Effects of Beak Trimming on Pecking Force
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.863.866Keywords:
Actimeter, beak trim, laying hen, peck forceAbstract
Beak trimming of the production laying hen has come under great scrutiny by welfare and consumer advocacy groups as a potential source of acute and chronic pain as well as having the potential to inhibit the freedom to express normal behaviors such as feeding behaviors. Although several studies have shown evidence of immediate pain response from beak trimming, the long term effects on bird welfare are not well understood. In the present study we investigated the force with which chicks peck during feeding. Chicks were beak trimmed using hot blade trimming at 2 days of age and were tested on a force plate at 3, 4 and 5 weeks of age. Both the time spent pecking and the forces of those pecks were measured. Beak trimmed birds spent significantly less time pecking at the feed and used less force than untrimmed birds at 3 weeks of age (p<0.05). However, at 4 and 5 weeks of age the difference was no longer significant (p>0.05). Beak trimmed birds also had a higher pecking ratio (peck force:time, p<0.05) than untrimmed birds. The difference was no longer apparent at 4 and 5 weeks of age (p>0.05). Our data suggest that beak trimming alters feeding behavior at a young age. However, changes in pecking force and time spent feeding were not long lasting and became similar to those of untrimmed birds after 3 weeks post-trimming.
References
Anderson, R.A., L.D. McBrayer and A. Herrel, 2008. Bite force in vertebrates: Opportunities and caveats for use of a nonpareil whole-animal performance measure. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 93: 709-720.
Cunningham, D.L., 1992. Beak trimming effects on performance, behavior and welfare of chickens: A review. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 1: 129-134.
Fowler, S.C., 2002. Behavioral spectroscopy with the force-plate actometer. Curr. Separations, 20: 17-22.
Gentle, M.J., B.O. Hughes and R.C. Hubrecht, 1982. The effect of beak trimming on food intake, feeding behaviour and body weight in adult hens. Applied Anim. Ethol., 8: 147-159.
Herrel, A., J. Podos, S.K. Huber and A.P. Hendry, 2005. Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin=s finches: Implications for the evolution of beak shape. Functional Ethol., 19: 43-48.
Husak, J.F., A.K. Lappin, S.F. Fox and J.A. Lemos-Espinal, 2006. Bite-force performance predicts dominance in male venerable collared lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus). Copeia, 2: 301-306.
Jendral, M.J. and F.E. Robinson, 2004. Beak trimming in chickens: Historical, economical, physiological and welfare implications and alternatives for preventing feather pecking and cannibalistic activity. Avian Poult. Bio. Rev., 15: 9-23.
Sanderson, D.J. and P.E. Martin, 1997. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic adaptations in unilateral below-knee amputees during walking. Gait Posture, 6: 126-136.
Sjodahl, C., G.B. Jarnlo, B. Soderberg and B.M. Persson, 2002. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal plane of trans-femoral amputees before and after special gait re-education. Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 26: 101-112.
Underwood, H.A., C.D. Tokuno and J.J. Eng, 2004. A comparison of two prosthetic feed on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gate compensations in individuals iwht unilateral trans-tibial amputation. Clin. Biomech., 19: 609-616.
Van Swearingen, J., 2008. Facial rehabilitation: A neuromuscular reeducation, patient centered approach. Facial Plast. Surg., 24: 250-259.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Asian Network for Scientific Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.