Use of a Protease in Poultry Feed Offers Promising Environmental Benefits


Authors

  • K.M. Oxenboll Novozymes A/S, DK-2880 Bagvsvaerd, Denmark
  • K. Pontoppidan Novozymes A/S, DK-2880 Bagvsvaerd, Denmark
  • F. Fru-Nji DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., P.O. Box 2676, 4002 Basel, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.842.848

Keywords:

DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., P.O. Box 2676, 4002 Basel, Switzerland, environment, feed, protease

Abstract

Enzymes are widely used in feed to improve utilization of nutrients and it is generally acknowledged that phytases, by improving phytate phosphorus utilization are an important tool to reduce phosphorus pollution and the environmental problems derived from this such as eutrophication. Lately, the use of proteases as feed enzymes has gained interest. Proteases are added to feed with the purpose of increasing dietary protein hydrolysis and thus enabling improved nitrogen utilization. When animals utilize nitrogen better, there is a possibility to decrease the diet protein content and in turn also reduce the content of nitrogen in manure. The environmental consequences of decreased dietary protein content and reduced nitrogen excretion were investigated in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which considered all steps in broiler production from production of feed ingredients, to the broilers leaving the chicken house, including the use of manure. Wide ranges of environmental impacts were analyzed, covering emissions of nitrous compounds to both air and the aquatic environment. Significant benefits were obtained for all impacts considered. Most important were the benefits related to reduced emissions of ammonia, which help reduce both health risks and environmental impacts, such as acidification and eutrophication. The largest effects were obtained when protease was used as a tool to allow for lower diet protein content. However, even when used in a diet with normal protein level significant benefits were observed. It is illustrated that the use of protease can contribute significantly to current efforts to reduce nitrogen emissions from livestock production.

References

Angel, C.R., W. Saylor, S.L. Viera and N. Ward, 2011. Effects of a mono component protease on performance and protein utilization in seven- to twenty-two-day-old broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 90: 2281-2286.

Aureli, R., A.M. Kluenter and F.N. Fru, 2010. Efficacy of a phytase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of male broiler chicks fed a diet based on maize and soybean meal. World Poult. Sci. J., 66: 1-5.

Bolan, N.S., A.A. Szogi, T. Chuasavathi, B. Seshadri, M.J. Rothrock and P. Panneerselvam, 2010. Uses and management of poultry litter. World's Poult. Sci. J., 66: 673-698.

Burns, R.T., H. Xin, R.S. Gates, H. Li and L.B. Moody et al., 2011. Southeastern broiler gaseous and particulate matter emissions monitoring. Final Project Report, Iowa State University, University of Kentucky. http://www.epa.gov/airquality/agmonitoring/pdfs/KY1BSummaryReport.pdf.

Da Silva, V.P., H. van der Werf and S.R. Soares, 2010. LCA of French and Brazilian broiler poultry production systems. http://www.lcafood2010.uniba.it/presentations/friday-24/parallel-4a/Da%20Silva.pdf.

De Klein, C., R.S.A. Novoa, S. Ogle, K.A. Smith and P. Rochette et al., 2006. N2O Emissions from Managed Soils and CO2 Emissions from Lime and Urea Application. In: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, IPCC (Ed.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bangkok, Thailand.

Dong, H., J. Mangino, T.A. McAllister, J.L. Hatfield and D.E. Johnson et al., 2006. Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management. In: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use,q IPCC (Ed.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bangkok, Thailand.

EcoInvent, 2009. EcoInvent database version 2.1. The Ecoinvent Centre, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH, Zurich).

EPA, 2008. New requirements for controlling manure, wastewater from large animal feeding operations. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/6427a6b7538955c585257359003f0230/eafce2ca2b2eedea852574f300607fef!OpenDocument.

Freitas, D.M., S.L. Vieira, C.R. Angel, A. Favero and A. Maiorka, 2011. Performance and nutrient utilization of broilers fed diets supplemented with a novel mono-component protease. J. Applied Poult. Res., 20: 322-334.

Fru-Nji, F., A.M. Kluenter, M. Fischer and K. Pontoppidan, 2011. A feed serine protease improves broiler performance and increases protein and energy digestibility. J. Poult. Sci., 48: 239-246.

Hauschild, M. and H. Wenzel, 1998. Environmental Assessment of Products. 1st Edn., Chapman and Hall, London.

ISO 14040, 2006. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=23151.

ISO 14044, 2006. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38498.

Leip, A., F. Weiss, T. Wassenaar, I. Perez and T. Fellmann et al., 2010. Evaluation of the livestock sector's contribution to the EU greenhouse gas emissions. Final Report, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/livestock-gas/full_text_en.pdf.

Oxenboll, K., K. Pontoppidan, F. Fru and J. Broz, 2011. Life cycle assessment of using RONOZYME®ProAct as a feed additive for poultry. 110131/KMO. http://www.novozymes.com/en/sustainability/sustainable-solutions/life-cycle-assessments/Published%20LCA%20studies/English.pdf.

Raney, T., S. Gerosa, Y. Khwaja, J. Skoet and H. Steinfeld et al., 2009. The State of Food and Agriculture 2009: Livestock in the Balance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, ISBN: 978-92-5-106215-9.

Downloads

Published

2011-10-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Oxenboll, K., Pontoppidan, K., & Fru-Nji , F. (2011). Use of a Protease in Poultry Feed Offers Promising Environmental Benefits. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10(11), 842–848. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.842.848