In vitro Efficacy Comparisons of Disinfectants Used in the Commercial Poultry Farms


Authors

  • Z. Moustafa Gehan Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • W. Anwer Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • H.M. Amer Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • I.M. EL-Sabagh Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • A. Rezk Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • E.M. Badawy Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, 2Department of Virology,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.237.241

Keywords:

Bacterial and fungal resistance, disinfectants, in vitro evaluation of disinfectants, monitoring poultry farms, viral resistance

Abstract

Studies have indicated variations in the degree of efficacy of the commercial disinfectants commonly used in poultry production facilities. An adequate method of in vitro testing was used to compare the efficacy of some of these disinfectants while testing them in conditions similar to those of the poultry facilities. Five commercially available disinfectants were tested against 7 selected bacterial, fungal and viral isolates. The obtained results indicated that, most of the tested disinfectant products were effective at the manufacturer recommended level within 30 min contact time when tested in the absence of organic matter. However, when organic matter was present longer contact times were needed to demonstrate the effectiveness. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Fusarium species and Newcastle disease virus showed variable degrees of resistance to some of the tested disinfectant products in the presence of organic matter. Conclusively, monitoring program should be adopted regularly in poultry facilities to test the problematic microbes individually for their resistance against commercial disinfectants.

References

Bailey, J.S., R.J. Buhr, N.A. Cox and M.E. Berrang, 1996. Effect of hatching cabinet sanitation treatments on salmonella cross-contamination and hatchability of broiler eggs. Poult. Sci., 75: 191-196.

Bates, R.C., P.T.B. Schaffer and S.M. Sutherland, 1977. Development of poliovirus having increased resistance to chlorine inactivation. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 3: 849-853.

Blakistone, B., R. Chuyate, D. Jr. Kautter, J. Charbonneau and K. Suit, 1999. Efficacy of oxania active against selected spore former. J. Food Prot., 62: 262-267.

Ellen, G., 2006. Biosecurity procedures for poultry farm visits. http://www.deq.virginia.gov/water.

Gillespie, M.T., J.W. May and R.A. Skurray, 1986. Plasmid-encoded resistance to acriflavin and quaternary ammonium compound in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 34: 47-51.

Malchesky, P.S., 1993. Peracetic acid and its application to medical instrument sterilization. Artifical Organs, 17: 147-152.

McDonnell, G. and A.D. Russell, 2001. Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity, action and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 14: 227-227.

Moustafa-Gehan, Z., W. Anwer and S.T. Moubarak, 2004. Evaluation of some chemical disinfectants used in commercial poultry hatcheries. J. Egypt. Vet. Med. Assoc., 64: 221-233.

North, M.O. and D.D. Bell, 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th Edn., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.

Pilotto, F., L.B. Rodrigues, L.R. Santos, W.A. Klein, F.M. Colussi and V.P. Nascimento, 2007. Antibacterial efficacy of commercial disinfectants on dirt floor used in poultry breeder houses. Rev. Bras. Ciencia Avicola, 9: 127-131.

Qayyum, R., M. Naeem and K. Muhammad, 1999. Effect of physico-chemical factors on survival of Newcastle disease virus. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 1: 42-44.

Rodgers, J.D., J.J. McCullagh, P.T. McNamee, J.A. Smyth and H.J. Ball, 2001. An investigation into the efficacy of hatchery disinfectants against strains of staphylococcus aureus associated with poultry industry. Vet. Microbiol., 82: 131-140.

Rossoni, E.M. and C.C. Gaylarde, 2000. Comparison of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid as sanitizing agents for stainless steel food processing surfaces using epifluorescence microscopy. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 61: 81-85.

Russell, A.D. and I. Chopra, 1996. Understanding Antibacterial Action and Resistance. 2nd Edn., Ellis Horwood Press, Chichester, England.

Russell, A.D. and J.R. Furr, 1996. Biocides: Mechanisms of antifungal action and fungal resistance. Sci. Prog., 79: 27-48.

Sander, J.E. and J.L. Wilson, 1999. Effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfection during incubation of chicken eggs on microbial levels and productivity. Avian Dis., 43: 227-233.

Sarma, D.R., L. Char, N.L. Rao, D.J. Khan and G. Narayna, 1985. A comprehensive study on bacterial flora isolated from yolk sac infection (omphalities) in chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 20: 262-266.

Sidhu, M.S., H. Sorum and A. Holck, 2002. Resistance to quaternary ammonium compound in food related bacteria. Microbiol. Drug Resistance, 8: 393-399.

Spielholz, B., 1998. Properties of hatchery disinfectants. Misset World Poult., 14: 50-51.

Tennet, J.M., B.R. Lyon, M.T. Gillespie, J.W. May and R.A. Skurray, 1985. Cloning and expression of staphylococcus aureus plasmid-mediated quaternary ammonium resistance in E. coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 27: 79-83.

Thamlikitkul, V., S. Trakulsomboon, S. Louisiriro-tchanakul, A. Chaiprasert and S. Foongladda et al., 2001. Microbial killing activity of peracetic acid. J. Vet. Med. Assoc. Thailand, 84: 1375-1382.

Walker, S.E., J.E. Sander, I. Hsincheng and R.E. Wooley, 2002. The in vitro efficacy of quaternary ammonium compound disinfectant and/or ethylenediam-inetetraacetic acid-tris against commercial broiler hatchery isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Avian Dis., 46: 826-830.

Walker, S.E. and J.E. Sander, 2004. Effect of biosentry 904 and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-tris disinfecting during incubation of chicken eggs on microbial levels and productivity of poultry. Avian Dis., 48: 238-243.

Willinghan, E.M., J.E. Sander, S.G. Thayer and J.L. Wilson, 1996. Investigation of bacterial resistance to hatchery disinfectant. Avian Dis., 40: 510-515.

Young, D.C. and D.C. Sharp, 1985. Virion conformational forms and the complex inactivation kinetics of echovirus by chlorine in water. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 49: 359-364.

Youseif, H.M.Z., Z.A.W. Hassanin and M.B. Jihan, 2001. The sanitizing effect of glutaraldehyde-quaternary ammonium combination aldekol GDA0 on bacterial infection in hatching eggs laboratory and field trials. Vet. Med. J., 49: 531-541.

Zander, D.V., A.J. Bermudez and E.T. Mallinson, 1997. Principles of Disease Prevention Diagnosis and Control. In: Diseases of Poultry, Canek, B.W. and H.J. Barnes, C.W. Beard, L. MacDougold and Y.M. Saif (Eds.). Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA., pp: 369-413.

Downloads

Published

2009-02-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Gehan, Z. M., Anwer, W., Amer, H., EL-Sabagh, I., Rezk, A., & Badawy, E. (2009). In vitro Efficacy Comparisons of Disinfectants Used in the Commercial Poultry Farms. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.237.241