and R.M. Gous, 2010. Photoperiods for broiler breeder females during the laying period. Poult. Sci., 89: 108-114.
Schwean-Lardner, K., B.I. Fancher and H.L. Classen, 2012. Impact of daylength on behavioural output in commercial broilers. Applied Anim. Behave. Sci., 137: 43-52.
Marr, J.E., F.W. Garland, R.C. Eatan and H.L. Wilcke, 1962. Effect of controlled day length during the growing and laying periods on egg production. Poult. Sci., 41: 16-63.
Morris, T.R., M. Midgley and E.A. Butler, 1988. Experiments with the Cornell intermittent lighting system for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 29: 325-332.
Morris, T. R. and E.A. Butler, 1995. New intermittent lighting programme (the reading system) for laying pullets. Br. Poul. Sci., 36: 531-535.
Morris, J.S., A. Ohman and R.J. Dolan, 1999. A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating unseen fear. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 96: 1680-1685.
Rahimi, G., M. Rezaei, H. Hafezian and H. Saiyahzadeh, 2005. The effect of intermittent lighting schedule on broiler performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 396-398.
Shen, L., Z. Shi, L. Bao-ming and C.H.M. Wang, 2012. The effect of lighting programmes on egg production and quality of Beijing you-chicken. Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering-CIGR-AgEng 2012: Agriculture and Engineering for a Healthier Life, July 8-12, 2012, Valencia, Spain, pp: 883.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Asian Network for Scientific Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
