Experimental Study on Effects of Litter Material and its Quality on Foot Pad Dermatitis in Growing Turkeys


Authors

  • I.M.I. Youssef Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Germany
  • A. Beineke Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Germany
  • K. Rohn Institute of Biometry and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Germany
  • J. Kamphues Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.1125.1135

Keywords:

Foot pad dermatitis, litter moisture, litter quality, litter type, Turkeys

Abstract

Since turkeys are in continuous contact with the litter, the potential effects of bedding materials and their quality are of major concern in the etiology of Foot Pad Dermatitis (FPD). Two week-old female turkeys were allotted to four groups, with 29 in each and housed either on wood shavings, lignocellulose, chopped straw or dried maize silage over a period of four weeks without artificial climatisation. The birds in all groups were fed identical commercial diets. Half of the turkeys in each group were additionally exposed for 8 h/d to corresponding wet (27% DM; by adding water) litter in adjacent separate boxes. Foot pads of the birds were examined macroscopically and histologically at the start and end of the experiment as well as at weekly intervals. Lignocellulose showed the lowest severity of FPD on dry and wet litter treatments, whereas chopped straw was associated with high FPD scores on dry treatment. Foot pad scores were similar on wood shavings and dried maize silage whether dry or wet. The DM content of litter materials was determined and the highest moisture content among dry treatments was observed in straw (about 31%) which was paralleled with FPD severity. The severity of FPD was overall much higher (>2 times) on wet than on dry litter. Exposure of the birds to wet litter for 8 h/d was sufficient to develop FPD. Lignocellulose could reduce the FPD severity, probably due to higher water binding capacity and faster release of water, while straw may increase it due to lower water evaporation. The physical form of litter either soft (lignocellulose) or with sharp edges (chopped straw) may also affect the onset of FPD. The litter moisture appears to be the dominant factor resulting in the development of FPD and should be kept lower than about 30% to minimise the prevalence and severity of FPD in turkeys.

References

Berg, C., 1998. Foot-pad dermatitis in broilers and turkeys-prevalence, risk factors and prevention. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

Berk, J., 2007. Can Alternative Kinds of Litter Reduce Foot Pad Lesions in Female Turkeys. In: Turkey Production: Future Challenges. Hafez, H.M. (Ed.). Mensch and Buch Publisher, Berlin, ISBN: 3-86664356, pp: 143-149.

Berk, J., 2009. Effects of Different Types of Litter on Performance and Pododermatitis in Male Turkeys. In: Turkey Production: Toward Better Welfare and Health, Hafez, H.M. (Ed.). Mensch and Buch Publisher, Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-86664-701-5, pp: 127-134.

Berk, J., 2009. Effect of litter type on prevalence and severity of pododermatitis in male broilers. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr., 122: 257-263.

Bilgili, S., 2009. Factors Contributing to Foot Pad Dermatitis in Broilers. Watt Poultry, USA., pp: 26-27.

Bilgili, S.F., J.B. Hess, J.P. Blake, K.S. Macklin, B. Saenmahayak and J.L. Sibley, 2009. Influence of bedding material on footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 18: 583-589.

Bosse, H. and H. Meyer, 2007. Different Methods for Turkey-Rearing. In: Turkey Production: Future Challenges, Hafez, H.M. (Ed.). Mensch and Buch Publisher, Berlin, ISBN: 3-86664356, pp: 123-127.

Bruce, D.W., S.G. Mcilroy and E.A. Goodall, 1990. Epidemiology of a contact dermatitis of broilers. Avian Pathol., 19: 523-537.

Ekstrand, C. and B. Algers, 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish turkey poults. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 38: 167-174.

Ekstrand, C., B. Algers and J. Svedberg, 1997. Rearing conditions and foot pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Vet. Med., 31: 167-174.

Elwinger, K. and L. Svensson, 1996. Effect of dietary protein content, litter and drinker type on ammonia emission from broiler houses. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 64: 197-208.

Geraedts, L.H.J., 1983. Leg disorders caused by litter conditions and the influence of the type of litter and of litter cultivations on the results of Turkeys. Turkeys, 31: 20-25.

Glebocka, K., 2008. Gut health is a critical factor for litter quality. World Poult., 24: 12-13.

Greene, J.A., R.M. McCracken and R.T. Evans, 1985. A contact dermatitis of broilers-clinical and pathological findings. Avian Pathol., 14: 23-38.

Harms, R.H., B.L. Damron and C.F. Simpson, 1977. Effects of wet litter and supplemental biotin and/or whey on the production of foot pad dermatitis in broilers. Poult. Sci., 56: 291-296.

Hester, P.Y., D.L. Cassens and T.A. Bryan, 1997. The applicability of particleboard residue as a litter material for male turkeys. Poult. Sci., 76: 248-255.

Jodas, S. and H.M. Hafez, 2000. Litter management and related diseases in turkeys. World Poult., 16: 30-35.

Lerner, S.P., 1996. Breast blisters. Proceedings of the 12th Minnesota Poultry Workshop, (MPW'96), Minnesota, USA., pp: 47-49.

Martland, M.F., 1984. Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening Turkeys. Avian Pathol., 13: 241-252.

Martland, M.F., 1985. Ulcerative dermatitis dm broiler chickens: The effects of wet litter. Avian Pathol., 14: 353-364.

Mayne, R.K., 2005. A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing Turkeys and broilers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 61: 256-267.

Mayne, R.K., P.M. Hocking and R.W. Else, 2006. Foot pad dermatitis develops at an early age in commercial Turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci., 47: 36-42.

Mayne, R.K., R.W. Else and P.M. Hocking, 2007. High litter moisture alone is sufficient to cause footpad dermatitis in growing turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci., 48: 538-545.

McIlroy, S.G., E.A. Goodall and C.H. McMurray, 1987. A contact dermatitis of broilers-epidemiological findings. Avian Pathol., 16: 93-105.

Meluzzi, A., C. Fabbri, E. Folegatti and F. Sirri, 2008. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: Effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. Br. Poult. Sci., 49: 257-264.

Nairn, M.E. and A.R.A. Watson, 1972. Leg weakness of poultry-a clinical and pathological characterisation. Aust. Vet. J., 48: 645-656.

Martrenchar, A., E. Boilletot, D. Huonnic and F. Pol, 2002. Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France. Prev. Vet. Med., 52: 213-226.

Downloads

Published

2010-11-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Youssef, I., Beineke, A., Rohn, K., & Kamphues, J. (2010). Experimental Study on Effects of Litter Material and its Quality on Foot Pad Dermatitis in Growing Turkeys. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(12), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.1125.1135